政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/101017
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51678942      線上人數 : 588
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/101017


    題名: 從美國司法判決看專利聯盟的今日與未來
    其他題名: The Development of Patent Pool under the Decision of CAFC Today and Tomorrow
    作者: 傅松青
    Fu, Song-Ching
    關鍵詞: 專利聯盟;專利濫用;必要專利;反托拉斯法;專利槓桿作用
    Patent pool;Patent misuse;Essential patent;Antitrust law;Patent leverage
    日期: 2013-06
    上傳時間: 2016-08-31 17:10:42 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 以專利作為創新技術於市場追求產業價值的保護傘，早為業界所奉行不悖，惟專利實施與專利濫用之分野界線何在，又應以專利法抑或反托拉斯法為判斷依據，隨著專利實施的態樣日趨多元複雜，成為法院難解的習題。為對專利實施之適法性爭議與評價有所瞭解，本文以美國聯邦巡迴上訴法院（下稱CAFC）自一九八二年成立以來有關專利濫用原則適用之極具指標意義的判決為觀察點，從CAFC試圖遠離聯邦最高法院（下稱最高法院）長期以專利法賦予權利人以排他權所及範圍作為判斷涉案實施專利行為是否構成專利濫用之準則，據限縮專利濫用原則之適用基調，援反托拉斯法為修正走向之工具，在這三十年間留下的軌跡，對專利權人共同組成專利聯盟使專利實施發揮最大效益之晚近主流實務型態，將產生何種影響？期透過對此具高度指標意義之一系列案件之重要爭點與法院見解加以介紹與探討，呈現出專利聯盟現有及應有的面貌。
    It has been practiced long to have patents function as the shields of innovation technology for the industry values of the market. However, perplexities of lines between patent practice and patent misuse and tests of patent misuse based on patent law or antitrust law become a real dilemma for the courts. For the purpose of sharing an overall picture of legitimacy and evaluation of patent practices, this article focuses on the track shaped by leading cases regarding application of patent misuse doctrine by confining the inquiry through antitrust rules since the establishment of CAFC in 1982, in order to illustrate that the CAFC has tried to circumvent the long-established rules of patent misuse doctrine of Supreme Court of condemning behaviors of patent holders beyond reach of patent grant. What is the impact of the CAFC holdings in the past three decades to the further development of patent pools? To present the look and the possible solution of the patent pool by following the steps of CAFC views on those landmarks would be the aim.
    關聯: 政大智慧財產評論, 11(1), 87-134
    NCCU Intellectual Property Review
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[智慧財產評論] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2546檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋