English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114420/145447 (79%)
Visitors : 53262336      Online Users : 174
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/117638


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117638


    Title: 道瓊與天下雜誌永續指標之比較與市場反應分析
    The comparison and market reaction analysis of Dow Jones and CommonWealth Magazine Sustainability Index
    Authors: 胡孝卉
    Hu, Hsiao Hui
    Contributors: 李志宏
    Lee, Jie Haun
    胡孝卉
    Hu, Hsiao Hui
    Keywords: 企業社會責任
    股價累積平均異常報酬
    道瓊永續指數
    天下企業公民獎
    Corporate social responsibility(CSR)
    Cumulate average abnormal returns
    Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI)
    Common Wealth Magazine CSR Awards
    Date: 2018
    Issue Date: 2018-06-12 17:18:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文之研究目的為，利用事件研究法檢驗不同市場對於企業社會責任（CSR）表現良好或較差之公司反應，採用股價累積平均異常報酬（CAAR）作為衡量標準，比較美國與台灣之投資人對於企業入選道瓊永續指數與天下企業公民獎之異同。結果顯示，企業被納入道瓊永續指數之CAAR為正，被踢除之公司有顯著短暫負報酬，長期宣告效果消失，CAAR反轉。而企業被納入或被踢除天下企業公民獎亦皆有顯著負報酬，但長期負CAAR未反轉，負面效果持續。推測可能原因為「評分機構公信力」與「問卷指標選用」造成宣告效果差異。
    The purpose of this study is to examine the response of different markets to corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance using event study method. Using the cumulate average abnormal return (CAAR) as a measure to compare the US and Taiwan investors` different response to Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and CommonWealth Magazine CSR Awards. The results show that enterprises have positive return when included in Dow Jones Sustainability Index, while those who are excluded have negative returns. And the announcement effect disappears in the long-term, CAAR reversed. On the other hand, enterprises included in or excluded from CommonWealth Magazine CSR Awards all have negative returns, but the enterprises which are excluded show a larger negative return. And the long-term negative CAAR is not reversed, the negative effect continued. The difference in the announcement effect may be caused by “the credibility of rating institution” and “the questionnaire indicator selection”.
    Reference: 1. 何里仁(2003)，公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究，逢甲大學，會計與財稅研究所未出版碩士論文
    2. 林穎捷. (2016). 負面社會責任對企業股價之影響-以台灣上市公司為例. 宜蘭大學應用經濟與管理學系經營管理碩士班未出版碩士論文, 1-57.
    3. 洪榮華，陳香如，王玉珍(2005)，公司內部治理機制與公司績效之關係-股權結構與董事會特性的觀點，輔仁管理評論， 12(3)，23-40
    4. 張鳳真. (2011). 企業社會責任事件宣告與股票異常報酬率之關連性. 亞洲大學會計與資訊學系學位論文, 1-70.
    5. 陳有生. (2011). 企業社會責任獎宣告效應對股票異常報酬影響之實證分析. 長榮大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文, 1-104.
    6. 黃瓊瑤, 王癸元, & 張鳳真. (2013). 企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究. 當代會計, 14(2), 175-204.
    7. Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), 543-569
    8. Bauer, R., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751-1767.
    9. Bragdon, J. H., & Marlin, J. (1972). Is pollution profitable. Risk management, 19(4), 9-18.
    10. Brammer, S., Brooks, C., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures. Financial management, 35(3), 97-116.
    11. Byus, K., Deis, D., & Ouyang, B. (2010). Doing well by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and profitability. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 75(1), 44.
    12. Cheung, A. W. K. (2011). Do stock investors value corporate sustainability? Evidence from an event study. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(2), 145-165.
    13. Clacher, I., & Hagendorff, J. (2012). Do announcements about corporate social responsibility create or destroy shareholder wealth? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(3), 253-266.
    14. Curran, M. M., & Moran, D. (2007). Impact of the FTSE4Good Index on firm price: An event study. Journal of environmental management, 82(4), 529-537.
    15. Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87-109.
    16. Di Giuli, A., & Kostovetsky, L. (2014). Are red or blue companies more likely to go green? Politics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics, 111(1), 158-180.
    17. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial economics, 101(3), 621-640.
    18. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388-2406.
    19. Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585-606.
    20. Friedman, M.(1970, September). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.
    21. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business & society, 36(1), 5-31.
    22. Jensen, M. (2001). Value maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European financial management, 7(3), 297-317.
    23. Jensen, M. C. & Meckling W. (1976).Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 33,305-360.
    24. Jensen, M. C. & Ruback, R. ( 1983). The Market for Corporate Control: the Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
    25. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880
    26. Lipton, M. and Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59-77.
    27. Martin, R. L. (2002). The virtue matrix: Calculating the return on corporate responsibility. Harvard business review, 80(3), 68-75.
    28. Martinez‐Blasco, M., Garcia‐Blandon, J., & Castillo‐Merino, D. (2017). Are Investors Concerned by Annual Corporate Governance Reports? Some Evidence from the Spanish Stock Market. European Management Review.
    29. Maxfield, S. (2008). Reconciling corporate citizenship and competitive strategy: Insights from economic theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 367-377.
    30. McGregor, D,(1960) ,The Human Side of Enterprise, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    31. Middlemiss, N. (2003). Authentic not cosmetic: CSR as brand enhancement. The journal of brand management, 10(4), 353-361.
    32. Mollet, J. C., & Ziegler, A. (2014). Socially responsible investing and stock performance: New empirical evidence for the US and European stock markets. Review of Financial Economics, 23(4), 208-216.
    33. Morck, R., Shleifer , A. , & Vishny, R. W.(1988). Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
    34. Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180-193.
    35. Oberndorfer, U., Schmidt, P., Wagner, M., & Ziegler, A. (2013). Does the stock market value the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? An event study analysis for German firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 66(3), 497-509.
    36. Paul M. Guest(2009) The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK The European Journal of Finance, Volume 15, Issue 4, June 2009, Pages 385-404
    37. Pearce, J. A. and Zahra, S. A. (1992). Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29(4), 53-58.
    38. Rappaport, A. (1986). Creating shareholder value: the new standard for business performance. Free press.
    39. Shapiro, C., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device. The American Economic Review, 74(3), 433-444.
    40. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic management journal, 31(5), 463-490.
    41. Utrero-González, N., & Callado-Muñoz, F. J. (2016). Do investors react to corporate governance news? An empirical analysis for the Spanish market. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(1), 13-25.
    42. Van Stekelenburg , A., Georgakopoulos, G., Sotiropoulou, V., Vasileiou, K. Z., & Vlachos, I. (2015). The relation between sustainability performance and stock market returns: an empirical analysis of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index Europe. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(7), 74.
    43. Yermack, D. (1996). Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40(2), 185–212.
    44. Zhang, L., Wang, T. N., & Fung, H. G. (2014). Market reaction to corporate social responsibility announcements: Evidence from China. China & World Economy, 22(2), 81-101.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    105357007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1053570071
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    007101.pdf769KbAdobe PDF219View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback