English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51763312      Online Users : 508
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109669


    Title: 如何終止分管契約之研究─以最高法院裁判為中心
    Authors: 吳瑾瑜
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 分管契約（約定）;分管契約（約定）之終止;專用權約定;民法第八百二十條第一項;公寓大廈共用部分
    Article 820 of the Civil Code;Covenant to manage the thing held in Indivision;Separate-Management Contract;Termination of Separate-Management Contract;Majority Rule;Absolute Unanimity
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2017-05-17 15:10:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 分管約定，倘係於98年7月23日民法第八百二十條第一項修正施行前業已成立、且未定有分管期限者，最高法院或臺灣高等法院或臺北地方法院之態度似乎皆為，共有人不能依民法第八百二十條第一項新規定之多數決方式予以終止。縱依98年7月23日施行之修正後民法第八百二十條，倘欲終止全體共有人合意之分管契約，乃變更管理，須經共有人全體同意，始得為之。總結來說，就分管約定之終止，各審級法院之立場一仍舊貫，完全不受第八百二十條第一項新修正規定之影響。
    According to the in 2009 revised Article 820 of the Civil Code : “Unless otherwise provided by a covenant, the management of the thing held in indivision, the consent of more than half of the Co-owners whose holding of ownership is more than half of the total share shall be required. But if the holding of ownership is more than two thirds, the numbers of consenting co-owners need not be taken into account.” The amendment adopt majority rule while abolishing the absolute unanimity. This research aims at investigating if the new enacted majority rule applies to termination of Separate-Management Contrac.The Analysis of the judgments pronounced by the Supreme Court since 2009
    shows however the stance of the Supreme Court on termination of Separate-Management Contract insists on absolute unanimity. The legal situation regarding termination of Separate-Management Contract still remains unchanged.
    Relation: MOST 103-2410-H-004-163
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    103-2410-H-004-163.pdf358KbAdobe PDF2289View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback