English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51622478      Online Users : 564
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/114243


    Title: 儒家為何要對存在問題有所交代？再論牟宗三的「道德的形上學」
    Why Confucianism Should Address the Issues of Existence? Further Discussion of Mou Zongsan`s Moral Metaphysics
    Authors: 吳啟超
    Ng, Kai-Chiu
    Keywords: 儒家;形上學;存在;牟宗三;道德的形上學
    Confucianism;Metaphysics;Existence;Mou Zongsan;Moral Metaphysics
    Date: 2016-07
    Issue Date: 2017-10-31 14:58:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 牟宗三曾表示儒家哲學不能局限在道德，而亦須對存在問題有所交代。本文所論即對此而發，探討儒家哲學有何理論需要去關涉事物的存在問題。文章分為兩大部分（第貳、參兩節），先從「原意」的角度，指出儒家（牟宗三眼中以《論語》、《孟子》、《中庸》、《易傳》為核心的儒家）本就有意對存在問題作交代。再從「理論」的角度指出：（1）（對儒家來說）道德實踐如非荒謬，必得承認道德關懷的對象為「不空」（非如幻如化）。（2）在牟氏的「道德的形上學」裏，對象之為「不空」由「仁心」的覺潤來保證。（3）這種「仁心」的創造作為「『妙萬物而為言』的運用的創造」、「成全事為一必然的實有而不只是一偶然的存在之創生」，實亦配得上「創造」之名。
    Mou Zongsan thinks that Confucianism should deal with not only moral philosophy, but should also the issues of existence. This paper therefore aims at examining his view - is it necessary for Confucianism to deal with the issues of existence? The paper is divided into two parts. Firstly, we examine the pre-Qin classics which were considered by Mou as the canons of Confuncianism. These include the Analects, Mencius, the Doctrine of the Mean and Yi Commentaries. We will see that these texts indeed address the issues of existence. Secondly, from the theoretical perspective, we argue that: (1) If moral practices are to be meaningful, they must depend on the existence of the objects they are concerned. (2) In Mou’s moral metaphysics, this existence is guaranteed by the moral mind’s intention. (3) Although this notion of ＂moral creation＂ by the moral mind is different from God’s creation, it still deserves the name of ＂creation＂.
    Relation: The National Chengchi University Philosophical Journal
    政治大學哲學學報, 36, 33-67
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    36-2.pdf1272KbAdobe PDF2406View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback