English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51771227      Online Users : 578
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/115152


    Title: 市場競爭規範適用於廣播電視領域的理論基礎－德國法學界逾十載「卡特爾法」與「廣電法」論戰的啟示
    The Competition Law in the Regulation Field of Broadcasting Laws-The Continuous Debates in Germany
    Authors: 石世豪
    Shyr, Shyr-Hau
    Keywords: 文化財;市場;基本供給;競爭規範;權限劃分
    cultural property;market;grundrechte competence;the competition law
    Date: 1996-07
    Issue Date: 2017-12-15 12:08:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 廣電事業彼此間在市場上的競爭與合作關係，是否應該一體適用市場競爭法規（在我國則為公平交易法），德國法學界曾有過激烈的爭辯。兩大法域中的法學者除了各自標舉本身的法律思想、批評對方干擾市場運作（廣電管制）或侵蝕廣電憲章（市場化）之外，也分別從基本法上關於權力分立、基本權保障等觀點，嘗試提出劃分兩大法域界限，或甚至調和兩大法域的具體辦法。其中以功能的觀點，試圖提升基本權保障最適狀態的理論，最值得國內相關法制建構的參考。
    After the German `Lander` licensed the commercial broadcasters in their territories, the Federal Cartel Agency (Bundesk artellamt) gained consequently its competence over the new broadcasters and tried-which the experts of broadcasting laws strongly criticized-to constrain the established public broadcasters into the same competition model. Since the public broadcasters have obeyed for years rules according to the principle of coordination and integration, it`s no wonder that the expansions of these `market giants` were steadily warned and eventually forbidden. The experts of the (federal) competition law and those of the broadcasting laws (of the `Lander`) have developed several theories to resolve the competence disputes problem. Among them the functional approach of the optimal guarantee for `grundrechte` is especially interesting for readers in Taiwan. The formal approach, on the other hand, is based on the long standing tradition of German legal dogmatics. Therefore it should not be hastily adopted in another country without critical analysis of the cultural differences in between.
    Relation: 新聞學研究, 53, 161-189
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2353View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback