English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51819701      Online Users : 506
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 國際事務學院 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/108986


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/108986


    Title: 政權公約與日本民主治理的發展：以民主黨政權公約的運作為例
    Authors: 李世暉
    Contributors: 國際事務學院
    Keywords: 日本民主黨;民主治理;事業預算費用甄別;政權公約
    DPJ;democratic governance;budget screening;manifesto
    Date: 2016-02
    Issue Date: 2017-04-20 16:45:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 當代的民主政治是以政黨政治為主要運作形式，而以責任政治為重要內涵，並透過「制度性安排」的選舉，讓人民擁有機會選擇或淘汰組織政府、推行政務的政黨與政治人物。在此一民主政治運作的過程中，政權公約扮演「連繫機制」的作用，讓責任政治與政黨政治連結起來，也成為體現民主治理的重要機制。日本自2003 年實施政權公約制度之後，日本民主黨便積極以政權公約塑造政黨形象，並於2009 年完成政黨輪替而取得政權。民主黨在政權公約形成、落實與評價等各階段的政治活動，是促進當代日本政治的課責與實現民主治理的重要過程。然而，若實際探討民主黨內閣執行包括「事業預算費用甄別」在內的政權公約情形，可以發現其存在著三項本質上的限制：第一是受到政權公約類型的制約，第二是受到新政官關係的制約，第三是缺乏正確的自我評量工具。
    In the present age, the distinguishing features of democracy are the party politics and the responsive politics. Citizens could elect or re-elect the party and the politician through the institutional arrangement. In this democratic process, the manifesto plays the role of linkage mechanism. It is not only the linkage between party politics and the responsive politics, but also the mechanism of improving the democratic governance. After the implement of Manifesto system in 2003, the DPJ tried hard to form the new party image by focusing on the manifesto. The formation, enforcement and evaluation of DPJ’s manifesto could be considered as important process of Japan’s political accountability and democratic governance. However, the enforcement of DPJ government’s manifesto, for example the budget screening policy, was confronted by following three limiting factors: the types of the manifesto, the new relationship between politicians and bureaucrats, and the deficiency of right methods for valuing.
    Relation: 民主與治理, 3(1), 1-30
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際事務學院] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2488View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback