政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/115804

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/115804

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51622514 Online Users : 562

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Informatics > Department of Computer Science > Theses > Item 140.119/115804

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115804

Title:	可搜尋式加密和密文相等性驗證 Searchable encryption and equality test over ciphertext
Authors:	黃凱彬 Huang, Kaibin
Contributors:	左瑞麟 Tso, Raylin 黃凱彬 Huang, Kaibin
Keywords:	密文運算公開金鑰密碼安全證明密文相等性驗證可搜尋式加密基於通行碼的認證系統 Ciphertext computation Public key encryption Security proof Equality test Searchable encryption Password-authenticated systems
Date:	2018
Issue Date:	2018-02-05 11:24:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文深入探討許多基於公開金鑰密碼和通行碼的密文運算方案。首先第一個主題是「公開金鑰密碼」，從其基本架構和安全定義開始，透過文獻探討逐步地討論公開金鑰密碼學的各項特性、以及討論公開金鑰密碼中兩個常見的密文運算：同態加密系統和可交換性加密系統。同態運算是針對同一把公鑰加密的不同密文間的運算：兩個以同一把公鑰加密的密文可以在不解密的前提下進行運算，進而成為另一個合法密文。這個密文運算的結果等同於兩個明文做運算後再以該公鑰加密。可交換性加密系統是一個容許重複的加密系統：已用甲方公鑰加密的密文可以再度用乙方公鑰再加密，進而之成一個多收件者的密文。第一個主題圍繞著這兩個密文運算的技巧討論相關的加密方案。接下來第二個研究的的主題是「基於公開金鑰密碼之密文相等性驗證」，「密文相等性驗證」是密文運算中一個基礎但重要的功能，經授權的測試者可以在不解密密文的前提下，驗證兩個加密後的訊息是否相等。此外，除了相等或不相等之外，測試者無法得知密文中的其他訊息。「基於公開金鑰密碼之密文相等性驗證」相當於在「公開金鑰密碼」的基礎上，再加上「授權」和「密文相等性驗證」的功能。其中「授權」的範圍和「授權」的設計，直接影響到該方案的實用性及安全性，本文提出三個關於「授權」的主題：「單一密文授權」、「相容性授權」和「語意安全授權」。第三個研究主題是「可搜尋式加密系統」，常被應用於以下情境：使用者一個檔案及數個「關鍵字」進行加密，然後儲存在雲端伺服器上。當使用者想要對加密檔案進行關鍵字搜尋時，他可以自訂幾個想搜尋的「關鍵字」並對雲端伺服器發出搜尋要求。在收到搜尋要求後，雖然關鍵字都是加密儲存，仍可利用「可搜尋式加密」技巧將符合關鍵字搜尋的檔案傳回給收件者。整個過程中檔案和關鍵字都被加密保護，伺服器無法得知其儲存及搜尋內容。本文提出兩個「可搜尋式加密系統」，分別是「子集合式多關鍵字可搜尋式加密系統」和「基於通行碼的可搜尋式加密系統」。 This dissertation addresses the research about ciphertext computation skills over public key encryption and password-authenticated cryptosystems. The first topic is related to the public key encryption, the framework and security notions for public key encryption are revised; and two common ciphertext-computable public key encryptions including homomorphic encryption and commutative encryption are following discussed. The homomorphic encryption denotes computations over ciphertexts encrypted using the same public key. The homomorphic operation over ciphertexts may be equal to the encryption of a new message computed between two original messages. In terms of commutative encryption, it stands for a repeated encryption system that Alice’s ciphertext can be duplicated encrypted using Bob’s public key. A dual-receiver ciphertext will appear after the commutative encryption. Following, based on the public key encryption, the second topic focuses on the public key encryption with equality test schemes, the basic and fundamental ciphertext computation. Briefly, the user-authorized testers are able to verify the equivalence between messages hidden in ciphertexts after they acquire trapdoors from ciphertext receivers; and the ciphertexts were never decrypted in the whole equality testing process. The scope and architecture of the authorization directly influence the application and security for equality test schemes. Three authorizations including “cipher-bound authorization”, “compatible authorization” and “semantic secure authorization” will be proposed. The third topic is keyword search. It works in the following scenario: a user outsources encrypted files and encrypted keywords on a cloud file storage system; then, when needed, the user is able to request a search query to the file server, which is corresponding to some encrypted keywords. Although files and keywords are encrypted, the server is still able to verify the match-up and return related files to the user. Two researches about keyword search are proposed: the subset multi-keyword search based on public key encryption, and the password-authenticated keyword search.
Reference:	[1] in the Cloud IT, “How Can Cloud Computing Benefit Businesses?,” in the Cloud IT. [Online]. Available: https://www.inthecloudit.co.uk/blog/cloud-solutions-business/. [2] R. F. Churchhouse, Codes and ciphers: Julius Caesar, the Enigma, and the Internet. Cambridge University Press, 2002. [3] D. Luciano and G. Prichett, “Cryptology: From Caesar ciphers to public-key cryptosystems,” Coll. Math. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2–17, 1987. [4] Learn Cryptography, “Caesar Cipher.” [Online]. Available: https://learncryptography.com/classical-encryption/caesar-cipher. [5] Crypto Museum, “Enigma D.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cryptomuseum.com/crypto/enigma/d/index.htm. [6] D. DiSalvo, “How Alan Turing Helped Win WWII And Was Thanked With Criminal Prosecution For Being Gay,” 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddisalvo/2012/05/27/how-alan-turing-helped-win-wwii-and-was-thanked-with-criminal-prosecution-for-being-gay/#65cdff725cc3. [7] S. L. Garfinkel, PGP - pretty good privacy: encryption for everyone (2. ed.). O’Reilly, 1995. [8] J. Daemen and V. Rijmen, The design of Rijndael: AES-the advanced encryption standard. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. [9] R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. M. Adleman, “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems (Reprint),” Commun. ACM, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 96–99, 1983. [10] T. El Gamal, “A public key cryptosystem and a signature scheme based on discrete logarithms,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 469–472, 1985. [11] R. Cramer and V. Shoup, “A Practical Public Key Cryptosystem Provably Secure Against Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack,” in CRYPTO’98, 1998, vol. 1462, pp. 13–25. [12] R. Cramer and V. Shoup, “Design and Analysis of Practical Public-Key Encryption Schemes Secure against Adaptive Chosen Ciphertext Attack,” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 167–226, 2003. [13] P. Paillier and D. Pointcheval, “Efficient Public-Key Cryptosystems Provably Secure Against Active Adversaries,” in ASIACRYPT ’99, 1999, vol. 1716, pp. 165–179. [14] P. Paillier, “Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes,” in EUROCRYPT’99, 1999, vol. 1592, pp. 223–238. [15] R. Canetti, S. Halevi, J. Katz, Y. Lindell, and P. D. MacKenzie, “Universally Composable Password-Based Key Exchange,” in EUROCRYPT’05, 2005, vol. 3494, pp. 404–421. [16] R. Kikuchi, K. Chida, D. Ikarashi, and K. Hamada, “Practical Password-Based Authentication Protocol for Secret Sharing Based Multiparty Computation,” in CANS’15, 2015, vol. 9476, pp. 179–196. [17] F. Kiefer and M. Manulis, “Oblivious PAKE: Efficient Handling of Password Trials,” in ISC’15, 2015, vol. 9290, pp. 191–208. [18] F. Kiefer and M. Manulis, “Blind Password Registration for Verifier-based PAKE,” in AsiaCCS’16, 2016, pp. 39–48. [19] M. Abdalla, P.-A. Fouque, and D. Pointcheval, “Password-Based Authenticated Key Exchange in the Three-Party Setting,” in PKC’05, 2005, vol. 3386, pp. 65–84. [20] A. C.-C. Yao, “Protocols for Secure Computations (Extended Abstract),” in 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 1982, pp. 160–164. [21] M. Agrawal, “Primality Tests Based on Fermat’s Little Theorem,” in Distributed Computing and Networking, 8th International Conference, ICDCN 2006, 2006, vol. 4308, pp. 288–293. [22] K. Sakurai and H. Shizuya, “Relationships Among the Computational Powers of Breaking Discrete Log Cryptosystems,” in EUROCRYPT’95, 1995, vol. 921, pp. 341–355. [23] P.-A. Fouque, A. Joux, and C. Mavromati, “Multi-user Collisions: Applications to Discrete Logarithm, Even-Mansour and PRINCE,” in ASIACRYPT’14, 2014, pp. 420–438. [24] W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman, “New directions in cryptography,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 644–654, 1976. [25] D. Boneh and M. K. Franklin, “Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil Pairing,” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 586–615, 2003. [26] S. Chatterjee and A. Menezes, “On cryptographic protocols employing asymmetric pairings - The role of Ψ revisited,” Discret. Appl. Math., vol. 159, no. 13, pp. 1311–1322, 2011. [27] S. D. Galbraith, K. G. Paterson, and N. P. Smart, “Pairings for cryptographers,” Discret. Appl. Math., vol. 156, no. 16, pp. 3113–3121, 2008. [28] J. Dittmann, A. Lang, M. Steinebach, and S. Katzenbeisser, “ECRYPT’05,” in Sicherheit 2005, 2005, vol. 62, pp. 189–192. [29] G. Ateniese, K. Fu, M. Green, and S. Hohenberger, “Improved proxy re-encryption schemes with applications to secure distributed storage,” {ACM} Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2006. [30] M. Naor and M. Yung, “Universal One-Way Hash Functions and their Cryptographic Applications,” in 21st Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1989, pp. 33–43. [31] F. Kiefer and M. Manulis, “Distributed Smooth Projective Hashing and Its Application to Two-Server Password Authenticated Key Exchange,” in ACNS’14, 2014, vol. 8479, pp. 199–216. [32] Y. C. Chen and G. Horng, “Timestamped conjunctive keyword-searchable public key encryption,” in Innovative Computing, Information and Control, ICICIC’09, 2009, pp. 729–732. [33] A. Narayanan, J. Bonneau, E. W. Felten, A. Miller, and S. Goldfeder, Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies - A Comprehensive Introduction. Princeton University Press, 2016. [34] S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.” 2008. [35] C. B. Marc Stevens, Elie Bursztein, Pierre Karpman, Ange Albertini, Yarik Markov, Alex Petit Bianco, “Announcing the first SHA1 collision,” Google security blog, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html. [Accessed: 23-Feb-2017]. [36] M. Bellare and P. Rogaway, “Random Oracles are Practical: A Paradigm for Designing Efficient Protocols,” in CCS’93, 1993, pp. 62–73. [37] R. Canetti, O. Goldreich, and S. Halevi, “The random oracle methodology, revisited,” J. {ACM}, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 557–594, 2004. [38] M. Bellare, A. Desai, D. Pointcheval, and P. Rogaway, “Relations Among Notions of Security for Public-Key Encryption Schemes,” in CRYPTO’98, 1998, vol. 1462, pp. 26–45. [39] E. Fujisaki and T. Okamoto, “How to Enhance the Security of Public-Key Encryption at Minimum Cost,” in PKC ’99, 1999, vol. 1560, pp. 53–68. [40] A. Shamir, “How to Share a Secret,” Commun. ACM, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 612–613, 1979. [41] R. Cramer, I. Damgård, and J. B. Nielsen, Secure Multiparty Computation and Secret Sharing. Cambridge University Press, 2015. [42] R. Cramer et al., “On Codes, Matroids, and Secure Multiparty Computation From Linear Secret-Sharing Schemes,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 2644–2657, 2008. [43] I. Damgård and J. B. Nielsen, “Perfect Hiding and Perfect Binding Universally Composable Commitment Schemes with Constant Expansion Factor,” in CRYPTO’02, 2002, vol. 2442, pp. 581–596. [44] T. P. Pedersen, “Non-Interactive and Information-Theoretic Secure Verifiable Secret Sharing,” in CRYPTO’91, 1991, vol. 576, pp. 129–140. [45] C. Percival, “Stronger key derivation via sequential memory-hard functions,” Self-published, pp. 1–16, 2009. [46] H. Krawczyk, “Cryptographic Extraction and Key Derivation: The HKDF Scheme,” in CRYPTO’10, 2010, vol. 6223, pp. 631–648. [47] M. Luby and C. Rackoff, “How to Construct Pseudorandom Permutations from Pseudorandom Functions,” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 373–386, 1988. [48] J. Håstad, R. Impagliazzo, L. A. Levin, and M. Luby, “A Pseudorandom Generator from any One-way Function,” SIAM J. Comput., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1364–1396, 1999. [49] M. Bellare, R. Canetti, and H. Krawczyk, “Keying Hash Functions for Message Authentication,” in CRYPTO’96, 1996, vol. 1109, pp. 1–15. [50] S. Goldwasser and S. Micali, “Probabilistic Encryption,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 270–299, 1984. [51] M. Abdalla, F. Benhamouda, and D. Pointcheval, “Public-Key Encryption Indistinguishable Under Plaintext-Checkable Attacks,” in PKC’15, 2015, vol. 9020, pp. 332–352. [52] ACM, “A.M. Turing Award Winners by Year.” 2016. [53] E. Fujisaki, T. Okamoto, D. Pointcheval, and J. Stern, “RSA-OAEP Is Secure under the RSA Assumption,” in CRYPTO’01, 2001, vol. 2139, pp. 260–274. [54] M. Bellare and P. Rogaway, “Optimal Asymmetric Encryption,” in EUROCRYPT’94, 1994, vol. 950, pp. 92–111. [55] E. Bresson, D. Catalano, and D. Pointcheval, “A Simple Public-Key Cryptosystem with a Double Trapdoor Decryption Mechanism and Its Applications,” in Advances in Cryptology - {ASIACRYPT} 2003, 9th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Taipei, Taiwan, November 30 - December 4, 2003, Proceedings, 2003, vol. 2894, pp. 37–54. [56] J. Hoffstein, J. Pipher, J. H. Silverman, and J. H. Silverman, An introduction to mathematical cryptography, vol. 1. Springer, 2008. [57] M. Bellare and A. Palacio, “Towards Plaintext-Aware Public-Key Encryption Without Random Oracles,” in ASIACRYPT’04, 2004, vol. 3329, pp. 48–62. [58] J. Domingo-Ferrer, “A Provably Secure Additive and Multiplicative Privacy Homomorphism,” in ISC’02, 2002, vol. 2433, pp. 471–483. [59] K. Peng, C. Boyd, E. Dawson, and B. Lee, “Ciphertext Comparison, a New Solution to the Millionaire Problem,” in ICICS’05, 2005, vol. 3783, pp. 84–96. [60] R. Lu, “Homomorphic Public Key Encryption Techniques,” in Privacy-Enhancing Aggregation Techniques for Smart Grid Communications, Springer, 2016, pp. 13–40. [61] R. Cramer, I. Damgård, and J. B. Nielsen, “Multiparty Computation from Threshold Homomorphic Encryption,” in EUROCRYPT’01, 2001, vol. 2045, pp. 280–299. [62] D. Boneh, E.-J. Goh, and K. Nissim, “Evaluating 2-DNF Formulas on Ciphertexts,” in TCC’05, 2005, vol. 3378, pp. 325–341. [63] C. Gentry, “Computing on Encrypted Data,” in CANS’09, 2009, vol. 5888, p. 477. [64] C. Gentry, S. Halevi, and N. P. Smart, “Fully Homomorphic Encryption with Polylog Overhead,” in EUROCRYPT’12, 2012, vol. 7237, pp. 465–482. [65] C. Gentry, “Fully homomorphic encryption using ideal lattices,” in STOC’09, 2009, pp. 169–178. [66] M. van Dijk, C. Gentry, S. Halevi, and V. Vaikuntanathan, “Fully Homomorphic Encryption over the Integers,” in EUROCRYPT’10, 2010, vol. 6110, pp. 24–43. [67] J. C. Benaloh and M. de Mare, “One-Way Accumulators: A Decentralized Alternative to Digital Sinatures (Extended Abstract),” in EUROCRYPT’93, 1993, vol. 765, pp. 274–285. [68] J. Kelsey, B. Schneier, and D. A. Wagner, “Key-Schedule Cryptanalysis of IDEA, G-DES, GOST, SAFER, and Triple-DES,” in CRYPTO’96, 1996, vol. 1109, pp. 237–251. [69] K. Huang and R. Tso, “A commutative encryption scheme based on ElGamal encryption,” in 3rd International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control, ISIC’12, 2012. [70] K. Huang, R. Tso, and Y.-C. Chen, “One-time-commutative public key encryption,” in Computing conference 2017, 2017. [71] T. Diament, H. K. Lee, A. D. Keromytis, and M. Yung, “The dual receiver cryptosystem and its applications,” in 11th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, 2004, pp. 330–343. [72] Y. Lu, R. Zhang, and D. Lin, “Stronger Security Model for Public-Key Encryption with Equality Test,” in Pairing 2012, 2012, vol. 7708, pp. 65–82. [73] S. Ma, “Identity-based encryption with outsourced equality test in cloud computing,” Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 328, pp. 389–402, 2016. [74] T. Wu, S. Ma, Y. Mu, and S. Zeng, “ID-Based Encryption with Equality Test Against Insider Attack,” in ACISP’17, 2017, vol. 10342, pp. 168–183. [75] G. Yang, C. H. Tan, Q. Huang, and D. S. Wong, “Probabilistic Public Key Encryption with Equality Test,” in CT-RSA’10, 2010, pp. 119–131. [76] Q. Tang, “Public key encryption supporting plaintext equality test and user-specified authorization,” Secur. Commun. Networks, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1351–1362, 2012. [77] Q. Tang, “Public key encryption schemes supporting equality test with authorisation of different granularity,” IJACT, no. 4, pp. 304–321. [78] S. Ma, M. Zhang, Q. Huang, and B. Yang, “Public Key Encryption with Delegated Equality Test in a Multi-User Setting,” Comput. J., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 986–1002, 2015. [79] K. Huang, R. Tso, Y.-C. Chen, W.-Y. Li, and H.-M. Sun, A new public key encryption with equality test, vol. 8792. 2014. [80] S. Canard, G. Fuchsbauer, A. Gouget, and F. Laguillaumie, “Plaintext-Checkable Encryption,” in CT-RSA’12, 2012, vol. 7178, pp. 332–348. [81] K. Huang, R. Tso, Y.-C. Chen, S. M. M. Rahman, A. Almogren, and A. Alamri, “PKE-AET: Public Key Encryption with Authorized Equality Test,” Comput. J., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2686–2697, 2015. [82] V. Shoup, “Sequences of games: a tool for taming complexity in security proofs,” IACR Cryptol. ePrint Arch., vol. 2004, p. 332, 2004. [83] D. Boneh, G. Di Crescenzo, R. Ostrovsky, and G. Persiano, “Public Key Encryption with Keyword Search,” in EUROCRYPT’04, 2004, pp. 506–522. [84] F. Buccafurri, G. Lax, R. A. Sahu, and V. Saraswat, “Practical and Secure Integrated PKE+PEKS with Keyword Privacy,” in SECRYPT’15, 2015, pp. 448–453. [85] D. Boneh and B. Waters, “Conjunctive, Subset, and Range Queries on Encrypted Data,” in TCC’07, 2007, pp. 535–554. [86] E.-K. Ryu and T. Takagi, “Efficient Conjunctive Keyword-Searchable Encryption,” in Advanced Information Networking and Applications AINA’07, 2007, pp. 409–414. [87] D. J. Park, K. Kim, and P. J. Lee, “Public Key Encryption with Conjunctive Field Keyword Search,” in Information Security Applications, 5th International Workshop, {WISA}’04, 2004, pp. 73–86. [88] L. Ballard, S. Kamara, and F. Monrose, “Achieving Efficient Conjunctive Keyword Searches over Encrypted Data,” in ICICS’05, 2005, vol. 3783, pp. 414–426. [89] P. Golle, J. Staddon, and B. R. Waters, “Secure Conjunctive Keyword Search over Encrypted Data,” in ACNS’04, 2004, pp. 31–45. [90] Y. Zhang and S. Lu, “{POSTER:} Efficient Method for Disjunctive and Conjunctive Keyword Search over Encrypted Data,” in Proceedings of the 2014 {ACM} {SIGSAC} Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2014, pp. 1535–1537. [91] B. Zhang and F. Zhang, “An efficient public key encryption with conjunctive-subset keywords search,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 262–267, 2011. [92] K. Huang, Y.-C. Chen, and R. Tso, “Semantic secure public key encryption with filtered equality test PKE-FET,” in SECRYPT’15, 2015. [93] K. Huang, R. Tso, and Y.-C. Chen, “Somewhat Semantic Secure Public Key Encryption with Filtered-Equality-Test in the Standard Model and Its Extension to Searchable Encryption,” J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 2017. [94] K. Huang, M. Manulis, and L. Chen, “Password authenticated keyword search,” in IEEE PAC, 2017. [95] M. Abdalla et al., “Searchable Encryption Revisited: Consistency Properties, Relation to Anonymous IBE, and Extensions,” J. Cryptol., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 350–391, 2008. [96] X. Yi, F. Hao, L. Chen, and J. K. Liu, “Practical Threshold Password-Authenticated Secret Sharing Protocol,” in ESORICS’15, 2015, vol. 9326, pp. 347–365. [97] A. Bagherzandi, S. Jarecki, N. Saxena, and Y. Lu, “Password-protected secret sharing,” in CCS’11, 2011, pp. 433–444. [98] J. Camenisch, A. Lysyanskaya, and G. Neven, “Practical yet universally composable two-server password-authenticated secret sharing,” in CCS’12, pp. 525–536. [99] J. Camenisch, A. Lehmann, A. Lysyanskaya, and G. Neven, “Memento: How to Reconstruct Your Secrets from a Single Password in a Hostile Environment,” in CRYPTO’14, 2014, vol. 8617, pp. 256–275. [100] S. Jarecki, A. Kiayias, and H. Krawczyk, “Round-Optimal Password-Protected Secret Sharing and T-PAKE in the Password-Only Model,” in ASIACRYPT’14, 2014, vol. 8874, pp. 233–253. [101] J. Camenisch, R. R. Enderlein, and G. Neven, “Two-Server Password-Authenticated Secret Sharing UC-Secure Against Transient Corruptions,” in PKC’15, 2015, vol. 9020, pp. 283–307. [102] S. Jarecki, A. Kiayias, H. Krawczyk, and J. Xu, “Highly-Efficient and Composable Password-Protected Secret Sharing (Or: How to Protect Your Bitcoin Wallet Online),” in IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy, EuroS&P’16, 2016, pp. 276–291. [103] R. Curtmola, J. A. Garay, S. Kamara, and R. Ostrovsky, “Searchable symmetric encryption: improved definitions and efficient constructions,” in CCS’06, 2006, pp. 79–88. [104] C. Örencik, A. Selcuk, E. Savas, and M. Kantarcioglu, “Multi-Keyword search over encrypted data with scoring and search pattern obfuscation,” Int. J. Inf. Sec., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 251–269, 2016. [105] Y.-C. Chen, R. Tso, M. Mambo, K. Huang, and G. Horng, “Certificateless aggregate signature with efficient verification,” Secur. Commun. Networks, vol. 8, no. 13, 2015. [106] K. Huang and R. Tso, “New Convertible Ring Signature Based on RSA,” Inf. J., vol. 16, no. 9b, pp. 7163–7173, 2013.
Description:	博士國立政治大學資訊科學學系 100753504
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100753504
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Computer Science ] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
350401.pdf	3910Kb	Adobe PDF2	368	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback