English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51637360      Online Users : 586
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 政大學報 > 第84期 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/102350


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102350


    Title: 國民中學生命教育課程目標之發展
    Other Titles: The Development of Curriculum Goals of Life Education in Junior High School
    Authors: 張美蘭
    Chang, Mei-Lan
    Keywords: 生命教育;生命教育課程目標;得懷術
    Life Education;Curriculum Goal of Life Education;Delphi Technique
    Date: 2002-07
    Issue Date: 2016-09-29 17:36:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要在發展「國民中學生命教育課程目標」，研究對象為36位專家學者以及任教於國中的教師，透過得懷術(Delphi technique)三次問卷的調查，最後獲得專家群一致性的意見。本研究結論主要有以下三點：1.就整體生命教育課程目標之重要性而言：五大題項之整體平均數介於4.24至4.35之間，可見每一題項的重要性與必要性。2.歸納專家意見所得：(1)生命教育應同時包含「生」與「死」的教育；(2)生命教育可適時與各學科結合。3.運用得懷術能有效的凝聚共識，以解決問題。本研究最後根據研究結果分別提出相關建議，以提供教育機關、學校實務工作者以及未來研究者之參考。
    The main purpose of this study was to develop curriculum goals of life education in junior high school. The experts were thirty-six professors and junior high school teachers. The author employed a three-round Delphi technique to extensively gain experts` professional knowledge and relevant experiences. Finally, the result achieved high consensus. The main results of this study could be concluded into following three points: 1.The means of the five categories were between 4.24 and 4.35. Fifty-four items were all achieved high consensus. 2.All experts` suggestions could be included two points: one was "Life education can simultaneously comprise life and death education." The other was "It is the best to fulfill life education by bringing it into subjects." 3.Using the Delphi technique can resolve difficult problems by getting many experts` ideas and achieve consensus. Finally, according to the results, suggestions were proposed for educational administration agencies, junior high school teachers and future researchers.
    Relation: 國立政治大學學報, 84, 119-154
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[第84期] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    fb160923113358.pdf2955KbAdobe PDF2705View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback