English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114205/145239 (79%)
Visitors : 52847575      Online Users : 323
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 俄羅斯學報 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/100852


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100852


    Title: 嘉慶時期中俄外交禮儀制交涉 ─ 以「封貢體制」概念分析
    Other Titles: The Negotiation of the Diplomatic Protocol System between China and Russia during Qing JiaQing Period-－An analysis based on “Tributary System” concept
    Authors: 陳維新
    Date: 2007-06
    Issue Date: 2016-08-30 14:17:23 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 嘉慶9年(1804年)，俄國政府任命葛羅普京伯爵(Count Golovkin)為全權大臣，率隊前往北京，欲與清朝政府商議貿易等相關事務。但是清朝政府卻將葛羅普京看成是俄國政府派來向嘉慶皇帝致敬的朝貢使臣。既是專為朝貢而來，當然須遵照大清朝貢禮儀體制─「封貢體制」行事，而大清帝國自開國以來處理對外關係的禮儀體制與西方傳統的外交禮儀體制不同，所以當葛羅普京率隊抵達庫倫時，就因外交禮儀體制觀念上的差異，與清朝政府官員發生爭議，雙方為外交禮儀行事問題爭辯甚久，葛羅普京堅持不願照清朝政府規定行事，清朝政府認為葛羅普京行徑傲慢無禮，最後葛羅普京無法進入北京即被遣回俄國。中俄雙方針對外交禮儀體制爭論焦點，及清朝政府堅持以「封貢體制」規定，要求俄方遵循，且未有絲毫的退讓，最終將葛羅普京遣回俄國。本文擬針對上述問題，以相關檔案史料為依據，加以研析探討。
    In the 9th year of JiaQing in Qing Dynasty (1804), Count Golovkin was appointed the minister plenipotentiary by Russian government. He and his mission then headed for Peking to confer with Qing government about trade affairs. Nevertheless, Qing government regarded them as a tribute mission sent by Russian government and asked them to comply with the protocol system of the Qing Empire, namely the “Tributary System”. Upon its establishment, the Empire of the Great Qing had a diplomatic protocol system different from occidental tradition. And therefore, when Golovkin mission arrived at Kulun, a long-lasting dispute over the divergence of the diplomatic protocol system was opened between Golovkin and Qing mandarins. On one hand Golovkin refused to follow the rules set by Qing government, and on the other Qing government deemed him arrogant and rude. China and Russia disputed over diplomatic protocol system, while Qing government insisted on the directives of “Tributary System”, urging Russia’s adherence, without the slightest concession. Golovkin was eventually repatriated back to Russia, failing to get into Peking. This essay intends to survey the above-mentioned subject based on archival materials.
    Relation: 俄羅斯學報, 6, 37-74
    Journal of Russian studies
    Vestnik instituta rossii
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[俄羅斯學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2828View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback