政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110643

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/110643

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51820773 Online Users : 543

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of International Business > Theses > Item 140.119/110643

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110643

Title:	公司治理對企業使用避稅天堂的影響 The effect of corporate governance on the usage of tax havens
Authors:	葉申誼 Yeh, Shen Yi
Contributors:	蘇威傑 Su, Wei Jie 葉申誼 Yeh, Shen Yi
Keywords:	避稅天堂公司治理 Corporate governance Tax haven
Date:	2017
Issue Date:	2017-07-03 14:33:40 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	公司治理是否影響企業使用避稅天堂的程度？本論文想要探討到底是怎麼樣的公司治理情形會影響台灣上市公司到避稅天堂設立海外子公司。由於避稅天堂可以提供低稅率或甚至是免稅給予外國企業，且有著複雜且保密的交易活動讓政府不易察覺與監督，使得避稅天堂容易變成各國企業逃稅的秘密基地。在這樣的情形下，我認為專業經理人所經營的企業，通常擁有較佳的公司治理機制，因此會把企業帶向良好的發展方向，且有抑制企業進行非法或不道德等行為，所以專業經理人所經營的企業會較少使用避稅天堂；反觀大股東持股數愈多或是家族企業可能會為了自己利益，造成公司的治理機制變差，讓公司處在道德風險高的經營環境中，因此我推論這樣的公司使用避稅天堂的程度也會較高。本研究蒐集自公開資訊觀測站與台灣經濟新報(TEJ)資料庫，進行負二項回歸分析，實證結果顯示家族企業比非家族企業更容易在避稅天堂設立海外子公司；專業經理人治理企業比非專業經理人控制企業更不容易使用避稅天堂；大股東持股數愈多的企業會更容易在避稅天堂設立子公司。因此台灣政府更應該關注家族企業及大股東持股數多的企業，且家族企業可以多聘用專業經理人讓公司治理情形變更加完善。 Does corporate governance affect the usage of tax havens? Establishing offshore companies in tax haven is an ethically controversial business practice, enabling companies to evade tax or hide illegal activities. Because tax havens offer a favorable tax to its taxpayers and they maintain a system of financial secrecy, numerous companies choose tax haven as a way to reduce or avoid tax. The purpose of this study is to examine what kind of corporate governance will make companies be more likely to set offshore companies in tax havens. I argue that corporations with professional managers compared with other companies would have a better corporate governance. Generally, professional manager possess professional managing abilities that can inhibit companies from processing illegal or unethical practice, so it will take companies to a good direction. As a result, I argue that companies with professional managers are less likely to set affiliated companies in tax havens. Nevertheless, family corporation or the companies with controlling shareholders have a worse corporate governance. Since they might deprive public profits for private interests so that their corporate governance would become worse. Therefore, I argue family corporate and companies with large shareholders are more likely to establish offshore companies in tax haven. The evidences show that family corporations and companies with large shareholders are more likely to set up companies in tax haven; however, professional managers’ companies are less likely to set offshore affiliates in tax haven.
Reference:	Broomfield, M. (2016), “Panama Papers: the world`s top tax havens,” INDEPENDENT Bushra, F. K., Hakeem, H., Hassnain, R. and Noor, A.H. (2017), “The Role of Tax Havens in the Tax Revenue Development and Its Reflection on the Public Revenues of the Developing Countries: An Empirical Study in Iraq (2004-2014)” Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2): 289-300. Desai, M., and Dharmapala, D. (2006), “Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives,” Journal of Financial Economics, 79(1): 145-179. Dharmapala, D., and Hines, J. R. (2009), “Which countries become tax haven?” , Journal of Public Economics, 93: 1058–1068. Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. C. (1983), “Separation of ownership and control,” Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 301-325. Fukuyama, F (1995), Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press. Gabriel Z. (2013), La richesse cachée des nations. France: The Seuil. Guttorm, S. (2009), “Tax havens and development,” NOU Official Norwegian Reports, 19, 15-17. Manoj, S. (2016), “Taking a Look at Tax Havens,” Investopedia Monks, R. A. G. and Minow, N. (2011), Corporate Governance. United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (1999), “Corporate ownership around the world,” Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471-517. Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997), “A survey of Corporate Governance,” Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737-783. Sobel, P. J. (2007), Auditor’s Risk Management Guide: Integrating Auditing and ERM. Chicago: CCH. Wilson, R. (2009), “An examination of corporate tax shelter participants,” The Accounting Review, 84: 969-999. Xiang, B. and Zhang, G. (1996), “Large Shareholder Expropriation and Corporate Ownership Structure”, APEA/PACAP Finance conference and CFA annual meeting. Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A. (1989), “Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model,” Journal of Management, 15(2): 291-334. 陳惠貞 (2002)。OBU在國際租稅規劃之應用—以個案公司探討，國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程會計組未出版碩士論文。鍾喜梅 (2015)。家族企業專業經理人角色之績效意涵：臺灣經驗之初探。人文與社會科學簡訊，17(1)，25-33。許士軍及陳光中 (1989)。台灣家族企業發展與家族結構關係，行政院國家科學會專題研究。佟毅 (2014)。避稅天堂的起源發展與現狀。中國石油財會，4，16-19。司徒達賢 (2012)。家族與專業經理人共治的時代。今周刊，804。黃昭勇 (2013)。企業好大稅好低。天下雜誌，523，78-82。陳一姍、林昭儀 (2014)。台灣12大富豪運用海外租稅天堂。天下雜誌，540，73-79。蔡鴻青 (2015)。有效管理家族企業的利益衝突。哈佛商業評論。天下雜誌(2011)。43個避稅天堂，404。2017年2月19日。取自http://www.cw.com.tw/article/articleLogin.action?id=5002375。財經新報 (2016)。比「巴拿馬文件」更內幕的避稅天堂故事，有錢人海外金庫揭密。2017年3月17日。取自http://finance.technews.tw/2016/06/09/avoidance-secret/。經濟日報(2017)。台紙公司治理問題。2016年12月16日。取自https://udn.com/news/story/7338/2271156 中時電子報(2015)。正視鴻矽戀的公司治理問題。2017年1月19日。取自http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151017000393-260109 社團法人中華公司治理協會(2015)。什麼是公司治理，台北：中華治理協會。2017年2月18日。取自http://www.cga.org.tw/f_1_01_company_govern.aspx。金融監督管理委員會證券期貨局(2016) 。公司治理專區，台北：金融監督管理委員會。2017年1月23日。取自https://goo.gl/2HyTRi。台灣證券交易所 (2004)。公司治理簡介，台北：台灣證券交易所。2017年1月31日。取自http://www.twse.com.tw/ch/listed/governance/cg_01.php。李禮仲、鄧哲偉(2007)。「公司治理」對家族企業的效益，財團法人國家政策研究基金會。2017年2月16日。取自http://www.npf.org.tw/3/3447。林偉修(2016)。巴拿馬文件的暮鼓晨鐘，全球事務瞭望台。2017年2月21日。取自http://twhsglobal.weebly.com/23560389883541335542/-panama-papers。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系 104351023
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104351023
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of International Business] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
102301.pdf	605Kb	Adobe PDF2	89	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback