| Reference: | 王光旭（2010）。行政中立的過去、現在與未來。T&D飛訊，107，1-19。
余致力（2000）。論公共行政在民主治理過程中的正當角色：黑堡宣言的內涵、定位與啟示。公共行政學報，4，1-29。
李翰林（2008）。民間聯盟參與1410億治水預算審查─政治機會結構的觀點。臺灣民主季刊，5(4)，87-128。
范玫芳、張簡妙琳（2014）。科學知識與水政治：旗山溪治水爭議之個案研究。人文及社會科學集刊，26(1)，133-173。
許濱松（1996）。文官制度與行政中立的設計與建立。政策月刊，18，18-19。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究(初版)。台北：五南。
陳宜君（2011）。行政中立制度之研究─以公務人員行政中立法為中心。國立中正大學法律學系碩士學位論文，未出版，嘉義。
陳敦源（2009）。民主治理：公共行政與民主政治的制度性調和(初版)。台北：五南。
陳敦源、呂佳螢（2009）。政治與行政的二分與重整？台灣文官態度與行為的實證分析。台灣公共行政暨公共事務系所聯合會(TASPPA)年會，高雄。
陳德禹（1993）。公共行政人員中立的理論與實際(上)。人事月刊，16(1)，5-10。
黃東益（2013）。從價值差異到夥伴關係—政務官事務官的互動管理。台北：五南。
經濟部水利署（2005）。易淹水地區水患治理綱要計畫，2005年7月5日，取自http://www.wra.gov.tw/public/Data/5122610151571.pdf。
經濟部水利署（2015）。易淹水地區水患治理計畫第3階段實施計畫執行情形及績效報告，2015年1月，取自http://file.wra.gov.tw/public/Data/5116162302.pdf。
審計部（2011）。中央政府易淹水地區水患治理計畫第2期特別決算審核報告，2011年7月28日，取自：http://www.audit.gov.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/80/pta_657_424 2473_73477.pdf。
審計部（2014）。中央政府易淹水地區水患治理計畫第3期特別決算審核報告，2014年7月29日，取自：http://www.audit.gov.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/attach/53/pta_1646_50 54073_13271.pdf。
潘淑滿（2003）。質性研究：理論與應用(初版)。台北：心理。
蔡良文（2003）。人事行政學：論現行考銓制度(二版)。台北：五南。
鄭國泰（2009）。證據為基礎的政策研究－理論與實務分析。台北：唐山。
Ali, H., Lim, H. & Len, P. (2004). An Impoverished Neutrality？Public Manager Value in Local Government, Penang, Malaysia. Local Government Studies, 30(1): 88-107.
Allison, G. T. (1986). The Power of Bureaucratic Routines: The Cuban Missile Crisis.In F. Rourke (Ed.), Bureaucratic Power in National Policy Making(pp. 87-105). Boston: Little, Brown.
Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social Choice and Individual Values(1st Ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Barker, A. & Wilson, G. (1997). Whitehall’s Disobedient Servants？Senior Officials’ Potential Resistance to Ministers in British Government Departments. British Journal of Political Science. 27(2): 223-246.
Caiden, G. E. (1996). The Concept of Neutrality,In H. K. Asmerom and E. P. Reis (Ed.),Democratization and Bureaucratic Neutrality (pp. 20-44). New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
Cooper, T. L. (2006). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role(5 Ed.). CA: Jossey-Bass.
Demir, T. & R. Nyhan. (2008). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence between Theory and Practice. Public Administration Review, 68(1): 81-96.
Demir, T. (2009). The Complementarity View: Exploring a Continuum in Political—Administrative Relations, Public Administration Review, 69(5): 876-888.
Dickinson, M. J. & A. Rudalevige. (2007). “Worked Out in Fractions”: Neutral Competence, FDR, and the Bureau of the Budget. Congress & the Presidency, 34(1): 1-26.
Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy(1st Ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.
Epstein, D. & S. O`Halloran.(1999). Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics. Approach to Policy Making. Under Separate Powers(1 Ed.). UK: Cambridge University Press.
Feiock, R. C., Moon-Gi, Jeong & J. Kim. (2003). Credible Commitment andCouncil-Manager. Government: Implications for Policy. Instrument. Choices.Public Administration Review, 63(5): 616-625.
Friedrich, C. J. (1940). The Nature of Administrative Responsibility. In P. Woll.(Ed.),Public Administration and Policy(pp. 221-246). New York: Harper Torch Books.
Goodnow, F. J. (1900).Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: Macmillan.
Golden, M. M. (1992).Exit, Voice, Loyalty, and Neglect: Bureaucratic Responses to Presidential Control During the Reagan Administration. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 2(1): 29-62.
Hay, C. (2004). Theory, Stylized Heuristic or Self-Fulfilling Prophecy?The Status of Rational Choice Theory in Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 82(1): 39-62.
Heclo, H. (1999). OMB and the Presidency-the problem of Neutral Competence. In F. Rourke (Ed.), Bureaucratic Power in National Policy Making(pp. 106-119). Boston: Little, Brown.
Horn, Murray J. (1995).The Political Economy of Public Administration（1st Ed.） New York: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, G. A. (2007). The Craft of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Interests and Influence in Governmental Regulation of Occupational Safety（1st Ed.） New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ingraham, P. W. (1995). The Foundation of Merit: Public Service in American Democracy(1 Ed.). Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kaufman, Herbert. (1956). Emerging Conflicts in the Doctrines of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 50(4): 1057-1073.
Kaufman, Herbert. (1960).The Forest Ranger: A study in Administrative Behavior(1 Ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Kirlin, J. J. (1996). The Big Questions of Public Administration in a Democracy.Public Administration Review, 56(5): 416-423.
Kriner, D. L. & A. Reeves. (2013). Presidential Particularism and Divide-the-Dollar Politics. Retrieved January 4, 2014, from
http://www.andrewreeves.org/sites/default/files/targeting.pdf
Levine, C. H., B. G. Peters, & F. J. Thompson.(1990). Public administration: Challenges, Choices, Consequences(3 Ed.). Glenview: Scott, Foresman.
Levitan, D. M. (1942).The Neutrality of the Public Service. Public Administration Review, 2(4): 317-323.
Maranto, R. & Skelley, D. (1992). Neutrality: An Enduring Principle of the Federal Service. Public Administration Review, 22(3): 173-187.
McCubbins, M. D., R. G. Noll. & B. R. Weingast.(1987). Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 3(2):243-277.
Meier, K. (1997).Bureaucracy and Democracy: The Case for More Bureaucracy and Less Democracy. Public Administration Review,57(4): 193-199.
Milgrom, P. & J. Roberts.(1992). Economics, Organization and Management. NJ: Prentice Hall.
Miller, G. & A. B. Whitford. (2007). The Principle’s Moral Hazard: Constrains on the Use of Incentives in Hierarchy. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 17(2): 213-233.
Miller, G. (1992). Managerial Dilemmas.(1 Ed.). New York: Cambridge.
Miller, G. (2000). Above Politics: Credible Commitment and Efficiency in the Design of Public Agencies. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 10(2): 289-327.
Moore, W. (1970).The Professions: Roles and Rules. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
Moe, T. (1993).Presidents, Institutions and Theory.(pp. 337-385)In G. C. Edwards III, J. H. Kessel, & B. A. Rockman.(Ed.), Researching the Presidency: Vital Questions, New Approaches. Pittsburgh, PA: Pittsburgh University Press.
Moe, T. (1997).The Positive Theory of Public Bureaucracy.(pp. 455-480)In Dennis C. Mueller.(Ed.). Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Moe, T. M. (1985). The New Economics of Organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4): 739-777.
Montjoy, R. S. & D. J. Watson. (1995). A Case for Reinterpreted Dichotomy of Politics and Administration as a Professional Standard in Council-Manager Government. Public Administration Review, 55(3): 231-239.
Moynihan, D. P. & A. Roberts (2010). The Triumph of Loyalty Over Competence: The Bush Administration and the Exhaustion of the Politicized Presidency. Public Administration Review, 70(4): 572-581.
Niskanen, W. A. (1991). A reflection on Bureaucracy and Representative Government.In André Blais & Stéphane Dion(Ed.),The Budget-Maximizing Bureaucrat(pp.13-29).Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rourke, F. (1992) Responsiveness and Neutral Competence in American Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review 52(Nov/Dec): 539-546.
Self, P. (1993).Government by the Market? The Politics of Public Choice(1 Ed.). London: Mcmillam Press.
Shepsle, K. A. & M. S. Bonchek. (1997). Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions(1 Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Starling, G. (2008).Managing the Public Sector(8 Ed.). Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.
Sundström, G. & Premfors, R. (2006, July).The Limits of Loyalty: Civil Servants` Role Perception within the Swedish Government Office. IPSA World Congress, Fukuoda.
Svara, J. H. (1985).Mission-Management Separation with Shared Responsibility for Policy and Administration. Public Administration Review, 45(1), 221-232.
Svara, J. H. (2001).The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176-183.
Svara, J. H. (2006). Complexity in Political-Administrative Relations and the Limits of the Dichotomy Concept. Administrative & Praxis, 28(1): 121-139.
Varian, H. R. (1996).Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach(4 Ed.).New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Wamsley, G. L. (1990) The Agency Perspective: Public: Public Administrators as Agential Leaders.(pp. 114-162) In Gary L. Wamsley…et al.(Ed.), Refounding Public Administration. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Weimer, D. L. & A. R. Vining. (2011). Policy Analysis(5 Ed.). Pearson.
Weimer, D. L. (2005) Institutionalizing Neutrally Competent Policy Analysis: Resources for Promoting Objectivity and Balance in Consolidating Democracies. Policy Study Journal 33(2): 131-146.
West,W. F. & R. F. Durant. (2000). Merit, Management, and Neutral Competence: Lessons from the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, FY 1988-FY 1997. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 111-122.
West,W. F, (2005a). Neutral Competence and Political Responsiveness: An Uneasy Relationship. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2): 147-160.
West,W. F, (2005b). The Institutionalization of Regulatory Review: Organizational Stability and Responsive Competence at OIRA. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 35(1): 76-93.
Wilson, W. (1887).The Study of Administration, Political Science Quarterly, 2(2): 197-222.
Wolf, P. (1999). Neutral and Responsive Competence: The Bureau of the Budget, 1939-1948, Revisited, Administration and Society 31(1): 142-167. |
