English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114105/145137 (79%)
Visitors : 52178260      Online Users : 135
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/116742


    Title: 戰前東洋史學之觀念與知識系譜
    Ideology and Knowledge Genealogy of Pre-war Touyoushigaku (Japanese Sinology)
    Authors: 邵軒磊
    Shao, Hsuan-Lei
    Keywords: 中國研究;日本;知識系譜;東洋史;漢學
    academic community;China-studies;genealogy;Japan;knowledge;Sinology
    Date: 2012-12
    Issue Date: 2018-04-09 10:56:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近代日本對中國研究在方法論上的突破，在於建立「東洋學」，首次以實證方法研究中國，並成為面對當時現實中國主要的知識來源；但另一方面，對於東洋學之特色以及其評價，在學界卻產生數種不同甚至針鋒相對的意見。本文試圖回溯其思想源流並且藉由知識系譜（disciplinary genealogy）的方法，對其學科的誕生與演變重新反思。本文分別討論「儒學到東洋學、東京／京都學派、學科講座建立、國策調查方法」等等子題；發現東洋學在觀念史的意義上，主要的變遷動力為「學科現代化／全球化、學術群體、近代國策需要」。本文並提出東洋學的建立，放在將「中國他者化」的延長線上，有作為「對象物與對照物」兩種他者典範，這兩種典範在戰後分別成立了不同的研究理念（問題意識）系譜，也造成現今學者對此一學科的各種分歧觀點。
    The major change of modern China-studies in Japan is the disciplinary establishment of ”Touyougaku (Japanese orientalogy)” as its cognitional methodology. It is the first decipline which adopts the empirical research approach to ”China.” Hence, it became the main source of knowledge of ”real China” in that era. On the other hand, the opinions on Touyougaku`s historical value are quite different and even conflicting. This paper declares that we should trace back to the knowledge`s origins and study its pedigree (disciplinary genealogy). It focuses on the creation and evolution in disciplinary characteristics. The paper elaborates the major driving forces of Touyougaku, which are ”discipline modernization/globalization, academic groups interaction, and policy request.” and analyzing Jugaku (Confucianism) source, Tokyo/Kyoto school, the seminar establishment, and policy survey. It also proposes the Touyougaku makes China as the existence of ”the other”, under which forms the sub-paradigm of ”object” and another sub-paradigm of ”collation.” The two various paradigms develop different theory models in post-war, which cause scholars to maintain different views in Touyougaku.
    Relation: 東亞觀念史集刊, 3, P335 - 337+339
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[東亞觀念史集刊] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    3-8.pdf3441KbAdobe PDF2253View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback