政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/118773
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51734415      線上人數 : 578
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/118773


    題名: 你被「攝」誘了！從解釋水平理論看拍攝視角與廣告文案對廣告態度之影響
    How Camera Angle of Product and Ad Claims in Print Advertisement Affect Consumer Decision? The Application of Construal Level Theory
    作者: 李玟蓉
    Lee, Wen-Yung
    貢獻者: 林穎青
    Lin, Ying-Ching
    李玟蓉
    Lee, Wen-Yung
    關鍵詞: 拍攝視角
    解釋水平理論
    渴望性
    可行性
    促進焦點
    預防焦點
    權力感
    廣告標語文案類型
    Camera angle
    Construal level theory
    Desirability
    Feasibility
    Promotion-focus
    Prevention-focus
    Power
    Ad slogan
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-07-19 17:31:22 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　在現今競爭激烈的消費市場中，產品的廣告與行銷已然成為商家進行銷售時的最佳利器，因此，產品廣告等相關議題也受到研究者的廣泛關注。過往文獻指出，產品圖片的拍攝視角高低會影響消費者對產品的觀感，低視角圖片使消費者感覺產品較為「強大」，高視角圖片則讓人感覺產品較為「弱勢」。在平面廣告情境下，若透過廣告文案提醒消費者「權力感」的概念，拍攝視角的效果亦會影響消費者對產品的喜好度。根據解釋水平理論，權力感與解釋水平為雙向關係，即高權力感的人為高解釋水平，高解釋水平個人也擁有高權力感，低解釋水平與低權力感亦如此。此外，當廣告訊息解釋水平與消費者心理解釋水平一致時會產生適配導致較佳的說服效果且處理流暢性為其中介變項。綜合以上，本文推論，低視角圖片與高解釋水平廣告標語及高視角圖片與低解釋水平廣告標語分別存在適配導致較佳的廣告效果，且處理流暢性與權力感為此交互作用之中介。

    　　為驗證本研究提出之假設，本研究共設計二個實驗探討拍攝視角與廣告標語文案類型對廣告態度的關係，並檢驗處理流暢性與權力感是否為此效果之中介。實驗一驗證渴望性-可行性廣告標語與拍攝視角交互作用對廣告態度有顯著影響，實驗二驗證促進焦點-預防焦點廣告標語與拍攝視角的交互作用對廣告態度有顯著影響。兩個實驗結果均顯示處理流暢性與權力感並非此交互作用之中介變項。
    Much research has shown that when the upward-looking camera angle employed to depict a product, people generate more favorable attitude toward the product. The reverse is found when the product depicted by downward-looking angle. However, the existing literature seldom incorporates construal level ad slogan as a determining factor in the effectiveness of camera angle. According to construal level theory, power and construal level are bidirectional relationship. When the construal level of the ad message the same as consumers’ mental construal level leads to high processing efficiency and fit. As a result, we propose processing efficiency and power are the mediators of the interaction effect between camera angle and construal level ad slogan.

    We demonstrate across two experiments that there is interaction effect between camera angle and construal level ad slogan. Study 1 shows there is interaction effect between camera angle and desirability-feasibility ad slogan. Study 2 shows there is interaction effect between camera angle and promotion-focus and prevention-focus ad-slogan. Processing fluency and power are not the mediator of the interaction effect.
    參考文獻: 一、中文部分
    林雅萍（2012年 1 月）。數位浪潮淹沒了平面廣告，洪流或許帶來破壞卻也創造新生？ Oath看見數位行銷力。取自 https://goo.gl/hhgSR6。
    方寧（2014）。雜誌，就要緊緊抓住”她”。尼爾森媒體研究。取自https://goo.gl/VWEyWP。

    二、英文部分
    Aggarwal, P., & Zhao, M. (2015). Seeing the big picture: The effect of height on the level of construal. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(1), 120-133.
    Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313-344.
    Andrew, J. D. (1976). The major film theories: An introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136(4), 610-622.
    Bargh, J. A. (2006). What have we been priming all these years? On the development, mechanisms, and ecology of nonconscious social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 147-168.
    Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617-645.
    Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169-182.
    Bernstein, S. (1988). The technique of film production. London: Focal Press.
     
    Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
    Eisenstein, S. (1964). Film form: Essays in film theory. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace Press.
    Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The “visual depiction effect” in advertising: Facilitating embodied mental simulation through product orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003.
    Freling, T. H., Vincent, L. H., & Henard, D. H. (2014). When not to accentuate the positive: Re-examining valence effects in attribute framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(2), 95-109.
    Fujita, K., Henderson, M. D., Eng, J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17(4), 278-282.
    Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351-367.
    Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 453.-466.
    Galinsky, A. D., Rucker, D. D., & Magee, J. C. (2015). Power: Past Findings, Present Considerations, and Future Directions. In M. Mikulincer, & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology (pp. 421-460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Goodman, J. K., & Malkoc, S. A. (2012). Choosing here and now versus there and later: The moderating role of psychological distance on assortment size preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 751-768.
    Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2010). Truth from language and truth from fit: The impact of linguistic concreteness and level of construal on subjective truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(11), 1576-1588.
    Higgins, E. T. (2000). Making a good decision: value from fit. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1217-1230.
    Higgins, E. T., Idson, L. C., Freitas, A. L., Spiegel, S., & Molden, D. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140-1153.
    Hong, J., & Sternthal, B. (2010). The effects of consumer prior knowledge and processing strategies on judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 301-311.
    Huang, M. C., Wu, P. H., & Lin, C. H. (2016). Hedonic or utilitarian product: The influence of temporal distance upon consumers` choice. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(2), 451-461.
    Huang, X., Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2013). “Seeing” the social roles of brands: How physical positioning influences brand evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(4), 509-514.
    Johar, G. V. (1995). Consumer involvement and deception from implied advertising claims. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3) 267-279.
    Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265-284.
    Kim, H., Rao, A. R., & Lee, A. Y. (2009). It`s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 877-889.
    Kim, H., Rao, A. R., & Lee, A. Y. (2009). It`s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 877-889.
    Kim, Y. J., Park, J., & Wyer, R. S. (2009). Effects of temporal distance and memory on consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(4), 634-645.
    Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 199-217.
    Kover, A. J. (1995). Copywriters` implicit theories of communication: An exploration. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 596-611.
    Kraft, R. N. (1987). The influence of camera angle on comprehension and retention of pictorial events. Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 291-307.
    Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195-208.
    Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205-218.
    Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2009). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735-747.
    Liberman, N., & Förster, J. (2009a). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(2), 203-216.
    Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523-534.
    Lin, Y. C., & Wang, K. Y. (2016). Language choice in advertising for multinational corporations and local firms: A reinquiry focusing on monolinguals. Journal of Advertising, 45(1), 43-52.
    Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5-18.
    Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523-534.
     
    Liu, W. (2008). Focusing on desirability: The effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 640-652.
    Luna, D., Lerman, D., & Peracchio, L. A. (2005). Structural constraints in code-switched advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 416-423.
    Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361-367.
    McCain, T. A., Chilberg, J., & Wakshlag, J. (1977). The effect of camera angle on source credibility and attraction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 21(1), 35-46.
    Meier, B. P., & Dionne, S. (2009). Downright sexy: Verticality, implicit power, and perceived physical attractiveness. Social Cognition, 27(6), 883-892.
    Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243-247.
    Meier, B. P., Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2007). Failing to take the moral high ground: Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(4), 757-767.
    Messaris, P. (1997). Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Meyers-Levy, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (1992). Getting an angle in advertising: The effect of camera angle on product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4)454-461.
    Simmons, B. L., Gooty, J., Nelson, D. L., & Little, L. M. (2009). Secure attachment: Implications for hope, trust, burnout, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 233-247.
    Nordhielm, C. L. (2002). The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(3), 371-382.
    Pallak, S. R. (1983). Salience of a communicator`s physical attractiveness and persuasion: A heuristic versus systematic processing interpretation. Social Cognition, 2(2), 158-170.
    Peracchio, L. A., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2005). Using stylistic properties of ad pictures to communicate with consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 29-40.
    Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
    Pham, M. T., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Promotion and prevention in consumer decision-making: The state of the art and theoretical propositions. In S. Ratneshwar & D. G. Mick (Eds.), Inside consumption: Consumer motives, goals, and desires (pp. 8-43). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge
    Previc, F. H. (1990). Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(03), 519-542.
    Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364-376.
    Sassenberg, K., Jonas, K. J., Shah, J. Y., & Brazy, P. C. (2007). Why some groups just feel better: the regulatory fit of group power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(2), 249-267.
    Schlosser, A. E., Rikhi, R. R., & Dagogo-Jack, S. W. (2016). The ups and downs of visual orientation: The effects of diagonal orientation on product judgment. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 496-509.
    Schuldt, J. P., Konrath, S. H., & Schwarz, N. (2012). The right angle: Visual portrayal of products affects observers’ impressions of owners. Psychology & Marketing, 29(10), 705-711
    Scott, L. M., & Batra, R. (2003). Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
     
    Scott, L. M. (1994). Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 252-273.
    Semin, G. R., Higgins, T., de Montes, L. G., Estourget, Y., & Valencia, J. F. (2005). Linguistic signatures of regulatory focus: How abstraction fits promotion more than prevention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 36-45.
    Sevenants, A., & d’Ydewalle, G. (2006). Does it matter to be pictured from below? Psychologica Belgica, 46(3), 199-210.
    Slepian, M. L., Masicampo, E. J., & Ambady, N. (2015). Cognition from on high and down low: Verticality and construal level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 1-17.
    Smith, P. K., & Trope, Y. (2006). You focus on the forest when you`re in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 578.
    Smith, P. K., Wigboldus, D. H., & Dijksterhuis, A. P. (2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 378-385.
    Sun, Y., Wang, F., & Li, S. (2011). Higher height, higher ability: Judgment confidence as a function of spatial height perception. PloS One, 6(7), 122-125.
    Sundar, A., & Noseworthy, T. J. (2014). Place the logo high or low? Using conceptual metaphors of power in packaging design. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 138-151.
    Sungur, H., Hartmann, T., & van Koningsbruggen, G. M. (2016). Abstract Mindsets Increase Believability of Spatially Distant Online Messages. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-9.
    Thompson, R. (1993). Grammar of the edit. Oxford, England: Focal Press.
    Thompson, R. (1998). Grammar of the shot. Oxford, England: Focal Press.
    Tiemens, R. K. (1970). Some relationships of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 14(4), 483-490.
     
    Todorov, A., Goren, A., & Trope, Y. (2007). Probability as a psychological distance: Construal and preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 473-482.
    Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876-889.
    Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403-421.
    Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440-463.
    Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660-671.
    Van Kerckhove, A., Geuens, M., & Vermeir, I. (2015). The floor is nearer than the sky: How looking up or down affects construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1358-1371.
    Verser, R., & Wicks, R. H. (2006). Managing voter impressions: The use of images on presidential candidate web sites during the 2000 campaign. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 178-197.
    White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It`s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472-485.
    Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257-1267.
    Yang, X., Ringberg, T., Mao, H., & Peracchio, L. A. (2011). The construal (in) compatibility effect: The moderating role of a creative mind-set. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(4), 681-696.
    Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2011). Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 376-389.
    Yang, X., Zhang, J., & Peracchio, L. A. (2010). Understanding the impact of self-concept on the stylistic properties of images. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 508-520.
    Zhang, J., & Yang, X. (2015). Stylistic properties and regulatory fit: Examining the role of self-regulatory focus in the effectiveness of an actor`s vs. observer`s visual perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 449-458.
    Zhu, R., & Meyers-Levy, J. (2007). Exploring the cognitive mechanism that underlies regulatory focus effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(1), 89-96.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    103464044
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103464044
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/THE.NCCU.COMM.005.2018.F05
    顯示於類別:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    404401.pdf62960KbAdobe PDF2126檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋