English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51674056      Online Users : 367
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 政大學報 > 第84期 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/102349


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/102349


    Title: 量價分離評估與現行公告土地現值評價方式之比較分析
    Other Titles: A Comparative Study of Segregation Assessment and Official Land Values Assessement
    Authors: 陳奉瑤
    Chen, Fung-Yiao
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 公告土地現值;評估比值;量價分離評價;標準宗地
    Official Land Value;Assessment Ratio
    Date: 2002-07
    Issue Date: 2016-09-29 17:36:03 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 公告土地現值為課徵土地增值稅的主要參考依據，其評估結果遭到諸多質疑，藉由相關文獻本文將其歸納為公平性與效率性二方面的問題。前者導因於垂直不公平稅賦，後者則來自市場交易價格的落差。針對此等缺失，部分文獻傾向以迴歸分析法分離影響地價因素，藉以作為短時間內查定人量土地價格的方式，然而受限於台灣土地交易價格與收益價格高度偏離的特性，恐有將非理性因素納入考量之疑慮，因而本文提出量價分離評估理念，並據以評估公告土地現值。本文藉由評估比值(assessment ratio)作為比較分析的工具，以不同價值土地之評估比率是否相等，檢視評價結果的公平性；以評估價格與市場交易價格比率接近一的程度，判斷其效率性。在市場交易價格合理可信的假設前提下，研究發現，以台南市安南區為例，藉由此方式評定公告土地現值，雖無法改善公平性問題，但卻可有效提高評價的效率性。
    The Official Land Value is the basis for the levying of Land Value Increment Tax in Taiwan. The assessed results of Official Land Value are always criticized. This paper, based upon literature review, argued those there exit equity and efficiency problems in current Official Land Value system. The former is resulted in the vertical inequity and the latter is caused from the gap between market price and Official Land Value. In order to solve these problems, some papers argued that the assessment of Official Land Value should use multi-regression method so as to know the factors, which influence the land price. However, in Taiwan, there exits a big gap between market and income value. Based upon the equity and efficiency viewpoint, this paper applies the concept of Segregation in Quantity and Value (SQV) to replace current Official Land Value method. Moreover, an empirical study, which adopts assessment ratio concept to examine the assessed results in order to judge the efficiency of both SQV and Official Land Value assessment, has been conducted. The results show there exists inequity on both methods. However, from the efficiency viewpoint, the method of SQV is much better than the current Official Land Value method.
    Relation: 國立政治大學學報, 84, 95-118
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[第84期] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    fb160923112840.pdf1985KbAdobe PDF2706View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback