政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/117633
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51833671      線上人數 : 543
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/117633


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117633


    題名: 關鍵查核事項之內涵價值
    The information content of key audit matters
    作者: 林佩瑩
    Lin, Pei Yin
    貢獻者: 金成隆
    林佩瑩
    Lin, Pei Yin
    關鍵詞: 新式查核報告
    風險權重
    產業專精
    關鍵查核事項
    四大會計師事務所
    New audit report
    Risk weight
    Industry specialization
    Key audit matters
    Big4
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-06-12 17:01:18 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究之目的為瞭解投資人對新式查核報告之因應。研究結果顯示關鍵查核事項項目數與股價呈現負相關，說明大部分投資人對關鍵查核事項之回應與關鍵查核事項之揭露呈現負相關。然而，當企業聘請四大會計師事務所或產業專精為期查核財務報告，結果將反轉。確切來說，相較非四大會計師事務所或非產業專精之查核客戶，財務報告經由四大會計師事務所或產業專精查核之企業，其累積異常報酬率較大。此外，本研究亦將產業專精分為三等級：會計師事務所層級、會計師個人層級及同時為事務所層級兼個人層級，以衡量關鍵查核事項與股價之關係。最後於敏感性分析之部分，以關鍵查核事項風險權重作為關鍵查核事項項目數之替代，並且以不同預期模式衡量累積異常報酬，結果都與預期相符。
    參考文獻: 沈中華與李建然，2000，事件研究法：財務與會計實證研究必備，華泰文化事業公司。
    邱茗囷，2015，國際審計監理議題重要趨勢，證券暨期貨月刊，第三十三卷第七期，
    15-27。
    官月緞與張家豪，2010，力霸事件對審計客戶股價影響之實證研究，會計與公司治理，
    第七卷第二期，19-46。
    徐永堅，2016，審計準則公報第五十八號「查核報告中關 鍵查核事項之溝通」之內容、
    影響與建議，證券暨期貨月刊，第三十四卷第九期，30-41。
    陳耀宗、劉若蘭、林坤霖，2003，產業專家、客戶滿意度與審計公費關連性之研究，
    會計評論，第 37 期: 31-52。
    陳政芳與李啟華，2006。國內會計師產業知識之衡量基礎。中山管理評論，14(3)，
    685-711。
    劉嘉雯，2004，匯豐事件對審計客戶影響之實證研究，會計評論，第 39 期: 25-53。
    劉嘉雯，2003，會計師事務所合併對客戶股價影響之研究-代理假說與保險假說，會計
    評論，第 36 期: 1-22。
    Asare, S. K., and A. Wright. (2012). The effect of type of internal control report on users’
    confidence in the accompanying financial statement audit report. Contemporary
    Accounting Research 29(1), 152-175.
    Backof, A., K. Bowlin, and B. Goodson. (2016). The impact of proposed changes to the
    content of the audit report on jurors’ assessments of auditor negligence. Working paper,
    University of Virginia, The University of Mississippi, University of Cincinnati.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers.
    Journal of accounting research 159-178.
    Beck, P. J., and M. G. H. Wu. (2006). The impact of judgment enhancement strategies on
    audit quality and firm risk when clients have correlated business risks. Working paper,
    University of Illinois.
    Becker, C. L., DeFond, M. L., J
    35
    Boolaky, P. K., and R. Quick. (2016). Bank directors’ perceptions of expanded auditor`s
    reports. International Journal of Auditing 20(2), 158-174.
    Boone, J. P., Khurana, I. K., and K. K. Raman. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the second-tier
    firms provide audits of similar quality?. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4),
    330-352.
    Bradley P. L., V. O`Hara, and A. W. Spencer. (2017). Updates and comparisons regarding
    changes to the audit reporting model in the United States, United Kingdom, and
    European Union. The Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance:9-22.
    Brasel, K., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., and A. Reffett. (2016). Risk disclosure preceding
    negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of
    auditor liability. The Accounting Review 91(5), 1345-1362.
    Chaney, P. K., and K. L. Philipich. (2002). Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure.
    Journal of accounting research 40(4), 1221-1245.
    Chen, K. Y., and K. S. Wu. (2002). The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in
    Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper, National Cheng Kung University.
    Chen, K.Y., K., Lin and J., Zhou, (2005). “Audit quality and earnings management for
    Taiwan IPO firms”, Managerial Auditing Journal 20(1),86-104
    Chi, H. Y., and C. L. Chin. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry
    expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory
    30(2), 201-229.
    Chin, C. L., Yao, W. R., and P. Y. Liu. (2014). Industry audit experts and ownership
    structure in the syndicated loan market: at the firm and partner levels. Accounting
    Horizons 28(4), 749-768.
    Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise.
    Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3), 729–765.
    Chow, C. W. (1982). The demand for external auditing: size, debt and ownership influences.
    The Accounting Review 57 (4), 272-291.
    Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., and C. J. Wolfe. (2014). Do critical audit matter
    paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors` decision to invest?.
    Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33(4), 71-93..
    Church, B., S. Davis, and S. McCracken. (2008). The auditor’s reporting model: A literature
    overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1), 69–90.
    Clive Lennox. (2005). Management Ownership and Audit Firm Size. Contemporary
    36
    Accounting Research22(1), 206-227
    DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and
    Economics 3(3), 183-199.
    Dunn, K., and B. Mayhew. (2004). Audit firm industry specialization and client disclosure
    quality. Review of Accounting Studies 9 (March), 35-58.
    Francis, J.R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review
    36(4), 345-368.
    Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., and M. E. Ozlanski. (2016). The effects of critical audit matter
    paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting
    Review 91(6), 1629-1646
    Gimbar, C., Hansen, B. ,and M. E. Ozlanski. (2016). The effects of critical audit matter
    paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting
    Review 91(6), 1629-1646.
    Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K. W., and M. Vulcheva. (2016). Consequences of
    changing the auditor’s report: Evidence from the UK. Working Paper, Universidad de
    Chile, University of Miami, and Florida International University. 2016. Website,
    https://papers. ssrn. com/sol3/papers. cfm.
    Habib, A., and M. B. U. Bhuiyan. (2011). Audit firm industry specialization and the audit
    report lag. Journal of international accounting, auditing and taxation 20(1), 32-44.
    Hammersley, J. S. (2006). Pattern identification and industry-specialist auditors. The
    Accounting Review 81(2), 309-336.
    Jang, H. –Y. J., and C.-J. Lin. (1993). Audit quality and trading volume reaction: A study of
    initial public offering of stocks. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 12, 263-287.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,
    agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4), 305-360.
    Kachelmeier, S. J., Schmidt, J. J., and K. Valentine. (2017). The disclaimer effect of
    disclosing critical audit matters in the auditor’s report.
    Karjalainen, J. (2011). “Audit quality and cost of debt Capital for private firms: evidence
    from Finland”, International Journal of Auditing 15(1), 88-108.
    Kellogg, R. L. (1984). Accounting activities, security prices, and class action lawsuits.
    Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 (3), 185-204.
    Kim, J. B., and B. Y. Song. (2011). Auditor quality and loan syndicate structure. Auditing:
    37
    A Journal of Practice & Theory 30 (4), 71–99.
    King, R. R., S. M. Davis, and N. Mintchik. (2012). Mandatory disclosure of the engagement
    partner’s identity: Potential benefits and unintended consequences. Accounting
    Horizon 26 (3), 533–561.
    Kipp, P. C. (2017). The Effect of Expanded Audit Report Disclosures on Users` Confidence
    in the Audit and the Financial Statements (Doctoral dissertation, University of South
    Florida).
    Kwon, S.Y., C.Y. Lim, and P. Tan. (2007). Legal systems and earnings quality: The role of
    auditor industry specialization. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 26(2),
    25-55.
    Lennox, C. S., Schmidt, J. J., and A. Thompson. (2017). Is the expanded model of audit
    reporting informative to investors? Evidence from the UK.
    Li, H. A., Hay, D., and D. Lau. (2018). Assessing the Impact of the New Auditor`s Report
    LIM, C. Y., and H. T. TAN. (2008). Non‐audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of
    auditor specialization. Journal of accounting research 46(1), 199-246.
    Mayhew, B. W., and M. S. Wilkins. (2003). Audit firm industry specialization as a
    differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Auditing: A
    Journal of Practice & Theory 22, 33–52.
    Merchant, H., and D. Schendel. (2000). How do international joint venture screate
    shareholder value? Strategic Management Journal 21 (7), 723–37.
    Mock, T., J. Bedard, P. Coram, S. Davis, R. Espahbodi, and R. Warne. (2013). The Audit
    Reporting Model: Current Research Synthesis and Implications. Auditing: A Journal of
    Practice and Theory 32 (1), 323-351.
    Pelzer, J. R. E. (2016). Understanding barriers to Critical Audit Matter effectiveness: A
    qualitative and experimental approach (Doctoral dissertation, The Florida State
    University).
    Pratt, J., and J. D. Stice. (1994). The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk
    judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. Accounting Review,
    639-656.
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2009). Requiring the
    Engagement Partner to Sign the Audit Report. Concept Release No. 2009-005.
    Available at:
    http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket029/2009-07-28_Release_No_2009-005.p
    38
    df
    Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2011). Improving the
    Transparency of Audits: Proposed Amendments to PCAOB Auditing Standards and
    Form 2. Concept Release No. 2011-007. Available at:
    http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket029/PCAOB_Release_2011-007.pdf
    Reichelt, K. J., and D. Wang. (2010). National and office‐specific measures of auditor
    industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research 48(3),
    647-686.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients
    on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of accounting and economics 30(3),
    375-400.
    Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. (1990). Audit risk in a client portfolio context.
    Contemporary Accounting Research 6 (2), 329–343.
    Simunic, D.A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence.Journal of
    Accounting Research22,161-190
    Sirois, L. P., Bédard, J., and P. Bera. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in
    the auditor`s report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons.
    St. Pierre, K., and J. A. Anderson. (1984). A analysis of the factors associated with lawsuits
    against public accountants. The Accounting Review 59 (2), 242-263.
    Stice, J. D. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement
    factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review 66 (3),
    516-533.
    Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response
    coefficient. Accounting Review, 346-366.
    Titman, S., and B. Trueman. (1986). Information quality and the valuation of new issues.
    Journal of accounting and economics 8(2), 159-172.
    Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
    Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden.
    Contemporary Accounting Research 29 (1),
    312–340
    Zhou, J., and R. Elder. (2001). Audit firm size, industry specialization and earnings
    management by initial public offering firms. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NYand
    39
    SUNY. Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, Working Paper.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    105353029
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105353029
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋