English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51719552      Online Users : 618
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/113038


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/113038


    Title: Formative measurement test of supplier evaluation indicators and weight models
    Authors: 洪敘峰
    Chen, Suduan
    Hung, Hsu Feng
    Contributors: 企管系
    Keywords: Cost accounting;Costs;Decision support systems;Supply chain management;Decision supports;Formative measurements;Management accounting;Procurement management;Supplier Evaluations;Quality control
    Date: 2016-05
    Issue Date: 2017-09-15 15:19:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Supplier evaluation is very important for supply chain management, procurement management, cost accounting, and management accounting. The most critical step involved in constructing a supplier evaluation model is selecting supplier evaluation indicators and analyzing the corresponding weights. However, an effect will occur where supplier ratings moderate the correlation between supplier evaluation indicators and supplier performance. This study surveys 104 supplier evaluation specialists and collects evaluation data from 1028 suppliers. Statistical data analysis shows that, in the absence of supplier ratings, the supplier evaluation indicator can be considered as a reflective scale that represents supplier performance. If a supplier rating is in place, then the correlations between supplier evaluation indicators are significantly weakened, and supplier evaluation indicators are recognized as a formative scale. The study also finds, through an examination of six different weight models, that the importance of supplier evaluation indicators is ordered as: quality, price, delivery performance, customer service, and flexibility. The aforementioned research findings make a meaningful contribution to the literature on supply chain management and also serve as insightful references for business practices in supplier evaluation.
    Relation: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44(3), 1350-1363
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1520/JTE20140426
    DOI: 10.1520/JTE20140426
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2476View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback