Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/117464
|
Title: | 企業併購的動態競爭分析 ─ 以台灣半導體封測廠商日月光與矽品合併為例 Dynamic Competition Analysis in M&A – A Case Study of ASE-SPIL Merger |
Authors: | 賴品中 |
Contributors: | 許牧彥 Hsu, Mu-Yen 賴品中 |
Keywords: | 動態競爭 市場共同性 資源相似性 察覺 - 動機 - 能力觀點 高階經營團隊 非合意併購 封測產業 Dynamic competition Market commonality Resource similarity AMC theory Top management team Hostile takeover OSAT industry |
Date: | 2018 |
Issue Date: | 2018-06-01 18:12:26 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 2016年全球半導體產值約 3,270 億美元,台灣半導體產值佔全球的23%,繼續蟬聯全球第二大半導體產業大國,排行僅次於美國。此外,台灣以出口為導向,根據我國財政部統計,2017上半年積體電路出口金額占整體出口總值的27.6%,是我國最主要的出口產品,可見半導體產業對台灣的影響力不言而喻。
近年來半導體併購浪潮興起,台灣廠商也無法置身事外,最受矚目非日月光與矽品的非合意併購案莫屬。一般學術論文對於非合意併購案的探討,著重於併購前的動機與併購後的綜效,鮮少討論雙方在併購過程中的攻防。故本研究欲以動態競爭觀點,並考量政府對併購成敗的影響,來找出矽品最後同意日月光共組控股公司之提案的原因,並分析此合併案對全球封測產業所造成的影響。
本研究發現雙方在合併前,應用產品及地區的市場共同性,分別呈現上升及下降趨勢,透過收購矽品,日月光不僅能追趕其主要競爭對手在車用電子的領先地位,更可以降低營收過度集中於北美的風險。另外,雙方在台灣及中國的專利申請數量有下降趨勢,但在美國專利的申請數有明顯增加且資源相似性也呈上升趨勢,故推論日月光收購矽品可鞏固其在北美市場的領導地位。總而言之,雖然日矽合併案被外界視為雙贏結果,但客戶轉單、中國商務部的限制條件及收購溢價偏高可能使得此合併綜效有限。在面對中國封測產商崛起、封測產業的市場集中度上升及半導體產業中下游界限越來越不明確的情況下,雙方合併為必然之勢。 The worldwide semiconductor market grew 1.1% in 2016 to $338.9 billion USD, in which Taiwan accounts for 23% of the total output. Taiwan continues to rank as the world`s second largest semiconductor industry, with the first being America. Taiwan is export oriented, and from the statistical data provided by the Ministry of Finance, the shipment of integrated circuit exports accounted for 27.6% of gross export value in the first two quarters of 2017. This indicates that integrated circuit is an important export product and that the semiconductor industry is of great importance to Taiwan.
The recent and unprecedented M&A waves in the semiconductor industry caused major changes and created impact on Taiwanese semiconductor firm. The recent case that drew most attention is the M&A between ASE (Advanced Semiconductor Engineering, Inc.) and SPIL (Siliconware Precision Industries Co., Ltd). While most academic theses focus on the acquiring firm’s motive and post-M&A synergy, the offense and defense strategies during the M&A process are rarely explored. This research aims to focus on reasons why SPIL agreed on ASE’s proposal to form a joint venture holding company and the impact on the global OSAT (Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test) industry after this M&A. This thesis utilized the dynamic competitive perspective and identifies government’s impact on M&A.
The study finds that before the merger, the commonality of product shows an upward trend while the commonality of region market presents a downward direction. This merger not only assists ASE to catch up with its leading competitors in the automotive electronics sectors, but also reduce the revenue concentration risk, given that its major sales is in North America. In addition, the number of patents filed by both companies in Taiwan and China has declined, but the number in the United States has increased significantly along with an escalating resource similarity. Therefore, the research concludes that the acquisition of SPIL can consolidate ASE’s leading position in the North American market. To sum up, the merger of ASE and SPIL is regarded as win-win outcome. However, the M&A has risks, such as customer attrition, restriction from The Ministry of Commerce of the People`s Republic of China (MOFCOM) and merger overpayment. Such uncertainties may reduce synergy. Nevertheless, in the face of the rise of China`s OSAT business, the market concentration of OSAT industry, and the increasingly unclear boundary between the middle and downstream firms, the merger of the two firms is inevitable. |
Reference: | 英文文獻 Agrawal, A., & Jaffe, J. F. (2003). Do takeover targets underperform? Evidence from operating and stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(4), 721-746. Ahmadi, M., Arasi, I. S., & Garajafary, M. (2012). Studying the relationship between working capital management and profitability at Tehran stock exchange: a case study of food industry. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4(13), 1868-1874. Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic management journal, 22(3), 197-220. Azémar, J. (2017). FAN-OUT: TECHNOLOGIES AND MARKET TRENDS 2017. Retrieved from https://www.i-micronews.com/images/Flyers/Advanced_Packaging/Yole_YDAP17036_Fan-out_Technnologies_and_Market_Trends.pdf Azemar, J. (2017). Fan-Out Packaging: Technologies and market trends. Paper presented at the Additional Conferences (Device Packaging, HiTEC, HiTEN, & CICMT). Bühner, R., Rashee, A., Rosenstein, J., & Yoshikawa, T. (1998). Research on corporate governance: A comparison of Germany, Japan, and United States. Advances in international comparative management, 12, 121-156. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic management journal, 10(S1), 107-124. Barker III, V. L., & Mueller, G. C. (2002). CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Management science, 48(6), 782-801. Barnett, W. P. (1997). The dynamics of competitive intensity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-160. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120. Baum, J. A., & Korn, H. J. (1999). Dynamics of dyadic competitive interaction. Strategic management journal, 251-278. Becker, M., & Thomas, S. (2010). The indirect effects of changes in industry concentration. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh. Bhagat, S., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W., Jarrel, G., & Summers, L. (1990). Hostile takeovers in the 1980s: The return to corporate specialization. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1990, 1-84. Bhagat, S., Bolton, B., & Subramanian, A. (2010). CEO education, CEO turnover, and firm performance. Bhattacharyya, S., & Nain, A. (2011). Horizontal acquisitions and buying power: A product market analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 99(1), 97-115. Cabolis, C., Manasakis, C., & Petrakis, E. (2008). Horizontal Mergers and Acqusitions with Endogenous Efficiency Gains, BENETeC Working Paper No. 0817. Heraklion, Greece: University of Crete. Cannella, A. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1993). Effects of executive departures on the performance of acquired firms. Strategic management journal, 14(S1), 137-152. Capron, L., Dussauge, P., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America, 1988-1992. Strategic management journal, 631-661. Cassiman, B., Colombo, M. G., Garrone, P., & Veugelers, R. (2005). The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological-and market-relatedness. Research Policy, 34(2), 195-220. Caves, R. E. (1984). Economic analysis and the quest for competitive advantage. The American economic review, 74(2), 127-132. Chaganti, R., & Sambharya, R. (1987). Strategic orientation and characteristics of upper management. Strategic management journal, 8(4), 393-401. Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). Organizational factors in post-acquisition performance. IEEE transactions on engineering management, 37(4), 259-268. Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic management journal, 7(2), 119-139. Chatterjee, S., Harrison, J. S., & Bergh, D. D. (2003). Failed takeover attempts, corporate governance and refocusing. Strategic management journal, 24(1), 87-96. Chemmanur, T. J., & Paeglis, I. (2005). Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 331-368. Chen, M.-J. (1996). Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of management review, 21(1), 100-134. Chen, M.-J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive dynamics: Themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135-210. Chen, M.-J., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1992). Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management science, 38(3), 439-455. Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (1994). Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: an expectancy‐valence framework. Strategic management journal, 15(2), 85-102. Cloodt, M., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kranenburg, H. (2006). Mergers and acquisitions: Their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries. Research Policy, 35(5), 642-654. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596. Conyon, M. J., Girma, S., Thompson, S., & Wright, P. W. (2001). Do hostile mergers destroy jobs? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 45(4), 427-440. Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of management Journal, 28(4), 749-762. Day, G. S. (1981). Strategic market analysis and definition: an integrated approach. Strategic management journal, 2(3), 281-299. DOJ-FTC, U. (2010). Horizontal Merger Guidelines, US Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. Ernst, H., & Vitt, J. (2000). The influence of corporate acquisitions on the behaviour of key inventors. R&D Management, 30(2), 105-120. Fairfield-Sonn, J. W., Ogilvie, J. R., & DelVecchio, G. A. (2002). Mergers, acquisitions and long-term employee attitudes. The Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 8(2), 1. Fee, C. E., & Thomas, S. (2004). Sources of gains in horizontal mergers: evidence from customer, supplier, and rival firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(3), 423-460. Ferrier, W. J. (2001). Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Academy of management Journal, 44(4), 858-877. Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly, 484-503. Finkelstein, S. (2009). The effects of strategic and market complementarity on acquisition performance: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry, 1989–2001. Strategic management journal, 30(6), 617-646. Galpin, T. J., & Herndon, M. (1999). The Complete Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions (pp. 107-108). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 654-681. Gerpott, T. J. (1995). Successful integration of R&D functions after acquisitions: An exploratory empirical study. R&D Management, 25(2), 161-178. Ghoshal, S. (1987). Global strategy: An organizing framework. Strategic management journal, 8(5), 425-440. Giammarino, R. M., & Heinkel, R. L. (1986). A model of dynamic takeover behavior. The Journal of Finance, 41(2), 465-480. Gole, W. J., & Hilger, P. J. (2009). Due diligence: an M&A value creation approach (Vol. 476): John Wiley & Sons. Goll, I., Brown Johnson, N., & Rasheed, A. A. (2008). Top management team demographic characteristics, business strategy, and firm performance in the US airline industry: The role of managerial discretion. Management Decision, 46(2), 201-222. Goll, I., Sambharya, R. B., & Tucci, L. A. (2001). Top management team composition, corporate ideology, and firm performance. MIR: Management International Review, 109-129. Gorzala, J. (2010), The art of hostile takeover defence: the roadmap to fighting corporate raiders, Lexington, KY: IGEL VERLAG. Granstrand, O. (1999). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property. Cheltanham, UK: Edward Elgar. Guillén, M. F. (2000). Corporate governance and globalization: is there convergence across countries? Advances in international comparative management, 13, 175-204. Hagedoorn, J., & Duysters, G. (2002). The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(1), 67-85. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M.-J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms` competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 659-684. Hambrick, D. C., & D`Aveni, R. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management science, 38(10), 1445-1466. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of management review, 9(2), 193-206. Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. (1991). Synergies and post-acquisition performance: Differences versus similarities in resource allocations. Journal of management, 17(1), 173-190. Hayward, M. L. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995. Strategic management journal, 23(1), 21-39. Hayward, M. L., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). Explaining the premiums paid for large acquisitions: Evidence of CEO hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly, 103-127. Hequet, M. (1994). Teams at the top. Training, 31(4), 7-9. Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69-78. Hill, C., & Jones, G. (2012). Strategic management theory: An integrated approach (10 th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Hirsch, P. M. (1986). From ambushes to golden parachutes: Corporate takeovers as an instance of cultural framing and institutional integration. American journal of Sociology, 91(4), 800-837. Hitt, M., Ireland, R., & Hoskisson, R. (2007). Strategic management: Globalization and competitiveness. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of management Journal, 39(5), 1084-1119. Hsu, M.-Y., & Chen, M.-J. (2006). Competitor Analysis and Inter-Firm Rivalry: by integrating market commonality and resource similarity. Darden Graduate School of Business, University of Virginia. Huang, L., Shang, L., Wang, K., Porter, A. L., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Identifying Targets for Technology Mergers and Acquisitions Using Patent Information and Semantic Analysis Anticipating Future Innovation Pathways Through Large Data Analysis (pp. 173-186): Springer. Hunt, P. (2004). Structuring Mergers and Acquisitions: A guide to creating shareholder value. (2^nd ed). New York: Aspen Publishers. Hutchison, P. D., Farris II, M. T., & Anders, S. B. (2007). Cash-to-cash analysis and management. The CPA Journal, 77(8), 42. Insights, I. (2017). Samsung Forecast to Top Intel as the #1 Semiconductor Supplier in 2017. Retrieved from http://www.icinsights.com/data/articles/documents/1029.pdf Ivankovic, A. (2016). FAN-IN PACKAGING: BUSINESS UPDATE 2016. Retrieved from https://www.i-micronews.com/images/Flyers/Advanced_Packaging/Yole_Fan-In_Packaging_Business_update_November_2016_Flyer_web.pdf Ivankovic, A. (2017). Status of the Advanced Packaging Industry 2017. Retrieved from https://www.i-micronews.com/images/Flyers/Advanced_Packaging/YDAP17020_Status_of_Advanced_Packaging_Report_June_2017_Flyer.pdf Jain, S., Lim, C.-C., Gan, B.-P., & Low, Y.-H. (1999). Criticality of detailed modeling in semiconductor supply chain simulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 31st conference on Winter simulation: Simulation---a bridge to the future-Volume 1. Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50. Jensen, M. C. (1988). Takeovers: Their causes and consequences. Journal of economic perspectives, 2(1), 21-48. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194. Katila, R., & Chen, E. L. (2008). Effects of search timing on innovation: The value of not being in sync with rivals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4), 593-625. King, D. R., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Kesner, I. (2008). Performance implications of firm resource interactions in the acquisition of R&D-intensive firms. Organization science, 19(2), 327-340. Kitching, J. (1967). Why do mergers miscarry. Harvard Business Review, 45(6), 84-101. Koller, T. (2005). Core Issue is Creating Values after M&As. Economic Times Daily {September 27), 7. Krishnan, H. A., Miller, A., & Judge, W. Q. (1997). Diversification and top management team complementarity: Is performance improved by merging similar or dissimilar teams? Strategic management journal, 361-374. Krishnan, R. A., Joshi, S., & Krishnan, H. (2004). The influence of mergers on firms` product‐mix strategies. Strategic management journal, 25(6), 587-611. Kroener, P. H., & Kroener, M. H. (1991). Towards more successful mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Technology Management, 6(1-2), 33-40. Lajoux, A. R.,& Elson, C.M. (2000). Art of M&A Due Diligence: Navigating Critical Steps & Uncovering Crucial Data. New York: McGraw Hill. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 461-477. Leonard‐Barton, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125. Lubatkin, M. (1983). Mergers and the Performance of the Acquiring Firm. Academy of management review, 8(2), 218-225. Luo, J., Guo, C., & Hu, S. (2017). Defense Strategies of Listed Companies under Hostile Takeover: A Case Study. Makri, M., Hitt, M. A., & Lane, P. J. (2010). Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions. Strategic management journal, 31(6), 602-628. Manne, H. G. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political economy, 73(2), 110-120. Marks, M. L., & Mirvis, P. H. (1986). The merger syndrome-when companies combine, a clash of cultures can turn potentially good business alliances into financial disasters. Psychology today, 20(10), 37-42. Massey, P. (2000). Market definition and market power in competition analysis: some practical issues. Economic and Social Review, 31(4), 309-328. Massimo, G., & Larissa, R. (2014). Technological Similarity, Post-acquisition R&D Reorganization, and Innovation Performance in Horizontal Acquisitions. Research Policy, 43, 1039-1054. Matsushima, Noriaki, Yasuhiro Sato, and Kazuhiro Yamamoto. 2013. Horizontal mergers, firm heterogeneity, and R&D investments. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 13, 959-990. McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic management journal, 26(11), 1033-1055. Mellen, C. M., & Evans, F. C. (2010). Valuation for M&A: Building value in private companies (Vol. 587). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of management Journal, 35(1), 9-37. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy safari: Your complete guide through the wilds of strategic management. Pearson Education Limited, Upper Saddle River. Morris, R. D. (1987). Signalling, agency theory and accounting policy choice. Accounting and business Research, 18(69), 47-56. Moss, J. D., & Stine, B. (1993). Cash conversion cycle and firm size: a study of retail firms. Managerial Finance, 19(8), 25-34. Norburn, D., & Birley, S. (1988). The top management team and corporate performance. Strategic management journal, 9(3), 225-237. O`Sullivan, M. (2000). The innovative enterprise and corporate governance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(4), 393-416. O`Sullivan, M. (2003). The political economy of comparative corporate governance. Review of International Political Economy, 10(1), 23-72. Öberg, C., & Holtström, J. (2006). Are mergers and acquisitions contagious? Journal of Business Research, 59(12), 1267-1275. Papadakis, V. M., & Barwise, P. (2002). How much do CEOs and top managers matter in strategic decision‐making? British Journal of Management, 13(1), 83-95. Pearl, J., & Rosenbaum, J. (2013). Investment banking: valuation, leveraged buyouts, and mergers and acquisition. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. (1997). European patterns of corporate ownership: A twelve-country study. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(4), 759-778. Peteraf, M. A., & Bergen, M. E. (2003). Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market‐based and resource‐based framework. Strategic management journal, 24(10), 1027-1041. Porac, J. F., & Thomas, H. (1990). Taxonomic mental models in competitor definition. Academy of management review, 15(2), 224-240. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competition. New York, 300, 28. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press. Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of management Journal, 49(2), 263-280. pwc. (2017). China`s impact on the semiconductor industry: 2016 (pp. 4). Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/technology/chinas-impact-on-semiconductor-industry/assets/china-impact-of-the-semiconductor-industry-2016-update.pdf Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of business, 197-216. Rosett, J. (1990). Do Breaches Explain Takeover Premiums? The Evidence on Union Wages. Journal of Financial Economics, 27, 263-282. Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., Cavusgil, S. T., & Aulakh, P. S. (2001). The influence of complementarity, compatibility, and relationship capital on alliance performance. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 29(4), 358-373. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and market performance. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, USA. Schwert, G. W. (2000). Hostility in takeovers: in the eyes of the beholder? The Journal of Finance, 55(6), 2599-2640. Sears, J., & Hoetker, G. (2014). Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic management journal, 35(1), 48-67. Shahrur, H. (2005). Industry structure and horizontal takeovers: Analysis of wealth effects on rivals, suppliers, and corporate customers. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(1), 61-98. Shimizu, K., Hitt, M. A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of international management, 10(3), 307-353. Shleifer, A., & Summers, L. H. (1988). Breach of trust in hostile takeovers Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences (pp. 33-68): University of Chicago Press. SIA. (2017). Global Sales Report. from Semiconductor Industry Association SIA. Retrieved from https://www.semiconductors.org/industry_statistics/global_sales_report/ Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic management journal, 8(4), 377-386. Song, J. H. (1982). Diversification strategies and the experience of top executives of large firms. Strategic management journal, 3(4), 377-380. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460-501. TSIA. (2017a). Overview on Taiwan Semiconductor Industry (2017th ed.). Hsinchu, Taiwan: Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Association. Walsh, J. P. (1988). Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions. Strategic management journal, 9(2), 173-183. Walsh, J. P. (1989). Doing a deal: Merger and acquisition negotiations and their impact upon target company top management turnover. Strategic management journal, 10(4), 307-322. Walter, G. A., & Barney, J. B. (1990). Research notes and communications management objectives in mergers and acquisitions. Strategic management journal, 11(1), 79-86. Wang, S.-F., & Huang, C.-H. (2010). White Knights, Hostile Takeovers and Shareholders. 臺大管理論叢, 21(1), 113-136. Weber, Y. (1996). Corporate cultural fit and performance in mergers and acquisitions. Human relations, 49(9), 1181-1202. Wiersema, M. F., & Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of management Journal, 35(1), 91-121. Williamson, O. E. (1968). Economies as an antitrust defense: The welfare tradeoffs. The American economic review, 58(1), 18-36. Young, G., Smith, K. G., & Grimm, C. M. (1996). “Austrian” and industrial organization perspectives on firm-level competitive activity and performance. Organization science, 7(3), 243-254. 中文文獻 pwc資誠、台灣併購與私募股權協會 (2017)。2017台灣併購白皮書。取自https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/assets/2017-taiwan-mna.pdf TSIA (2017b)。台灣半導體產業協會(TSIA) 2017Q3 全年台灣IC產業營運成果出爐新聞稿。2017年12月3日,取自http://www.tsia.org.tw/news_list.php?page=1 王玉慧、吳艾琳 (2011)。高階經理團隊多元化與企業績效。陳明園(主持人),公司治理。第十七屆人力資源管理實務與研究成果發表會,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。 伍忠賢 (2013)。企業併購:理論與實務。臺北市:新陸。 曲威光 (2013)。積體電路與微積電產業。臺北市:新陸。 朱延智 (2014)。高科技產業分析 (第三版)。臺北市:五南。 朱博湧、鄧美貞、黃基鴻 (2005)。垂直整合與虛擬整合商業模式之績效比較:台灣積體電路産業實證。交大管理學報,25(1),1-27。 沈靜蕙 (2015)。台灣封裝測試業競爭策略及未來展望。國立中興大學高階經理人碩士在職專班碩士論文,台中市。 吳述微 (2003)。QS9000 應用於半導體產業供應商管理架構之研究-以設計公司為例。遠東學報,20(2),283-300。 吳冠昌 (2010)。高階管理階層教育特質與公司績效之關聯性。東海大學會計研究所碩士論文,台中市。 吳啟銘 (2001)。企業評價:個案實證分析。臺北市:智勝文化。 吳淑美 (2016)。由封測大廠併購事件看兩岸半導體產業競合態勢-工研院 (IEK) 專題演講活動報導。證券服務,648,85-88。 吳博聰 (2017)。我國非合意併購實務案例暨攻防策略簡介。證券服務,658,36-44。 汪沁 (2002)。企業併購及其相關法律問題之研究。國防管理學院法律研究所碩士論文,桃園縣。 周士雄、富士Chimera總研 (2017)。扇出型封裝(FO-WLP)的採用動向與未來展望。臺北市:資策會產業情報研究所 MIC。 林姈潓 (2010)。企業併購個案之研究:以群創光電併購奇美電子為例。國立中正大學研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。 邱奕嘉、曾為國 (2014)。技術相關程度對技術併購影響之研究。管理與系統,21(2),187-222。 侯勝宗、連婉茜 (2017)。研發聯盟的動態競合管理:以中鋼為例。科技管理學刊,22(1),29-65。 洪啟仁 (2008)。企業併購交易指南:策略、模式、評估與整合。臺北市:安侯企管。 涂輝忠 (2015)。2015年全球暨台灣封測產業回顧與展望。臺北市:資策會產業情報研究所 MIC。 涂輝忠 (2016)。全球SiP發展趨勢分析。臺北市:資策會產業情報研究所 MIC。 梁立衡、游馨慧、李慧珊 (2007)。台灣企業併購歐洲企業之成功關鍵因素分析-以明碁併購西門子為例。全球管理與經濟,3(1),69-94。 莊蕎安 (2007)。敵意併購風起-謀求股東最大福利兼顧相關人等權益。會計研究月刊,254,28-33。 許杏宜 (2015)。敵意併購之防禦: 從日月光敵意併購矽品談起。會計研究月刊,360,90-97。 許牧彥 (2016)。加己減異、加異減己 ─ 專利佈署的全方位競爭策略。載於中華民國科技管理學會(編),2016中華民國科技管理研討會論文集(101頁)。臺北市:中華民國科技管理學會。 陳佑寰 (2013)。離開或留下?企業併購的人資與法律。會計研究月刊,334,102-109。 陳明哲 (2009)。預測競爭對手的回應:AMC三環透視法。未出版之原始資料。 陳明哲 (2012a)。察覺-動機-能力:細解AMC分析法(一)。哈佛商業評論,77,30-31。 陳明哲 (2012b)。“贏”在動態競爭中的“四部曲”。清華管理評論,2,74-80。 陳則銘 (2004)。企業併購之相關智慧財產管理策略與法律規劃研究-以併購美國高科技公司時之專利查核評估探微。國立政治大學智慧財產研究所碩士論文,臺北市。 陳彥良 (2014)。企業併購中目標公司之董事責任。臺北大學法學論叢,89,231-292。 陳柏宇 (2017)。全球半導體封裝測試產業研發效率與獲利效率及其影響因子分析。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文,臺北市。 陳琪 (1993)。美國反托拉斯法之簡介。公平交易季刊,1(4),45-67。 喬友慶、蕭櫓、黃俊儒、廖仲威 (2012)。廠商採取市場導向行為會有較佳的績效嗎? 動態競爭觀點。臺大管理論叢,22(2),27-58。 黃日燦 (2012)。黃日燦看併購:臺灣企業脫胎換骨的賽局。臺北市:經濟日報。 黃志宇 (2016)。高階封裝技術之發展與應用。臺北市:拓墣產業研究所 TRI。 黃偉峰 (2002)。併購實務的第一本書。臺北市:商周。 黃國峯 (2006)。藍海策略的省思。2018年2月16日,取自http://kfhuang-strategy.blogspot.tw/2006/04/ 楊千旻 (2012)。高科技產業之專利布局與策略聯盟。專利師,11,115-136。 楊啟鑫 (2016)。物聯網暨先進扇出型封裝技術現況及未來發展趨勢剖析。工業材料,354,140-150。 資策會 (2017)。2017年台灣半導體產業地圖描繪。臺北市:資策會產業情報研究所 MIC。 熊嘉彬 (2017)。2017年全球封測產回顧與展望。臺北市:資策會產業情報研究所 MIC。 劉連煜 (2012)。敵意併購下目標公司董事的受任人(受託)義務-以開發金控敵意併購金鼎證券為例。政大法學評論,125,1-53。 蔡英欣 (2009)。股東表決權分配之規範模式。臺大法學論叢,38(2),71-129。 蔡燕 (2017)。高階管理團隊組成性質與雙元性創新之關係研究:以台灣資訊科技產業為例。南臺科技大學管理與資訊系工業管理研究所碩士論文,台南市。 賴怡君 (2009)。企業併購之宣告效果、盈餘管理及併購後績效之研究。國立高雄第一科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。 韓宗憲、宋皇志 (2016)。以動態競爭觀點探討億光電子與日亞化學之專利競爭行動。載於中華民國科技管理學會(編),2016中華民國科技管理研討會論文集(52頁)。臺北市:中華民國科技管理學會。 |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 科技管理與智慧財產研究所 104364116 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104364116 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
411601.pdf | 3148Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 2977 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|