English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51620643      Online Users : 571
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/109611


    Title: 論英國離婚法改革的法制發展 --- 法政策、法理、法社會之探討
    Other Titles: Contextualizing Family Law Reform in UK
    Authors: 王曉丹
    Wang, Hsiao-Tan
    Contributors: 法科所
    Keywords: 英國離婚法;英國1996年家庭法令;法律改革;法律政策;英國1998年人權法令;家庭法法理;法律介入;法社會學研究;Family Law Act 1996 in UK;divorce law reform;law and social policy;Human Rights Act 1998 in UK;utilitarianism/rights discourse of family law,socio-legal study
    Date: 2006-09
    Issue Date: 2017-05-16 16:10:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 英國從60年代到今天，婚姻家庭型態已經產生巨火的轉變，離婚法的規定經過1969年的離婚修正法令以及1996年家庭法令第二部分的改革，在法之實踐層面上有著重大的轉變。一般知曉離婚法變遷的人，會將這樣的變遷稱爲從「過失離婚」到「無過失離婚」。本文試圖透過對於英國立法過程、立法社會政策與政策評估的討論，分析法律改革的法社會意涵，並論及此發展過程背後的法理基礎。離婚法改革所涉及的，不只是離婚的法定理山而已，從「過失離婚法」到「無過失離婚法」，常常涉及離婚程序的發展，以英國而言，即爲調解或商談程序的急速擴張。本文提出一個法制發展會涉及的三個面向：法政策、法理以及法社會。英國離婚法改革所涉及的立法／社會政策的辯論，其實是擺盪於兩個問題之間：法律是否應該成爲倡導某種社會價值的機制，以及法律足不足以改變人們的社會行爲。其次，在法理的層次，離婚法的改革深受學界的批評，反省的聲浪開始著眼於英國離婚法過於重視「效益」的實務操作，又因爲受到歐洲人權法的影饗，在實務上開始發展權利觀點的家庭法。法學界因而回過頭來思考家庭法中權利體系的可能形貌，並進一步清國家介入個人離婚事項的基本法理，尋求規範的適當介入方式。最後，英國離婚法改革的過程同時也是相關法社會研究不斷發展的過程，這些法社會研究常常以其研究的成果，反過頭來提出法律政革的主張，發揮決定性的影響。This paper sets up to explore the divorce law reform of UK, focusing on the shift in its underlying assumptions, objectives and techniques. The main argument centres around the second part of the Family Law Act 1996 which was withdrawn in 2001 after experimental pilots have shown its ineffectiveness. The discussions in this paper focus on the processes participated by the professionals and reflections made by different parts of society. There are three main issues identified in this paper. First, the divorce law reform in 1996 in Britain was formed mixed with four different approaches about family law and society and thus results to the contradictions in its possible practices. Second, the development of British family law from 1969 to 1996 was around the socio-legal debates between `utilitarianism` and `rights` discourse, especially in the area of legal practices. On the other hand, a new debate around individual autonomy/community values has raised the question of law`s intrusion in family issues, including its possibility and limitation. Third, socio-legal study in the area of family law has developed empirical as well as theoretical approaches which may provide meaningful indications for the development of family law in Britain.
    Relation: 台大法學論叢, Vol.35, No.5, pp.163-208
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.2006.35.05.04
    DOI: 10.6199/NTULJ.2006.35.05.04
    Appears in Collections:[法律科際整合研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    163-208-a.pdf5975KbAdobe PDF2392View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback