政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/111297
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51763789      Online Users : 509
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/111297


    Title: 從懲戒角度看會計師事務所總分所之審計品質—基於中國大陸上市公司的實證分析
    On the Association between Audit Headquarter Office and the Sanction Likelihood: Evidence from China
    Authors: 官梅
    Guan, Mei
    Contributors: 金成隆
    Jin, Cheng Long
    官梅
    Guan, Mei
    Keywords: 懲戒
    審計品質
    總分所
    Sanction
    Audit quality
    Headquarter office
    Date: 2017
    Issue Date: 2017-07-24 11:58:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 摘要
    本文之目的即從懲戒角度探索會計師事務所總、分所之審計品質差異。本文採用 2010~2015年中國大陸上市公司數據,通過實證迴歸得出了以下結論:從中國大陸本土“八大”、“十二大”來看,本文發現總所之會計師審計品質更高,被監管機關懲戒之可能性更低,這與本文之預期相符。同時,研究發現“十二大”會計師事務所總所之會計師在懲戒後改善效果比分所好。
    Abstract
    The objective of this thesis is to examine whether audit quality, measured as the auditor sanction likelihood, differs across auditors from headquarter office and those from other branch offices.
    Using a sample of listed firm in China during 2010 and 2015, my paper provides the following empirical findings. First, focusing on Big 8 or Big 12, I find that auditor from headquarter office have greater audit quality and, thus, are less likely to be sanctioned by regulatory agency or professional body, consistent with my hypothesis. Meanwhile, analyses reveal that auditors from headquarter office improve auditor quality more than those from branch office in the post-sanction period for a sub sample of firm-years audited by Big 12.
    Reference: 參考文獻
    方軍雄,2009,註冊會計師聲譽損害的代價[J],商業經濟與管理,第8期:89-96。
    方軍雄,洪劍峭,李若山,2004,我國上市公司審計品質影響因素研究:發現和啟示[J],審計研究,第6期:36-43。
    王兵,李晶,蘇文兵,唐逸凡, 2011,行政處罰能改進審計品質嗎?——基於中國證監會處罰的證據[J],會計研究, 第12期: 86-92。
    王曉珂,王豔豔,於李勝,趙玉萍,張震宇,2016,審計師個人經驗與審計品質,會計研究,第9期:75-81。
    朱紅軍,夏立軍,陳信元,2004,轉型經濟中審計市場的需求特徵研究,審計研究,第5期:53-62。
    米莉,薛高亮,2013,會計師事務所分所審計、行業監管與審計品質,註冊會計師,第9期:88-94。
    汪寧,廖建波,2007,劉爾奎等會計師事務所總分所設立與管理的實踐模式,,中國註冊會計師,第5期:36-41。
    汪寧,廖建波,劉爾奎,曾曉紅,楊濤,2007,會計師事務所總分所管理相關問題研究[J],中國註冊會計師,第8期:50-53。
    金成隆,陳美惠,曾小青,2015,資本市場會計研究——理論框架與實證證據,大連:東北財經大學出版社。
    徐永新,鄭杲娉,2011,資本市場監管效果初探:來自中國證監會審計處罰的經驗證據,中國會計學會2011學術年會論文集。
    張兆國,劉曉霞,邢道勇,2009,公司治理結構與盈餘管理—來自中國上市公司的經驗證據,中國軟科學,第1期:122-133。
    張奇峰,雷光勇,,2006,註冊會計師審計質量的經濟學分析[J],中南財經政法大學學報,第4期:61-67。
    郭道揚,吳聯生,2003,論註冊會計師審計品質保持機制——兼論我國註冊會計師審計品質保持機制的改進,審計研究,第5期:3-9。
    陳波,夏玲,2012,經濟依賴、聲譽效應與審計品質-W會計師事務所分所為分析單位的實證研究.審計與經濟研究,第5期:40-49。
    馮延超,梁萊歆,2010,上市公司法律風險、審計收費及非標準審計意見———市場大陸上市公司的經驗數據[J],審計研究,第3期:45-54。
    漆江娜,陳慧霖,張陽,2004,事務所規模·品牌·價格和審計品質——國際“四大”中國審計市場收費與品質研究[J],審計研究,第3期:59-65。
    劉玉廷,劉光忠,王宏,2010,中國註冊會計師行業改革與發展——解讀《關於加快發展我國註冊會計師行業的若干意見》,人民出版社。
    劉峰,周福源. 2007. 國際四大意味著高質量審計嗎?——基於會計穩健性角度的檢驗[J].會計研究(3):70-86。
    劉運國,麥劍青,魏哲妍,2006,審計費用與盈餘管理實證分析——來自中國證券市場的證據[J]. 審計研究,第2期:74-80。
    劉翰,2010,淺析我國會計師事務所分所組織模式與管理方法,商業會計,第10期(5月):37-38。
    劉靜,2010,政府監管與審計品質 ——基於中國證監會行政處罰的經驗證據,暨南大學碩士學位論文。
    Antle, R., and B. Nalebuff. 1991. Conservatism and auditor-client negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Supplement):31-54.
    Asthana, S. C., and J. P. Boone. 2012. Abnormal audit fee and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31(3): 1-22.
    Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 1-37.
    Becker, C. L., DeFond, M.L., Jiambalvo, J., and Subramanyam, K.R. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (1): 1-24.
    Cahan, S. F., and J. Sun. 2015. The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting :Auditing & Finance 30 (1): 78–100.
    Chan, K.H.,and D. H. Wu. 2011. Aggregate quasi rents and auditor independence:Evidence from audit Firm mergers in China. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (1): 175-213.
    Chaney, P. K., Jeter, D., and Shivakumar, L. 2004. Self-Selection of Auditors and Audit Pricing in private firms[J]. The accounting review 79 (1):57-72.
    Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing restatements with increased Industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 26 (3):729-765.
    Choi , J. 2010. Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing.Auditing:A Journal of Practice & Theory 29 (1):73~97.
    Clarkson,P. M.,and D. A. Simunic. 1994.The association between audit quality,retained ownership and firm-specific Risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (5):207~228.
    Newman,D. Paul., Evelyn R. Patterson., and J. Reed. Smith . 2005. The Role of Auditing in Investor Protection. The Accounting Review 80 (1): 289-313.
    Davis, L., and D. T. Simon. 1992. The impact of SEC disciplinary actions on audit fees [J]. A Journal of Practice &Theory 11(1):58-68.
    De Angelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor independence ‘low balling’ ,and disclosure regulation.Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2):113-127.
    De Angelo, L. E. 1981b.Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3):183~199.
    De Fond, M. L., and J. Zhang. 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 58 (2): 275-326.
    De Fond, M. L., and J. R. Francis. 2005. Audit research after SOX. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24(supplement): 5-30.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
    DeFond, M.L., and J. Jiambalvo, 1991. Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors. The Accounting Review 66 (3) :643-655.
    Dopuch, Nicholas, and Dan. A. Simunic. 1982. “Competition in Auditing: An Assessment.” In Fourth Symposium on Auditing Research :41- 50.
    Dye, R. 1993. “Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth”.Journal of Political Economy 10 :887-914.
    Eckel, C., and P. Grossman. 2002. Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior 23 (4):281-29.
    Fan, D. C, and T. J. Wang. 2005. The analysis on the status quo and existing problem of logistic park in our country. Logistics SCI Tech (28): 1-4.
    Fellner, G., and B. Maciejovsky. 2007. Risk attitude and market behavior: Evidence from experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Psychology 28: 338-350.
    Firth, M. Mo. P. ,and R. Wong. 2005. Incentives for auditor independence; An analysis of the effectiveness of formal sanctions in China. Working paper, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    Firth, M., L. L. M. Phyllis., and R. M. K. Wong. 2004. Incentives for auditor independence: an analysis of the effectiveness of formal sanctions in China. Working paper.
    Firth, M., 1990. Auditor reputation: the impact of critical reports issued by government inspectors. RAND Journal of Economics 21 (3): 374-387.
    Francis, J. R. 2004. What do we know about audit quality. The British Accounting Review 36(4):345-368.
    Francis, J. R., and J. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism.[J]Contemporary Accounting Research 16(1):35-42.
    Francis, J. 1984. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market .Journal of Accounting and Economics 6: 133-151.
    Francis, J. R., P. Michas, and M. Yu. 2012. Office Size of Big 4 Auditors and Client Restatements.Contemporary Accounting Research .
    Francis, J., and J. Krishnan. 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Ressearch16 (1): 135-65.
    Francis, J., and M. Yu. 2009. The effects of big four office size on audit quality. The Accounting Review 84 (5): 1521-1552.
    Francis, J.R.2011. A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory:30(5):125-152.
    Geiger, M. A., K. Raghunandan., and D. V. Rama. 2006. Auditor Decision - Making in Different Litigation Environments: The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act,Audit reports and Audit Firm Size. Journal of Accounting &Public Policy 25 ( 3) : 332-353.
    Gold, A., J. Hunton., and M. Gomaa. 2009. The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors’ judgments. Accounting Horizons 23 (1):1-18.
    Guedhami, O., J.A. Pittman, and W. Saffar. 2014. Auditor choice in politically connected firms.Journal of Accounting Research 52 (1): 107–162.
    Gul, F. A., D. Wu, and Z. Yang. 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review 88 (6): 1993-2023.
    Hardies, K., D. Breesch , and J. Branson. 2010. Are female auditors still women? Analyzing the sex differences affecting audit quality. Working paper.University of Antwerp.
    Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20:125-153.
    Heckman, J. J. 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 :153–161.
    Hilary, G., and C .Lennox. 2005. The credibility of self-regulation :Evidence from the accounting profession` s peer review program[J] .Journal of Accounting and Economics (1-3):211 -229.
    Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (2): 193-228.
    Khurana, I. K., and K.K.Raman. 2004. “Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries”, The Accounting Review 79: 473-495.
    Knechel, W. R., A. Vanstraelen., and M. Zerni. 2015. Does the identity of engagement Partners Matter? An Analysis of Audit Partner Reporting Decisions Contemporary Accounting Research 32(4) : 1443–1478.
    Kothari, S. P., A. J. Leone, and C. Wasley. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (1): 163-197.
    Lennox, C. S. 1999. Audit quality and auditor size: An evaluation of reputation and deep pockets hypotheses. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26: 779-805.
    Lennox, Clive, and Li, Bing. 2014.“Accounting misstatements following lawsuits against auditors.”Journal of Accounting and Economics (57):58-75.
    Lundeberg, M., P. Fox., and J. Punchochar. 1994. Highly confident, but wrong: Gender differences and similarities in confidence judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 114-121.
    Nelson, M., J.Elliott.,and R. Tarpley. 2002. Evidence from auditors about manager’s and auditor’s earnings management decisions.The Accounting Review (Supplement) :175-202.
    Nelson, J., Liu.Y., J. Fiez, and C. A. Perfetti. 2005. Learning toread Chinese as a second language recruits Chinese-specificvisual word form areas. Paper presented at the Society forthe Scientific Study of Reading Conference, Toronto, June.
    Palmrose, Z. 1988. An Analysis of Auditor Litigation and Andit Service Quality. The Accounting Review 64 (jan) :55-73.
    Simunic, D. A., and M. T. Stein. 1987. Product Differentiation in Auditing: Auditor Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues. The Canadian Certified General Accountants` Research Foundation Research Monograph Number 13. British Columbia, Canada: The Canadian Certified General Accountants` Research Foundation.
    Srinidhi, B., F. Gul, and J. Tsui. 2014. Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research 28 (12) :1610–1644.
    Sundgren, S., and C. A. Svanstrom. 2013. Audit office size,audit quality and audit pricing:Evidence from small and medium size enterprises . Accounting and Business research 43 (1):31-55
    Wallman ,1996. “The Future of Accounting and Financial Reporting, Part II: Reliabilityand auditor independence ,”[J] Accounting Horizons (10):76-97
    Wang ,Y., L. Yu., and Y. Zhao. 2015. The association between audit-partner quality and engagement quality: Evidence from financial report misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 34 (3): 81-111.
    Wang, Q., T. J. Wong, and L. Xia. 2008. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics 46 (1): 112-134.
    Watts, and Zimmerman. 1981. The market for independence and independent auditors.Working paper. University of Rochester Graduate School of Management.
    Weber, J., M. Willenborg., and J. Zhang. 2008. Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and Com ROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research 46: 941-972.
    Wilson, J., E. Thomas, and A. G. Richard. 1990. An examination of the importance of an auditor’s reputation. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 9(2): 43-59.
    Wong, Man. Kong., and Raymond. 2005. An Empirical Study of Audit Quality in China from the Perspectives of Regulators and the Accounting Profession. School of Accounting and Finance.Working paper. Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    104353044
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104353044
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback