English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51731182      Online Users : 605
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/115933


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115933


    Title: Disclosure Duty of Proposer and Incontestable Clause in Simple Life Insurance
    簡易人壽保險中要保人之告知義務與保險人解除權之除斥期間--臺灣高等法院高雄分院103年度保險上易字第4號評析
    Authors: 葉啟洲
    Yeh, Chi-Chou
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: duty of disclosure;cancellation right;contestable period;simple life insurance
    duty of disclosure;cancellation right;contestable period;simple life insurance
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2018-02-08 16:25:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 簡易人壽保險法中關於要保人訂約時的告知義務，設有與保險法相類似但不盡相同的規定。就保險人解除權的除斥期間，簡易人壽保險法規定「自保險契約訂立或恢復保險契約效力至保險事故發生日滿2年，即有可以解除之原因，亦不得解除保險契約」。若保險事故發生於訂約後2年之內，而保險人於訂約屆滿2年時始解除契約，則適用簡易人壽保險法或適用保險法的結果，可能有所不同。近來臺灣高等法院高雄分院有一則案例，一、二審法院對上述問題有不同見解。本文研究結果，認為簡易人壽保險法屬特別規定，應優先保險法而適用。保險人於訂約後已逾2年時，仍得解除契約。
    The provision regarding proposer`s disclosure duty in Simple Life Insurance Act is similar to Insurance Act Article 64, but actually different. For contestable period aspect, Simple Life Insurance Act provides that ＂If the insured event occurs two years after the conclusion of the contract, the insurer may not cancel the insurance contract.＂ Supposed the insured event has been occurred within contestable period (two years), and insurer cancelled on the date which has been expired. It would be attributed to different decisions, depending on whether to be applicable to Simple Life Insurance Act or Insurance Act. Recently, the first and second instances in Taiwan Kaohsiung District Court & Taiwan High Court Kaohsiung Branch are sentencing disparity on the above-mentioned issue. This Article concluded that Simple Life Insurance Act is prior applicable to Insurance Act, insurer would cancel the insurance contract, even if contestable period has been expired.
    Relation: 保險專刊, Vol.30, No.4, pp.403-418
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2498View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback