政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111803
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51788366      Online Users : 486
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111803


    Title: 社會信任與發展援助成效之關聯
    Social trust and the impact of development aid
    Authors: 蔡婷茹
    Tsai, Ting Ju
    Contributors: 蘇昱璇
    Su, Yu Hsuan
    蔡婷茹
    Tsai, Ting Ju
    Keywords: 現金補助
    實物補助
    社會信任
    Cash transfers
    In-Kind transfers
    Social trust
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-08-10 10:02:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 現金補助與實物補助是對於發展中國家最普遍的援助方法,基於「信任」在國家經濟發展扮演之重要角色,本文使用世界銀行2008年至2010年於迦納進行之「迦納微型企業的成長和捕蠅紙效果之隨機實驗」計畫所收集之數據,在Fafchamps et al.(2014)的基礎上,納入信任關係方面的問卷答覆作為關鍵變數,透過最小平方法OLS,並以宗教多數、家庭規模作為工具變數進行兩階段最小平方法2SLS處理內生性問題,探討信任關係對於迦納微型企業的利潤之影響,並進一步分析當納入「信任」之影響後,迦納微型企業接受現金補助與實物補助之利潤差異。從以上多種迴歸分析之研究結果發現,加入信任關係後,基本上,接受實物補助的微型企業主仍然相較現金補助組與控制組有顯著較多的利潤,而現金補助對於利潤之效果較小甚至無顯著性,唯一例外是在進行普通最小平方法時,控制所有類型的信任之影響,發現現金補助對於利潤具有正面且顯著的效果,且利潤之效果(每月能增加15.599 GhC)相較原Fafchamps et al.(2014)利潤(每月能增加14.503 GhC)之效果大,縮小與實物補助之利潤之差異,因此本文推估「信任」與接受補助之利潤效果是有關連的。
    Cash transfers and in-kind transfers are the most common methods of aid in developing countries. Because “trust” plays an important role in economic development, this research utilizes data collected from World Bank’s randomized experiment in Ghana: 2008-2010 “Microenterprise Growth and the Flypaper Effect”. This paper builds on the foundation of Fafchamps et al. (2014) and considers trust-related variables. I use the OLS method to explore the impact of trust relationships on Microenterprise’s profits in Ghana and the differences between firms receiving cash transfers and in-kind transfers. The two-stage least squares (2SLS) method using religious majority and household size as instrument variables is also implemented to avoid endogeneity issues. The findings show that after we consider the trust relationships, microenterprise owners who received in-kind transfers received statistically significant higher profits than the cash transfers group and the control group, and the treatment effects of the cash transfers become smaller or even insignificant. The only exception is that in OLS regression when all types of trust variables are controlled, the cash treatment has a positive and statistically significant effect on profits (will increase 15.599 GhC per month). This result is larger than the result in Fafchamps et al. (2014) (increase by 14.503 GhC per month), and the difference between cash and in-kind shrinks. Therefore, this paper considered that “trust” is related to the profit effects of receiving transfers.
    Reference: 任勝鋼、高欣、趙天宇 (2016),中國創業的人脈資源究竟重要嗎? ——網絡跨度與信任的交互效應研究。科學學與科學技術管理, 37, 146-154。
    李宛蓉(譯)(2014),信任:社會德性與繁榮的創造(Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity,原作者:Fukuyama, Francis)。臺北市:立緒。(原著出版年:1995)。
    張維迎與柯榮住 (2002),信任及其解釋:來自中國的跨省調查分析。經濟研究,10,59–70。
    Adler, P. S. (2001). Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism. Organization Science, 12(2), 215–234.
    Agyeman-duah, B. (2008). Curbing Corruption and Improving Economic Governance : The Case of Ghana. Accra: Ghana Centre for Democratic Development, 1–8.
    Akresh, R., de Walque, D., and Kazianga, H. (2016). Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation of the Household Welfare Impacts of Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers Given to Mothers or Fathers. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (7730).
    Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 42–58.
    Arrow, K. J. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 343-362.
    Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.
    Ashraf, N., Bohnet, I., and Piankov, N. (2006). Decomposing trust and trustworthiness. Experimental Economics, 9(3), 193–208.
    Asian Development Bank (1997). Microenterprise Development: Not by Credit Alone. Asian Development Bank, Pakistan.
    Attanasio, O., Battistin, E., Fitzsimons, E., Mesnard, A., and Vera-hernández, M. (2005). How effective are conditional cash transfers? Evidence from Colombia. The Institute for Fiscal Studies, 54, 1–9.
    Bartlett, M. S. (1951). A further note on tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 4(1), 1-2.
    Ben-Ner, A., and Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79.
    Berggren, N., & Bjørnskov, C. (2009). Does religiosity promote or discourage social trust? Evidence from cross-country and cross-state comparisons.
    Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., and McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122–142.
    Bianco, W.T. (1994). Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    Blattman, C., Fiala, N., and Martinez, S. (2013). Credit constraints, occupational choice, and the process of development: long run evidence from cash transfers in Uganda. SSRN Scholarly Paper.
    Blattman, C., Green, E. P., Jamison, J., Lehmann, M. C., & Annan, J. (2016). The Returns to Microenterprise Support among the Ultrapoor: A Field Experiment in Postwar Uganda. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(2), 35-64.
    Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., & Baker, R. M. (1995). Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and the endogenous explanatory variable is weak. Journal of the American statistical association, 90(430), 443-450.
    Bourguignon, F., Ferreira, F. H. G., and Leite, P. G. (2002). Ex-ante Evaluation of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: The Case of Bolsa Escola. William Davidson Institute Working Paper., (516).
    Brehm, J., and Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.
    Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2), 245-276.
    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. The American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
    Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University press.
    Cox, J. C. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46(2), 260–281.
    De Mel, S., McKenzie, D. J., and Woodruff, C. (2008). Returns to Capital in Microenterprises. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1329–1372.
    De Mel, S., McKenzie, D. J., and Woodruff, C. (2009). Measuring microenterprise profits: Must we ask how the sausage is made? Journal of Development Economics, 88(1), 19–31.
    De Mel, S., McKenzie, D. J., and Woodruff, C. (2012). One-Time Transfers of Cash or Capital Have Long-Lasting Effects on Microenterprises in Sri Lanka. Science, 335(6071), 962–966.
    Del Ninno, C., and Dorosh, P. (2003). Impacts of in-kind transfers on household food consumption: Evidence from targeted food programmes in Bangladesh. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(1), 48–78.
    Ermisch, J., and Gambetta, D. (2010). Do strong family ties inhibit trust?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75(3), 365-376.
    Fafchamps, M., Mckenzie, D., Quinn, S., and Woodruff, C. (2014). Microenterprise growth and the flypaper effect: Evidence from a randomized experiment in Ghana. Journal of Development Economics, 106, 211–226.
    Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital , civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.
    Gamson, W. A. (1968). Power and Discontent. Homewood, The Dorsey Press.
    Geertz, C. (1962). The rotating credit association: A" middle rung" in development. Economic development and cultural change, 10(3), 241-263.
    Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2008). Trusting the Stock Market. The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2557–2600.
    Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., and Smith, V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 49-66.
    Haushofer, J., and Shapiro, J. (2013). Household Response to Income Changes: Evidence from an Unconditional Cash Transfer Program in Kenya. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1–57.
    Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
    Hines, J. R., and Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies The Flypaper Effect. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 217–226.
    Hoynes, H. W., and Schanzenbach, D. (2009). Consumption Responses to In-Kind Transfers: Evidence from the Introduction of the Food Stamp Program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 109–139.
    Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W.H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of financial economics, 3(4), 305–360.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
    Karlan, D. S. (2005). Using experimental economics to measure social capital and predict financial decisions. The American Economic Review, 95, 1688–1699.
    Knack, S., and Keefer, P. (1997). Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff ? A Cross-Country Investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
    La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silane, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997). Trust in Large Organizations. American Economic Review, 87, 333–338.
    Levi, M., Sacks, A., and Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing Legitimacy, Measuring Legitimating Beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 354–375.
    Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. John Willey and Sons.
    Macneil, I. R. (1980). The new social contract: An inquiry into modern contractual relations. Yale University Press.
    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and Cognition-Based Trust As Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59.
    Miller, A. S., and Mitamura, T. (2003). Are Surveys on Trust Trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(1), 62–70.
    Morgan, R. M., and Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.
    Muller, E. N., and Jukam, T. O. (1977). On the Meaning of Political Support. American Political Science Review, 71(4), 1561–1595.
    Naef, M., & Schupp, J. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination.
    Nichols, A. L., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (1982). Targeting transfers through restrictions on recipients. The American Economic Review, 72(2), 372–377.
    Piza C, Cravo T, Taylor L, Gonzalez L, Musse I, Furtado I, Sierra AC, Abdelnour S. (2016). The Impacts of Business Support Services for Small and Medium Enterprises on Firm Performance in Low-and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 12(1).
    Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton:Princeton University Press.
    Putnam, R. D. (1995) Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664–683.
    Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
    Rawlings, L. B., and Rubio, G. M. (2005). Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Research Observer, 20(1), 29–55.
    Scholz, J. T., and Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2), 398–417.
    Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of George Simmel. New York: Free Press.
    Simmel, G. (1990). The philosophy of money. London: Routledge.
    Simmons, E. (2004). The role of microenterprise assistance in U.S. development policy. Economic Perspectives, 9(1).
    Skoufias, E., Unar, M., and Gonzalez de Cossio, T. (2013). The poverty impacts of cash and in-kind transfers: Experimental evidence from rural Mexico. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 5(4), 401–429.
    Soares, F. V., Ribas, R. P., and Osório, R. G. (2010). Evaluating the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review, 45(2), 173–190.
    Spearman, C. (1904). " General Intelligence," Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201-292
    Staiger, D. O., & Stock, J. H. (1994). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments.
    Whitfield, L. (2009). Change for a Better Ghana’: Party Competition, Institutionalization and Alternation in Ghana’s 2008 Elections. African Affairs, 108(433), 621–641.
    Zak, P. J., and Knack, S. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111(470), 295–321.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國家發展研究所
    104261016
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104261016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Graduate Institute of Development Studies] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101601.pdf1384KbAdobe PDF247View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback