政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/114417
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 114401/145431 (79%)
造訪人次 : 53135281      線上人數 : 705
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114417


    題名: 零售市場投資產品之法律糾紛、訴訟風險及投資人保護——臺灣有關連動債及共同基金訴訟之實證研究
    Legal Risk and Investor Protection for Retail Investment Products: An Empirical Study of Lawsuits Regarding Mutual Funds and Structured Notes in Taiwan
    作者: 陳肇鴻
    Chen, Christopher Chao-Hung
    關鍵詞: 實證研究;法律風險;訴訟風險;投資糾紛;共同基金;連動債;信託;銀行;金融消費者保護法
    Empirical Study;Legal Risk;Investment Disputes;Retail Investment Products;Mutual Fund;Structured Note;Trust, Bank;Financial Consumer Protection
    日期: 2015-06
    上傳時間: 2017-11-07 10:43:34 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文共研究自二○○○年以後至二○一二年年底前，有關共同基金及連動債之訴訟共322件，並分析訴訟最終結果與投資人特質、主要爭點及法律主張間的關係，本文主要發現如下：首先，投資人之勝訴率不高，此代表銀行所面臨的法律責任風險相當低；其次，就連動債糾紛，向訴訟外紛爭解決機制尋求救濟未必較有利；其三，由於資訊有限，本文尚無法證明法院對具若干特質的投資人就較有利；其四，除主張契約未成立外，原告勝訴率未因主張不同爭點而有明顯差異，但規範上應就銀行銷售產品後之義務方面作進一步澄清；其五，本文未發現若原告舉出特定的請求權基礎或訴訟策略，和訴訟結果間有統計上顯著的關係，亦無證據證明引用多個法律依據即可增加投資人勝訴的機會。
    This study analyses the results of 322 lawsuits regarding retail mutual funds and structured notes in Taiwan between 2000 and 2012 and their relationship with other factors such as investors` personal characteristics, main arguments and causes of action. This study has the following major findings: (1) the winning rate for investors was quite low, meaning that banks face low legal risk from inappropriately selling claims; (2) investors were not better off for having filed a complaint with the Banker`s Association; (3) we have not proved that the courts showed preference for investors with certain personal traits due to the limited information available; (4) a plaintiff`s winning rate does not vary much from one argument to another, except for arguing formation of contract, but our research shows that more might have to be done to clarify the post-contractual responsibilities of banks; (5) there is also no proof to indicate that certain causes of action or litigation strategies would help investors in winning a judgment and we have not proved that filing more causes of action would help to increase a plaintiff’s chance of winning. Our findings urge regulators and legislators to reconsider regulatory policies for investor protection as well as dispute resolution for financial consumers in the future to offer more complete protection of financial consumers.
    關聯: 政大法學評論, 141, 109-196
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102398202015060141003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202015060141003
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    141-3.pdf2127KbAdobe PDF2323檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋