English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51706638      Online Users : 540
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111805


    Title: 網路使用對人際互動的影響-不同文化環境的比較研究
    The influence of internet use on interpersonal interaction-a comparative study of different cultural environments
    Authors: 吳佩儒
    Wu, Pei-Ju
    Contributors: 李仲彬
    朱斌妤

    Lee, Chung-Pin
    Chu, Pin-Yu

    吳佩儒
    Wu, Pei-Ju
    Keywords: 人際互動
    國家文化
    網路使用行為
    Interpersonal interaction
    National culture
    Internet using behaviors
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 10:03:43 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   隨著資訊與通訊科技的快速發展與廣泛應用,網際網路日益普及,使得民眾在日常生活中諸多事務越來越依靠網路,進而帶來數位化的生活模式及互動型態,近年來,社群網站、即時通訊軟體等社交平台的大量出現,使得許多民眾開始利用網路來拓展其人際關係與管理其友誼網絡。此外,過去在探討網路使用與人際互動的文獻中,鮮少針對網路使用者所處的國家文化與環境背景加以分析,然而,人類所從事的行為會受到其生存的環境脈絡與文化價值觀所影響。以此為前提,本研究的主要目的在於檢視網路使用對人際互動的影響,以及探討不同文化環境下的民眾對於起網路使用行為有何差異。
      本研究經由文獻檢閱,整理出網路使用行為與友誼網絡發展的相關文獻,以及國家文化的相關概念與構面,包括文化差異與人際關係的關聯性、國家文化與網路使用行為的關係等理論。本研究的分析方法為次級資料分析,資料蒐集自世界網路計畫之社會調查,分析中國與美國當前網路發展與使用行為的現況與趨勢,接著利用階層邏輯迴歸分析,比較不同國家文化環境下,民眾網路使用與人際互動之關聯性。
      整體結果顯示,網路使用動機可以分為工具性、社交性及娛樂性三種類型,其中社交性網路使用動機對於人際互動具有正向顯著相關,意即網路使用與社交網絡的興起,提供民眾更多進行互動的平台與管道,增強了人際互動的聯繫;此外,在國家文化的影響因素下,根據分析結果,發現當國家文化屬於東方文化時,其社交性網路使動機為對於人際互動會產生較強烈的影響,換言之,國家文化作為調節變相對於網路使用行為與人際互動間確實會產生不一樣的效應。
     With the rapid development of information and communication technology, people are getting more and more rely on the Internet in daily life, which contribute to the digital lifestyle and interactive patterns. In recent years, large numbers of Online Socializing Platform, such as community sites, instant messenger, etcare making people begin to use the Internet to expand their relationships and manage their friendship network. In the past, the literatures on the use of Internet and interpersonal interaction were rarely analyzed for the national culture and environmental background of Internet users. However, the behavior of human beings will be affected by the context and cultural values that they live on. In this premise, the main objective of this study is to examine the impact of Internet use on interpersonal interaction and to explore the differences in behavior between people from different cultural environment.
     The study, with literature review, has sorted out the internet using behaviors and friendship network development of the relevant literature, as well as the relevant concepts of national culture and aspect, including the relationship between cultural differences and interpersonal relationships, the relationship between national culture and internet using behaviors. The method of this study is secondary data analysis, data were collected from the survey of World Internet Project. Class-based logistic regression analysis was then proceeded to to discuss correlation between internet using behaviors and interpersonal interaction with the comparison of cultures from different countries.
     Overall results show that Internet use motivation can be divided into three types, including instrumental motivation, social motivation and entertaining motivation. While social motivation has significant positive correlation on interpersonal interaction, it means the use of the network and the rise of social networks provide people with more interactive platform and pipeline, and enhance the interpersonal interaction. Based on the analytical results, when the national culture belongs to the oriental culture, social motivation will have a stronger impact on interpersonal interaction under the influence of national culture. In other words, national culture as a moderator variable has different effects on internet using behaviors and interpersonal interaction.
    Reference: 中文部分
    王嵩音(2007)。網路使用之態度、動機與影響。資訊社會研究,12,57-85。
    王熙哲、丁耀民(2008)。人際關係網路對虛擬社群使用意願的影響。資訊管理學報,15(1),53-72。
    丘昌泰(2008)族群、文化與認同:連鎖關係的再檢視。國家與社會,5,1-35。
    古雲秀、朱浩榜、吳安哲、吳翊鳳、吳嘉玲、李厚穎、莊易縉、許韋婷、張道宜、陳方隅(2005)。圖解簡明世界局勢。台北:易博士文化。
    朱美慧(2000)。我國大專學生個人特性、網路使用行為與網路成癮關係之研究。大業大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
    朱國明(2007)。網路社群社會資本與成員間助人行為之相關研究。資訊管理學報,14(2),169-202。
    行政院國發會(2015)。104年個人/家戶數位落差調查報告。台北:行政院國發會。
    吳亞馨、朱素玥、方文昌(2008)。網路購物信任與科技接受模式之實證研究。資訊管理學報,15(1),123-152。
    吳宛穎(2006)。說故事建立品牌:國家文化、產品品類、品牌屬性之探討。國立政治大學國際經營與貿易研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    吳齊殷、戴昀(2004)。虛擬空間的倫理議題─網路社會的社會秩序與信任。社會的公共倫理、公民德行與公民養成研討會,台北。
    李仲彬(2011)。「信任」在電子治理中所扮演的角色:以文獻檢閱為基礎的初探性分析。公共行政學報,39,105-147。
    李仲彬、陳俊明、黃東益(2012)。網路社會發展趨勢之前瞻研究:世界網路計畫 (WIP) 的跨國比較與臺灣現況調查分析。行政院國發會委託研究報告。臺北市:行政院國家發展委員會。
    居延安(譯)(1988)。超越文化(原作者:Edward T. Hall)。上海:上海文化。(原著出版年:1976)
    林以正、王澄華、吳佳煇(2005)。網路人際互動特質與依戀型態對網路成癮的影響。中華心理學刊,47(3),289-309。
    林孟萱(2005)。性別差異及生活型態對線上遊戲使用者消費行為之影響研究。國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    林珊如(2002)。網路使用者特性與資訊行為研究趨勢之探討。Information Studies,17,35-47。
    林頌堅(2008)。以網站流量資料探討使用者的網路使用行為。圖書資訊學研究,2(2),39~60。
    孫采薇(2010)族群差異、族群歧視與族群衝突-全球與亞太趨勢的比較。臺灣東南亞學刊,7(1),123-149。
    翁睿廷(2002)。跨文化因素與人力資源管理策略相關性研究-以台商在大陸地區子公司為例。義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    張志學(1999)。中國人的人際關係認知:一項多維度的研究。本土心理學研究,12,261-288。
    張卿卿(2006)網路的功與過:網路使用與政治參與及社會資產關係的探討。新聞學研究,86,45-90。
    張純富(2010)。社交網站人際關係維繫之研究:以Facebook為例。世新大學資訊傳播學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    張偉瑤(2011)。個人化行動社群感知網路連結技術。電腦與通訊,137,81-88。
    張萬烽(2011)。次級分析在特殊教育研究上的意義與應用。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,2011,105-125。
    連征忠(2002)。虛擬社群成員間信任關係之探討。大業大學事業經營研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化。
    陳俊明、朱斌妤、黃東益、蔣麗君、李仲彬、張鎧如(2014)。數位國家治理:國情分析架構與方法。行政院國發會委託研究報告。臺北市:行政院國家發展委員會。
    陳冠夫(2006)。跨國企業海外子公司管理之探討-以台商在越南為例。國立政治大學國際經營與貿易研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    陳軼辰(2003)。線上遊戲參與行為─消費者性別角色認同之探討。長庚大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,桃園。
    陳碧祥、李珮瑜(2008)。網際空間人我互動之探究:以情感及信任層面為例。網際網路技術學刊,9(2),161-165。
    陳嬿竹(2002)。網路與真實人際關係、人格特質及幸福感之相關研究。國立屏東師範學院教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東。
    陶振超(2015)。網際網路與友誼網絡:取代、擴大、或強化。傳播與社會學刊,34,62。
    彭泗清、鄭也夫(2003)。關係與信任:中國人人際信任的一項本土研究。北京:中國城市出版社。
    曾釔棖(2008)。東西方線上社群跨文化研究——以網路遊戲《魔獸世界》中「公會」為例。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    曾淑芬(2009)。網際網路的信任與風險:經驗科技或是社會濡染。資訊社會研究,17,127-151。
    辜美安、呂明錡、蔡宗益、賴金英(2014)。醫療人員如何應用次級資料分析。台灣醫學,18(4),471-479。
    黃光國(2003)。中國人的權力遊戲。台北:巨流。
    黃厚銘(2001)。真實的謊言:虛擬社區中的身份認同與信任。第四屆資訊科技與社會轉型研討會,台北。
    黃英忠、曾榮豐、楊晴安(2009)。人際關係、信任、規範與知識分享關係之研究-社會資本觀點。高雄大學亞太工商管理學系會議論文集,高雄。
    黃聲雄(譯)(1993)。無聲的語言(原作者:Edward T. Hall)。台北:巨流。(原著出版年:1959)
    楊宜音(1995)。試析人際關係及其分類。社會學研究,5,18-23。
    楊政穎、鍾才元、陳明終、李曜安(2014)。社群網路使用者之線上社會支持與線上人際關係。國教新知,61(4),22-27。
    葉蓉慧(2013)。從《無聲的語言》與《超越文化》談Edward T. Hall 在跨文化溝通灑下的種子。傳播研究與實踐,3(1),233-245。
    董旭英、黃儀娟(2000)。次級資料研究法。新北:弘智文化。
    資策會(2015)。2014年我國家庭寬頻現況與需求調查-個人篇。2015年07月14日,取自:http://www.find.org.tw/market_info.aspx?n_ID=8466
    熊瑞梅.(2014)。社會資本與信任:東亞社會資本調查的反思。臺灣社會學刊,54,1-30。
    翟本瑞(2000)。電腦媒介溝通對傳統人際關係影響。網路社會學通訊期刊,10,223-243。
    劉家儀(2001)。以人際關係論與計畫行為論探討網路交友之現象。國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。
    戴怡君、董旭英(2002)。使用網際網路進行互動者特質之探討。資訊社會研究,2,29-58。
    謝宗學(2003)。網際民主與審議民主之實踐:資訊化社會的桃花源村。資訊社會研究,4,87-139。
    鍾韶庭(2007)。台灣、德國品牌個性、廣告訴求與消費者價值信念之跨文化比較。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    韓佩凌(2000)。台灣中學生網路使用者特質、網路使用行為、心理特性對網路沈迷現象之影響。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文碩士論文,未出版,台北。
    魏鏡倫(2002)。文化與信任影響網路購物意圖之研究。國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文,未出版,桃園。 

    英文部分
    Baack, D. W., & Singh, N. (2007). Culture and web communications. Journal of Business Research, 60(3), 181-188.
    Beaudoin, C. E. (2008). Explaining the relationship between internet use and interpersonal trust: Taking into account motivation and information overload. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(3), 550-568.
    Berry, D. S., & Hansen, J. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(4), 796.
    Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. Pew Internet and American life project. Retrieved May 20, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Internet_ties.pdf
    Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the Internet. The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships, 709-723.
    Bochner, S. (1994). Cross-Cultural Differences in the self concept a test of Hofstede`s individualism/collectivism distinction. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 25(2), 273-283.
    Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1): John Wiley & Sons.
    Chang, K., & Ding, C. G. (1995). The influence of culture on industrial buying selection criteria in Taiwan and Mainland China. Industrial Marketing Management, 24(4), 277-284.
    Chaulk, K., & Jones, T. (2011). Online obsessive relational intrusion: Further concerns about Facebook. Journal of Family Violence, 26(4), 245-254.
    Copeland, L., & Griggs, L. (1985), Going International: How to make friends and deal effectively in the global marketplace. New York: Random House.
    Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103-108.
    Cyr, D., Hassanein, K., Head, M., & Ivanov, A. (2007). The role of social presence in establishing loyalty in e-service environments. Interacting with computers, 19(1), 43-56.
    DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E., Neuman, W. R., & Robinson, J. P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual review of sociology, 27, 307-336.
    Doney, P. M., Cannon, J. P., & Mullen, M. R. (1998). Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 601-620.
    Dutton, W. H., & Shepherd, A. (2004). Confidence and risk on the Internet. Cyber Trust and Crime Prevention Project. Oxford:Oxford Internet Institute.
    Ellison, N., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). Te benefits of Facebook “friends”: Exploring the relationship between college students’ use of online social networks and social capital. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 1143-1168.
    Ess, C., & Sudweeks, F. (2005). Culture and Computer‐Mediated Communication: Toward New Understandings. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11(1), 179-191.
    Fernandez, D. R., Carlson, D. S., Stepina, L. P., & Nicholson, J. D. (1997). Hofstede`s country classification 25 years later. The Journal of social psychology, 137(1), 43-54.
    Fougère, M., & Moulettes, A. (2007). The construction of the modern West and the backward rest: Studying the discourse of Hofstede`s Culture`s Consequences. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(1), 1-19.
    Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
    Hampton, K., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Retrieved July 12, 2011 from http://cn.cnstudiodev.com/uploads/document_attachment/attachment/46/pew_-_social_networking_sites_and_our_lives.pdf.
    Hills, M. D. (2002). Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck`s values orientation theory. Online readings in psychology and culture, 4(4), 3.
    Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15-41.
    Hofstede, G. (1980b). Cultures Consequences: Individual differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    Hofstede, G. (1983). National cultures in four dimensions: A research-based theory of cultural differences among nations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 13(1-2), 46-74.
    Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization studies, 19(3), 477-493.
    Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede`s culture dimensions an independent validation using Rokeach`s value survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 15(4), 417-433.
    Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research, 38(1), 52-88.
    Katz, J. E., & Aspden, P. (1997). A nation of strangers? Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81-86.
    Kluckhohn, F. R., & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1961). Variations in value orientations.
    Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American psychologist, 53(9), 1017.
    Kuchinke, K. P. (1999). Leadership and culture: Work‐related values and leadership styles among one company`s US and German telecommunication employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10(2), 135-154.
    Lustig, M. W. (1988). Value differences in intercultural communication. Intercultural communication: a reader. Belmont, California: Wadsworth.
    Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., Doff, S., Reeder, I. C. K., Chase, M., & Roche, E. J. (2004). Communicating across cultures in cyberspace: A bibliographical review of online intercultural communication. Hamburg: Lit-Verlag.
    Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review, 98(2), 224.
    Minkov, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010). Hofstede`s fifth dimension: New evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 43(1), 3-14.
    Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet reconciling conflicting findings. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
    Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment: Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.
    Pavlou, P. A., & Chai, L. (2002). What Drives Electronic Commerce across Cultures? Across-Cultural Empirical Investigation of the Theory of Planned Behavior. J. Electron. Commerce Res., 3(4), 240-253.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P., & Ang, C. S. (2006). Cultural differences in collaborative authoring of Wikipedia. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(1), 88-113.
    Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman. Publishing Co., Inc.
    Rogers, E. M., Hart, W. B., & Miike, Y. (2002). Edward T. Hall and the history of intercultural communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review, 24(3), 3-26.
    Shklovski, I., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2006). The Internet and social interaction. Computers, phones, and the Internet, 251-264.
    Singh, N., & Baack, D. W. (2004). Web Site Adaptation: A cross‐cultural comparison of US and Mexican web sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 9(4). Retrieved July, 2004, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/singh_baack.html
    Singh, N., & Matsuo, H. (2004). Measuring cultural adaptation on the Web: a content analytic study of US and Japanese Web sites. Journal of Business Research, 57(8), 864-872.
    Soliman, K. S., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Guinalíu, M. (2008). Fundaments of trust management in the development of virtual communities. Management Research News, 31(5), 324-338.
    Srite, M. (2006). Culture as an explanation of technology acceptance differences: An empirical investigation of Chinese and US users. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 14(1).
    Urista, M. A., Dong, Q., & Day, K. D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Communication, 12(2), 215-229.
    V. Shah, N. K., R. Lance Holbert, Dhavan. (2001). " Connecting" and" disconnecting" with civic life: Patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Political communication, 18(2), 141-162.
    Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction a relational perspective. Communication research, 19(1), 52-90.
    Wang, G., & Huang, Y.-H. C. (2016). Contextuality, Commensurability, and Comparability in Comparative Research Learning From Chinese Relationship Research. Cross-Cultural Research, 50(2), 154-177.
    Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American behavioral scientist, 45(3), 436-455.
    Wicks, A. C., Berman, S. L., & Jones, T. M. (1999). The structure of optimal trust: Moral and strategic implications. Academy of management review, 24(1), 99-116.
    WIP (2012). World Internet Project- International Report (3rd edition).Retrieved March 25, 2012, from http://www.worldinternetproject.net
    WIP (2012). World Internet Project- International Report (4th edition).Retrieved December 19, 2012, from http://www.worldinternetproject.net
    WIP (2013). World Internet Project- International Report (5th edition).Retrieved December 20, 2013, from http://www.worldinternetproject.net
    Yang, S.-s., & Zhang, Y.-x. (2010). The Research of the Differences Between Chinese and Western Diet Cultures/UNE RECHERCHE SUR LES DIFFÉRENCES ENTRE LES CULTURES ALIMENTAIRES CHINOISE ET OCCIDENTALE. Cross-Cultural Communication, 6(2), 75.
    Yoon, C. (2009). The effects of national culture values on consumer acceptance of e-commerce: Online shoppers in China. Information & Management, 46(5), 294-301.
    Zakour, A. B. (2004). Cultural differences and information technology acceptance. In Proceedings of the 7th annual conference of the Southern association for information systems, 156-161.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    公共行政學系
    103256032
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103256032
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    603201.pdf1761KbAdobe PDF2487View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback