政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/105085
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51722576      在线人数 : 601
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/105085


    题名: 日治台灣〈小人國記〉、〈大人國記〉譯本來源辨析
    作者: 許俊雅
    Hsu, Chun-ya
    关键词: 台灣翻譯文學;《臺灣日日新報》;韋叢蕪;《格里佛遊記》;諷論文學;literature in translation in Taiwan;Taiwan Ri-Ri-Xin Bao;Cong-Wu Wei;Gulliver`s Travels;satire
    日期: 2015-12
    上传时间: 2016-12-19 15:02:01 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 日治台灣報刊刊登了不少譯作，或有署名，或未署名，其未署名者，通常被誤認為台灣文人之作。本文擬追索《臺灣日日新報》〈小人國記〉、〈大人國記〉譯本的來源，判讀所依據的版本，透過史料考證與各式文本交叉比對所得的結果，可以極為合理地判斷《臺灣日日新報》所刊行的〈小人國記〉與〈大人國記〉，乃是根據韋叢蕪的譯本《格里佛遊記》抄錄、修改而成。在比對過程同時對韋譯本的得失提出檢討，並從其譯本說明了當時台灣的抄譯改寫者對西方的語言、文學乃至於思想與歷史的文化背景都不甚熟悉，導致綏夫特原著中的諷刺意涵因為抄譯改寫者對韋叢蕪譯本的增刪、修改而面目全非，大大減弱了台譯本在當時的文學意義與價值。此研究所得將對前人之說予以反駁，並再次重申重視史料、尊重文本的必要性。
    Newspapers in Taiwan under Japanese rule published many literary works in translation, some authored, some not. Texts of the latter kind are usually mistaken for Taiwanese literati’s works. This essay traces the original source of “A Voyage to Lilliput” and “A Voyage to Brobdingnag” published by Taiwan Ri-Ri-Xin Bao in Chinese translation. Based upon examination of historical materials and the results of textual analysis comparing them to other translated texts, it is reasonable to judge that these texts in Taiwan Ri-Ri-Xin Bao are copied from Cong-Wu Wei’s Chinese translation of Jonathan Swift’s novel, with various alterations. In this analysis, Wei’s achievement in translation is evaluated, in light of which it is concluded that the Taiwanese editors, in reprinting Wei’s texts, were quite unfamiliar with Western language and literature, let alone the historical background of Western culture and thought. Consequently, the sense of irony exhibited by Swift’s English text, and to at least a certain extent also by Wei’s translation, is largely lost in the Taiwanese version due to the editors’ alteration. This means the significance and value of this work of literature in translation under the Taiwanese socio-cultural background must be severely qualified by this re-evaluation. The results of this research refute what was previously said about this text, and emphasizes again the importance of historical evidence and the need for respect for original texts.
    關聯: 臺灣文學學報,27,69-112
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[臺灣文學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    27(069-112).pdf3290KbAdobe PDF2547检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈