政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118827
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51640812      Online Users : 676
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118827


    Title: 華人面對自己或重要他人死亡威脅之後續因應
    The Divergent Effects of Mortality Salience of Self versus Mortality Salience of Significant Others among Chinese
    Authors: 程可心
    Cheng, Ke-Xin
    Contributors: 孫蒨如
    Sun, Chien-Ru
    程可心
    Cheng, Ke-Xin
    Keywords: 死亡威脅凸顯
    華人文化
    重要他人
    恐懼管理理論
    Motality salience
    Chinese culture
    Significant other
    Terror management theory
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-07-24 11:00:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人類擁有因應死亡威脅的辦法，源於西方的恐懼管理理論認為人們以文化世界觀防禦的方式應對死亡威脅。而華人在面對死亡威脅時是否出現文化世界觀防禦的傾向，在過去的研究中得到不一致的結果。目前也少有研究探討重視關係的華人如何因應重要他人的死亡威脅。本文通過兩個研究了解華人如何因應自己或重要他人的死亡威脅。研究一採用3（實驗操弄：自己死亡威脅凸顯、重要他人死亡威脅凸顯或自己疼痛凸顯）x 2（評論類別：讚美或批評）的組間設計，119名參與者隨機分派至不同實驗情境。依變項為參與者對評論的評價，以此了解參與者維護華人重要文化的程度。結果顯示經歷重要他人死亡威脅凸顯的參與者有明顯的維護華人重要文化傾向，且這種傾向高於經歷自己死亡威脅凸顯的參與者。研究二從享受生活、維繫重要人際關係和行善積德三類行為，了解華人在經歷自己或重要他人的死亡威脅凸顯後不同的因應方式。60名參與者分派至不同的實驗情境，實驗採用3（實驗操弄：自己死亡威脅凸顯、重要他人死亡威脅凸顯或自己疼痛凸顯）x 3（行為類別：享受生活、維繫重要人際關係或行善積德）的混合設計，其中實驗操弄為組間變項，行為類別為組內變項，依變項為參與者從事各類行為的意願程度。結果主要發現被凸顯重要他人死亡的參與者有更低程度的行善積德意願。
    Terror Management Theory originated from the West which proposes that people manage their terror of death by defending their own cultural worldview. The present research employed two studies to examine how Chinese people manage the death-related anxiety of themselves and from their significant others. In Study 1, 119 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (Manipulation: self mortality salience, mortality salience of significant other, or self toothache) x 2 (Comment of Chinese Culture: Praise or Criticism) factorial design. The dependent measure was how well an individual is defending the cultural values. The results indicated that participants who experienced the mortality salience of significant other had a significant tendency to defend the Chinese cultural values, and this tendency is higher than participants who experienced self mortality salience. In Study 2, we explored how Chinese people cope with the mortality salience by employing three types of behavior: enjoy life, maintaining important interpersonal relationships and doing good deeds. 60 Participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (Manipulation: self mortality salience, mortality salience of significant other, or self toothache) x 3 (behavior type: enjoy life, maintaining important interpersonal relationships or doing good deeds) mixed design. The experimental manipulation was a between-subjects variable, the behavioral type was a within-subjects variable, and the dependent variable was the participant’s degree of willingness to engage in different types behavior. As a result, it was found that participants who experienced the mortality salience of significant other were significantly less willing to do good deeds. These implications were also discussed.
    Reference: 陳怡全. (2009). 死亡威脅對服從之影響: 奇魅領導及命令特性之調節效果. 復興崗學報, (95), 53-79.
    高旭繁, & 陸洛. (2006). 夫妻傳統性/現代性的契合與婚姻適應之關聯. 本土心理學研究, (25), 47-100.
    郭士賢, & 張思嘉. (2004). 華人生活世界中的多面向因果思維. 本土心理學研究, (21), 233-267.
    韓貴香, & 李美枝. (2011). 大我的道德臉面受威脅對華人選擇求助對象的影響. 本土心理學研究, (36), 3-32.
    何華府, & 顏乃欣. (2016). 死亡突顯性對注意力的影響-以文化性線索為例. 中華心理學刊, 58(4), 263-291.
    何友暉, 陳淑娟, & 趙志裕. (1991). 關係取向: 為中國社會心理方法論求答案. 中國人的心理與行為. 台北: 桂冠圖書公司, 49-66.
    洪美新. (2017). 驟然喪親遺族治喪歷程的喪慟經驗之探究[D].
    黄光国. (1988). 人情与面子: 中国人的权力游戏. 中国人的权力游戏》, 台北: 巨流图书公司, 7-55.
    黃光國. (1995). 儒家價值觀的現代轉化: 理論分析與實徵研究. 本土心理學研究, (3), 276-338.
    李美枝. (1993). 從有關公平判斷的研究結果看中國人之人己關係的界限. 本土心理學研究, (1), 267-300.
    林以正, & 張硯評. (2012). 跨文化的重複驗證: 形式或實質?. 本土心理學研究, (38), 151-156.
    陸洛. (2003). 人我關係之界定-“折衷自我” 的現身. 本土心理學研究, (20), 139-207.
    孫蒨如, & 王崇信. (2005). 華人的自我評價與自我肯定歷程. 本土心理學研究, (24), 139-187.
    王叢桂, & 羅國英. (2014). 個人資源與退休對台灣中高齡者心理需求的影響. 本土心理學研究, (42), 251-282.
    王倫婷. (2012). 死亡威脅對吸菸者之香菸態度的影響: 自尊之調節效果[D].
    顏志龍(2007):《死亡顯著性對個體為團隊自我犧牲行為之影響及不當領導之調節效果》. 國家科學委員會研究報告,報告編號 NSC 95-2413-H-135-001。台北:行政院國家科學委員會.
    顏志龍. (2009). 恐懼管理理論死亡防衛效果之檢驗. 未發表之原始資料.
    顏志龍. (2012). 渴望心理學的科學革命: 從 [恐懼管理理論] 的研究歷程反思心理學研究之現狀. 本土心理學研究, (38), 103-129.
    楊國樞. (2004). 華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究: 社會取向與個人取向的觀點. 本土心理學研究, (22), 11-80.
    楊國樞. (1993). 中國人的社會取向: 社會互動的觀點. 中國人的心理與行為: 理論與方法篇 (一九九二)》. 台北: 桂冠圖書公司, 87-142.
    楊國樞, 余安邦, & 葉明華. (1991). 中國人的個人傳統性與現代性: 概念與測量. 《中國人的心理與行為》. 台北: 桂冠圖書公司.
    葉啟政. (1984). 邊陲性與學術發展: 再論社會科學中國化. 收於葉啟政,《 社會, 文化和知識份子》,(頁 307-344), 台北: 東大圖書公司.
    張培新. (2006) 台灣宗教組織運作的社會資本考察：以慈濟功德會為例。中山人文社會科學期刊，14(1)，125-163。
    胡文郁, 邱泰源, 釋惠敏, 陳慶餘, & 陳月枝. (1999). 從醫護人員角度探討癌末病人之靈性需求. 臺灣醫學, 3(1), 8-19.
    王倫婷.（2012）死亡威脅對吸菸者之香菸態度的影響: 自尊之調節效果.
    韦庆旺, 周雪梅, & 俞国良. (2015). 死亡心理: 外部防御还是内在成长?. 心理科学进展, 23(2), 338-348.
    吳秀碧, 賀孝銘, & 羅崇誠. (2002). 大學生生命意義觀之探討. 提昇大學基礎教育計畫, 教育部計畫編號 H, 141.
    徐淑如, 董和昇, & 羅雅嬪. (2008). 網路購物服務失誤, 服務補救與顧客滿意度-期望不一致與知覺公平觀點. 管理評論, 27(1), 1-24.
    张自慧. (2008). 论耻感与耻感教育. 遼寧大學學報 (哲學社會科學版), 36(6), 10-15.
    鄭曉江. (1999). 善死與善終──中國人的死亡觀. 雲南人民出版社.
    鄭燿男,& 陳怡靖.(2012).國小學校文化與組織承諾的關係: 初探積德行善學校文化之影響. 華醫學報, 036
    莊耀嘉. (2004).死亡焦慮對孕育後代動機與近親選擇的效應: 整合概括繁衍說與懼死因應論的一項探討 (1/2)[J].
    莊耀嘉. (2008). 孝道在親子關係裡的死亡焦慮緩解作用。台北:卓越計畫總結研討會
    莊耀嘉. (2009). 子女對中老年父母的存在性意義: 親子關係是否作為父母抗衡死亡焦慮的憑藉[J].

    Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1997). Subliminal exposure to death-related stimuli increases defense of the cultural worldview. Psychological Science, 8(5), 379-385.
    Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117, 497.
    Becker, E. (2007). The denial of death. Simon and Schuster.
    Burke, B. L., Martens, A., & Faucher, E. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 155-195.
    Cozzolino, P. J., Staples, A. D., Meyers, L. S., & Samboceti, J. (2004). Greed, death, and values: From terror management to transcendence management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 278-292.
    Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. Public self and private self, 189, 189-212.
    Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., & Lyon, D. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of personality and social psychology, 58(2), 308-318.
    Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 627.
    Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Simon, L., & Breus, M. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of personality and social psychology, 67(4), 627.
    Greenberg, J., Simon, L., Harmon‐Jones, E., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1995). Testing alternative explanations for mortality salience effects: Terror management, value accessibility, or worrisome thoughts?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 417-433.
    Heine, S. J., Harihara, M., & Niiya, Y. (2002). Terror management in Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 5(3), 187-196.
    Hui, C. H., Chan, S. W., Lau, E. Y., Cheung, S. F., & Mok, D. S. Y. (2014). The role of religion in moderating the impact of life events on material life goals: Some evidence in support of terror management theory. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(1), 52-61.
    Hui, V. K. Y., & Fung, H. H. (2008). Mortality anxiety as a function of intrinsic religiosity and perceived purpose in life. Death Studies, 33(1), 30-50.
    Kökdemir, D., & Yeniçeri, Z. (2010). Terror Management in a Predominantly Muslim Country. European Psychologist.
    Lambert, A. J., Eadeh, F. R., Peak, S. A., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P., & Slochower, J. M. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research. Journal of personality and social psychology, 106(5), 655.
    Lykins, E. L., Segerstrom, S. C., Averill, A. J., Evans, D. R., & Kemeny, M. E. (2007). Goal shifts following reminders of mortality: Reconciling posttraumatic growth and terror management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1088-1099.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
    Martin, I. M., & Kamins, M. A. (2010). An application of terror management theory in the design of social and health‐related anti‐smoking appeals. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 172-190.
    Ma-Kellams, C., & Blascovich, J. (2012). Enjoying life in the face of death: East–West differences in responses to mortality salience. Journal of personality and social psychology, 103(5), 773.
    Paudel, R. (2016). Mortality salience and product evaluation: role of self versus loved ones. Editorial review board members, 20(3), 100.
    Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychological review, 106(4), 835.
    Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(4), 681.
    Tam, K. P., Chiu, C., & Lau, I. Y. (2007). Terror management among Chinese: Worldview defence and intergroup bias in resource allocation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 93-102.
    Wakimoto, R. (2006). Mortality salience effects on modesty and relative self-effacement. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 176-183.

    Wang, Y. (2014). The Divergent Effects of Mortality Salience of Self versus Mortality Salience of a Loved One on Materialistic Consumption. Journal of Research for Consumers, 26, 106-130.
    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.
    Yen, C. L., & Cheng, C. P. (2010). Terror management among Taiwanese: Worldview defence or resigning to fate? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 13(3), 185-194.
    Zhu, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, J., & Han, S. (2007). Neural basis of cultural influence on self-representation. Neuroimage, 34(3), 1310-1316.
    Zhou, X., Lei, Q., Marley, S. C., & Chen, J. (2009). Existential function of babies: Babies as a buffer of death‐related anxiety. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 40-46.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學系
    104752027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104752027
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.PSY.010.2018.C01
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Psychology] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    202701.pdf2075KbAdobe PDF2218View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback