政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111557

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111557

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113822/144841 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51781415 線上人數 : 591

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS) > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/111557

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111557

題名:	遲來正義不是正義？台韓轉型正義方法的比較 Justice delayed or justice denied? a comparison of transitional justice approaches in Taiwan and South Korea
作者:	歐嘉仁 Olivier, Jeremy
貢獻者:	魏玫娟 Wei, Mei-Chuan 歐嘉仁 Jeremy Olivier
關鍵詞:	台灣南韓轉型正義民主化真相委員會 Taiwan South Korea Transitional justice Democratization Truth commission
日期:	2017
上傳時間:	2017-07-31 11:25:19 (UTC+8)
摘要:	由於台灣與南韓近期的政權與溝通的更迭，兩國國內的政治焦點又再次轉向正義，尤其是針對在獨裁政權統治下，受到迫害的人民而言的歷史正義。雖然台灣與南韓在二十世紀時，都經歷了相似的政治進程，但兩國在處理政治轉型前的人權迫害問題，即所謂的轉型正義的方法卻不盡相同。在南韓，轉型後的政府開始推行一系列的政策，包括成立真相委員會、審判兩名前任總統、為國家暴力的受害者建立多重補償法案。相對的，台灣政府的作法則較為零碎，使用相對消極的方法尋找真相、提供戒嚴時期的受害者賠償、目前則處理長久以來具有爭議性的國民黨黨產問題。本論文將檢視此兩個東亞「第三波」民主國家，在處理轉型正義的問題上（亦即尋求真相與責任歸屬）為何會採用兩種徹底不同的解決之道，並對不同解決方式背後的環境、歷史、制度下的原因提出疑問；接著探討南韓政府這看似合理的做法為何僅是紙上談兵，究竟有何欠缺。針對兩國的轉型正義議題，本論文試著提出一項溫和的轉型正義推動政策，以滿足受害者對於真相、對於平復的渴望，以促進兩國內部對立團體的和解。
參考文獻:	Baik, T.U. (2012). Fairness in transitional justice narratives: the case of South Korea. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 19, pp. 169-191. Baron, J. (2015, July). Book review: Turning devils into men. Taipei Times. Retrieved at http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2015/07/09/2003622592/2 Chang, Y.H. (2009). Qianyan. In Chang, Y.H. & Chen, M.J. (Eds.), Jieyan shiqi baise kongbu yu zhuanxing zhengyi lunwenji (pp. 2-13). Taipei City, Taiwan: Wu Sanlien Foundation. Chao, L. & Myers, R.L. (2000). How elections promoted democracy in Taiwan under martial law. The China Quarterly, Special Issue: Elections and Democracy in Greater China 162, pp. 387-409. Chiu, H. (1993). Constitutional development and reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan (with documents). Occasional Papers/Reprint Series in Contemporary Asian Studies, No. 2(115), pp. 1-61. Chiu, Y.L. (2017, March). DPP to push transitional justice act. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/04/04/2003668039 Cheng, T.J. (1989). Democratizing the quasi-Leninist regime in Taiwan. World Politics, 41(4), pp. 471-499. Cho, K. (2007). Transitional justice in Korea: legally coping with past wrongs after democratization. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 16(3), pp. 579-610. Choi, J. (2017, April). The victim cosplay of a former dictator. Korea Exposé. Retrieved from https://koreaexpose.com/south-korea-former-dictator-victim-cosplay/ Cole, J.M. (2015, July). Taiwanese students occupy ministry over textbook controversy. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/taiwanesestudents-occupy-education-ministry-over-textbook-controversy/ The Constitution of the Republic of China and the Additional Articles, English Version. Retrieved from http://www.ey.gov.tw/pda_en/Upload/WebArchive/4697/Constitution.pdf Dancy, G., Marchesi, B., Olsen T., Payne, L., Reiter, A., & Sikkink, K. (2013, August). Stopping state agents of violence or promoting political compromise? The powerful role of transitional justice mechanisms. Paper presented at the 2013 American Political Science Association Conference Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL. De Greiff, P. (2012). Theorizing transitional justice. In Williams, M.S., Nagy, R., & Elster, J. (Eds.), Transitional Justice (pp. 31-77). New York, NY: New York University Press. Denney, S. (2015, August). Taiwan’s collective memory of Japan: Around the horn. Sino-NK. Retrieved from http://sinonk.com/2015/08/31/collective-memory-ofjapan-in-taiwan/ Dickson, B.J. (1993). The lessons of defeat: the reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950-1952. The China Quarterly, No, 133, pp. 56-84. Executive Yuan. (2016, August). Press Releases: Executive Yuan launches committee to settle ill-gotten party assets. Retrieved from http://english.ey.gov.tw/News_Content2.aspx?n=8262ED7A25916ABF&sms=D D07AA2ECD4290A6&s=ECFDB4C0B28C2559 Gerber, A. (2017, June). Aboriginal protest site on Ketagalan Blvd cleared. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2017/06/03/2003671820 Gibson, J.L. (2004). Does truth lead to reconciliation? Testing the causal assumptions of the South African truth and reconciliation process. American Journal of Political Science, 48(2), pp. 201-217. Greitens, S.C. (2016). Dictators and their secret police: coercive institutions and state violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Han, I.S. (2005). Kwangju and beyond: coping with past state atrocities in South Korea. Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 998-1045. Hanley, P. (2014). Transitional justice in South Korea: One country’s search for truth and reconciliation. University of Pennsylvania East Asia Law Review, Vol. 9, pp. 138-166. Hayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable truths: transitional justice and the challenge of truth commissions (second edition). New York, NY: Routledge. Huntingdon, S. P. (1991). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press. Hwang, J.Y. (2016). Transitional justice in postwar Taiwan. In Schubert, G. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Modern Taiwan (pp. 169-183). New York, NY: Routledge. Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee. (2016). Zuzhi jieshao. Retrieved from http://www.cipas.gov.tw/organize.action Jacobs, J.B. (2005). “Taiwanization” in Taiwan politics. In Makeham, J. & Hsiau, A.C. (Eds.), Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan: Bentuhua (pp. 17-55). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Jacobs, J.B. (2007). Taiwan and South Korea: comparing East Asia’s two “third wave” democracies. Issues and Studies, 43(4), pp. 227-260. Jacobs, J.B. (2012). Democratizing Taiwan. Boston, MA: Brill Publishers. Judicial Yuan Interpretation No. 272 (January 1991). Retrieved from http://www.judicial.gov.tw/constitutionalcourt/EN/p03_01.asp?expno=272 Jung, K.S. (2015). Hanguo de minzhuhua, zhuanxing zhengyi yu guoqu qingsuan. Bulletin of Taiwan Historical Research NTNU, No. 8, pp. 3-26. Kim, D.C. (2012). Korea’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: An overview and assessment. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 19(2), pp. 1-25. Kim, H.J. (2013). What is transitional justice and why is it relevant to South Korea? SSK Human Rights Brief, 1(4), pp. 28-34. Kim, H.J. (2013, December). Truth Commissions in South Korea: Lessons Learned. Middle East Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.mei.edu/content/truthcommissions-south-korea-lessons-learned Kim, J.C. (2016). On forgiveness and reconciliation: Korean “collaborators” of Japanese colonialism. In Kim, M. (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia (pp. 159-171). New York, NY: Routledge. Kim, H.M., Choi, J.Y., and Cho, J. (2006, July). Changing cleavage structure in new democratic Korea: an empirical analysis of regionalism in Korea. Paper presented at the World Congress of the International Political Science Association, Fukuoka, Japan. Kim, S. (1997). State and civil society in South Korea’s democratic consolidation: is the battle really over? Asian Survey, 37(12), pp. 1135-1144. Kim, T.J. (2007, August). State to confiscate land of pro-Japanese collaborators. The Korea Times. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20070927191442/http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/ news/nation/nation_view.asp?newsIdx=8259&categoryCode=117 Ko, S.L. (2002, September). Cabinet hails passing of political party law bills. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2002/09/12/0000167725 Kritz, N.J. (1996). Accountability for international crimes and serious violations of human rights: coming to terms with atrocities: a review of accountability mechanisms for mass violations of human rights. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59(4), pp. 127-152. Kushner, B. (2015). Men to devils, devils to men: Japanese war crimes and Chinese justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Lai, T.H. (1994). Ererba shijian yanjiu baogao (Research Report on the 2-28 Incident). Taipei, Taiwan: Shibao Chubanshe. Lee, J. (2002). Primary causes of Asian democratization: dispelling conventional myths. Asian Survey, 42(6), pp. 821-837. Lee, Y. (2005). Law, politics, and impeachment: the impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a comparative perspective. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 53(2), pp. 403-432. Li, F.C. (2008). Weiquan tizhi xia de guomindang dangying qiye. Guoshiguan Xueshu Jikan, No. 18, pp. 189-220. Lin, C.L. (2007). Transition without justice: on challenges of KMT’s party asset for consolidating democracy in Taiwan. Paper presented at the International Conference on the Comparative Studies of Transitional Justice, Taipei Taiwan. Matsumoto, M. (2002). Political democratization and KMT party-owned enterprises in Taiwan. The Developing Economies, XL-3, pp. 359-380. Memorial Foundation of 228. (2006). Research report on responsibility for the 228 Massacre: a brief introduction. Retrieved from http://www.228.org.tw/ResponsibilityReport/eng/ Mendeloff, D. (2004). Truth-seeking, truth-telling, and postconflict: curb the enthusiasm? International Studies Review, 6(3), pp. 355-380. Mendez, J. E. (1997). Accountability for past abuses. Human Rights Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 255-282 Mosler, H.B. (2015). The deterioration of South Korean democracy. In Howe, B. (Ed.), Democratic governance in Northeast Asia: A human-centered approach to evaluating democracy (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. National Security Act, English Version. Retrieved from http://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=A0030028 Olsen, T. D., Payne, L.A., & Reiter, A.G. (2010). The justice balance: when transitional justice improves human rights and democracy. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(4), pp. 980-1007. Orentlicher, D. Settling accounts: the duty to prosecute human rights violations of a prior regime. The Yale Law Journal, 100(8), pp. 2537-2615. Pan, J. & Hsiao, A. (2016, November). Court rules against KMT account freeze. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2016/11/05/2003658598 Payne, L.A., Olsen, T.D., & Reiter, A.G. (2008, March). Does transitional justice work? Paper presented at the 49th International Studies Association Convention, San Francisco, CA. Peté, S. & du Plessis, M. (2007). Reparations for gross violations of human rights in context. In du Plessis, M & Peté, S. (Eds.), Repairing the past? International perspective on reparations for gross human rights abuses (pp. 3-28). Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia. Philpott, D. (2012). Just and unjust peace: an ethic of political reconciliation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Rhee, W.Y. (2016, December). The role of the constitution and the constitutional adjudication in the process of democratization and the implementation of transitional justice in the Republic of Korea. Paper presented at Constitutionalizing Transitional Justice: International Symposium on Post-Atrocity Constitution-making and Constitutional Courts, Taipei, Taiwan. Robinson, M.E. (2007). Korea’s twentieth century odyssey: a short history. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press. Roehrig, T. (2001). The prosecution of former military leaders in newly democratic nations: the cases of Argentina, Greece, and South Korea. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company. Roy, D. (2003). Taiwan: a political history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Schafferer, C. (2010). Consolidation of democracy and historical legacies: a case study of Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 9(1), pp. 23-41. Shih, C.F. & Chen, M. (2010). Taiwanese identity and the memories of 2-28: A case for political reconciliation. Asian Perspective, 34(4), pp. 85-113. Shih, F.L. (2014). Transition to democracy at the expense of justice: the 2-28 Incident and the White Terror in Taiwan. Middle East Institute, March 4, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.mei.edu/content/transition-democracy-expense-justice-2-28-incident-and-white-terror-taiwan Shih, H.C. (2006). DPP to submit petition for referendum on KMT assets. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2006/08/23/2003324449 Slater, D. & Wong, J. (2013). The Strength to concede: ruling parties and democratization in development Asia. Perspectives on Politics, 11(3), pp. 717-733 Snyder, J. & Vinjamuri, L. (2003). Trials and errors: principle and pragmatism in strategies of international justice. International Security, 28(3), pp. 5-44. Su, S.X. Ping Hou Kunhong “Yanjiu ererba.” Taiwan Historica Bulletin, No. 38, p. 119-126. Taiwan chengwei zhenzheng minzhu guojia de zuihou yi li lu. (2016, March). Business Today. Retrieved from http://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article-content-80392- 台灣成爲真正民主國家最後的一哩路 Teitel, R. (2000). Transitional Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Teitel, R. (2003). Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 13(69), pp. 69-94. Tien, H.M. (1992). Transformation of an authoritarian party state: Taiwan’s development experience. In Cheng, T.J. & Haggard, S. (Eds.), Political change in Taiwan (pp. 33-55). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Republic of Korea (2009). Truth and Reconciliation: Activities of the Past Three Years (TRCK Report, English Translation). Retrieved from: http://www.dhnet.org.br/verdade/mundo/coreia/cv_11_coreia_do_sul.pdf Wachman, A. (1994). Taiwan: national identity and democratization. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. Wang, F. (1994). The political economy of authoritarian clientelism in Taiwan. In Roniger, L. & Gunes-Ayata, A. (Eds.) Democracy, clientelism, and civil society (pp. 181-206). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers. Waters, D.M. (1996). Korean constitutionalism and the “Special Act” to prosecute former presidents Chun Doo-hwan and Roh Tae-woo. Columbia Journal of Asian Law, 10(2), pp. 461-488. West, J.M. (1997). Martial lawlessness: the legal aftermath of Kwangju. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal, 6(1), pp. 85-168. West, J.M. & Yoon, D.K. (1992). The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex? The American Journal of Comparative Law, 40(1), pp. 73-119. Wolman, A. Looking back while moving forward: the evolution of truth commissions in Korea. Asia-Pacific Law and Policy Journal, 14(3), pp. 27-56. WuDunn, S. (1995, December). Ex-president of South Korea goes on trial on bribery charges. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1995/12/18/world/ex-president-of-south-korea-goes-ontrial-on-bribery-charges.html Wu, N.T. (2005). Transition without justice, or justice without history: transitional justice in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 1(1), pp.77-102. Yang, C.H. (2016, July). Ill-gotten Assets Act: Reporter’s Notebook: Assets mission completed after long haul. Taipei Times. Retrieved from http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/taiwan/archives/2016/07/27/2003651888 Yeh, H. (2017). Cong guoqu de zhiniu diyin dao jinri de zhu xuanlu – guanyu Taiwan zhuanxing zhengyi lunshu de zexie. 21st Century Magazine, No. 159, pp. 24-38. Zhu, L.X. (2016, May). Cong hanguo de “guoqu qingsuan” dao Taiwan de zhuanxing zhengyi. Rick Chu’s Perspectives on Korea and Media. Retrieved from http://www.rickchu.net/detail.php?rc_id=1708&rc_stid=1
描述:	碩士國立政治大學亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) 104926030
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104926030
資料類型:	thesis
顯示於類別:	[亞太研究英語博/碩士學位學程(IDAS/IMAS)] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
603001.pdf	1351Kb	Adobe PDF2	436	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋