English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51632644      Online Users : 607
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/110300


    Title: 當代中國文化場域中的主體與絕爽
    Authors: 楊小濱
    Yang, Xiaobin
    Contributors: 台文所
    Keywords: 四种话语;拉康;主体;绝爽;Four discourses;Lacan;Subject;jouissance
    Date: 2014
    Issue Date: 2017-06-14 16:25:51 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文探讨的是当代中国文化场域内不同话语模式中所蕴含的不同主体功能，以及它所相应面临的不同快感维度。本文借用拉康有关四种话语的理论，论述四种不同的政治文化角色——主人能指、知识、小它物（objet petit ɑ）、分裂主体——如何由于处在不同地位上而形成不同的互动关系，特别是（分裂）主体的不同面貌，以及小它物作为创伤性快感——即“绝爽”（jouissance）——的各种意味。这四种话语形态在当代中国文化语境下表现如下的面向：（1）革命时代所建立的主人话语在主流意识形态上的主导功能；（2）后革命时代占重要地位的学院话语在现代社会、法律和商业体制中的首要作用；（3）分析师话语作为知识分子启蒙话语的具体表现，以及与其同构的倒错话语在娱乐文化中的意义；（4）癔症话语在先锋文学和艺术领域表达分裂主体的声音。This essay examines the different subjective functions in different modes of discourses，as well their different dimensions of jouissance. In light of the Lacanian concepts of the four discourses，I discuss how the four culturo-political roles—master signifier，knowledge，objet petit a，and split subject—form different relations and different subjective appearances，and especially the various significances of objet petit a as traumatic enjoyment，i.e.，jouissance. These four discourses express the following aspects in the context of contemporary Chinese culture：1）the dominant function of the master’s discourse established in the revolutionary era，in the mainstream ideology；2）the principal role of the university discourse in the postrevolutionary era in modern society，law and commercial institution；3）the analyst’s discourse as the specific expression of the enlightenment discourse，as well as the meaning of the pervert’s discourse in entertainment culture；and 4）the voice of the split subject in the hysteric’s discourse expressed in avant-garde literature and art.
    Relation: 文化研究, 17, 280-304
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[臺灣文學研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2562View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback