政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100488

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/100488

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51751077 Online Users : 516

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Liberal Arts > Department of Philosophy > Theses > Item 140.119/100488

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100488

Title:	沈岱爾自我觀之研究 A Study of Michael Sandel’s conception of the Self
Authors:	郭紹箕 Kuo, Shao Chi
Contributors:	何信全 Ho, Hsin Chuan 郭紹箕 Kuo, Shao Chi
Keywords:	沈岱爾自我觀金里卡泰勒自由主義社群主義共和主義政治哲學 Michael Sandel Will Kymlicka Charles Taylor conception of the self communitarianism liberalism republicanism political philosophy
Date:	2016
Issue Date:	2016-08-22 10:59:10 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本論文旨在藉由金里卡與泰勒之哲學角度對沈岱爾自我觀進行探討，以使當代自由主義與社群主義之論爭獲得進一步的理解與發展。本文主要針對沈岱爾自我觀中建構性不足的問題，以及由此所導致的共和主義政治哲學困境進行討論。文章架構主要分為四個部分：第一部分，藉沈岱爾對自由主義的批判觀點，疏理沈岱爾之自我觀論述。第二部分，透過自由民族主義者金里卡對沈岱爾的批判，探究沈岱爾自我觀的內部問題。第三部分，轉向泰勒之思想資源，從中探尋沈岱爾自我觀可能的補充觀點，以回應自由主義者之質疑。最後，綜合上述探討之結果，重新審視沈岱爾之自我觀，探尋其未來適當的發展進路。沈岱爾哲學的體系乃以其構成式自我觀為基礎，然而其自我觀論述之建構性不足，也造成其共和主義式的政治哲學主張所潛藏的問題。金里卡對沈岱爾的批判觀點，直接指出構成式自我觀的困境，導致沈岱爾最終必須向自由主義妥協，否則將對主體的自由形成威脅。然而，透過泰勒之自我觀的考察，本文將指出泰勒哲學中的詮釋學背景與本真性理想，能夠提供一種有別於自由主義的視域來解讀沈岱爾之自我觀。藉由上述的理解視域，將為沈岱爾哲學帶來一種不同於其當前發展的理想進路，化解自由主義對構成式自我觀的質疑，並使其能夠為當代自由主義與社群主義論爭提供更多深刻的思想與洞見。
Reference:	一、英文文獻 Abbey, Ruth (2004). “Timely Meditations in an Untimely Mode: The Thought of Charles Taylor”, in Ruth Abbey (Ed.), Charles Taylor (Cambridge University Press, New York), 1-28. Arenson, Richard and Ian Shapiro (1996). “Democratic Autonomy and Religious Freedom: A Critique of Wisconsin V. Yoder”, Political Order: Nomos, 38: 365-411. Aronovitch, Hilliard (2002) “From Communitarianism to Republicanism: On Sandel and His Critics”, Canadian journal of philosophy, 30/4: 621-647. Berlin, Isaiah (1969). Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, Oxford). Dreyfus, Hubert, L. (2004). “Taylor’s (Anti-) Epistemology”, in Ruth Abbey (Ed.), Charles Taylor (Cambridge University Press, New York), 52-83. Heidegger, Martin, trans. Dennis J. Schmidt (2010). Being and Time, (State University of New York, New York). Kymlicka, Will (1989). Liberalism, Community and Culture (Oxford University Press, New York) ── (1995). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights (Clarendon Press, Oxford). ── (1998). “Liberal Egalitarianism and Civic Republicanism: Friends or Enemies?”, in Anita L. Allen and Milton C. Regan (Eds.), Debating Democracy`s Discontent: Essays on American Politics, Law, and Public Philosophy (Oxford University Press, New York). ── (2002). Contemporary Political Philosophy: an Introduction, 2nd Ed. (Oxford University Press, New York). Mulhall, Stephan (2004). “Articulating the Horizons of Liberalism: Taylor’s Political Philosophy”, in Ruth Abbey (Ed.), Charles Taylor (New York: Cambridge University Press), 105-126. Mulhall, Stephan and Adam Swift (1996). Liberals & Communitarians, 2nd Ed. (Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass.). Nozick, Robert (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York) Pinkard, Terry (2004). “Taylor, ‘History,’ and the History of Philosophy”, in Ruth Abbey (Ed.), Charles Taylor (Cambridge University Press, New York), 187-213. Sandel, Michael (1982). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). ── (1984). “The Procedural Republic and The Unencumbered Self” in Shlomo Avineri and Avner de-Shalit (Eds.), Communitarianism and Individualism (Oxford University Press, Oxford). ── (1996). Democracy’s Discontent: American in Search of a Public Philosophy (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (1998a). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, 2nd Ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). ── (1998b). "Reply to Critics", in Anita L. Allen and Milton C. Regan, Jr (Eds.), Debating democracy`s discontent: essays on American politics, law, and public philosophy (Oxford University Press, New York). 319-336. ── (2005). Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (2007). The Case against Perfection: Ethic in the Age of Genetic Engineering (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (2009). Justice: What’s the Right Thing to DO? (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York). ── (2012). What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York). Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (1993). Political Liberalism (Columbia University Press, New York). Taylor, Charles (1975). Hegel (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). ── (1979). Hegel and Modern Society (Cambridge University Press, New York). ── (1985). Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge). ── (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (1991). The Ethics of Authenticity (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). ── (1995). Philosophical Arguments (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.). 二、中文文獻何信全（2002）<儒家政治哲學的前景：從當代自由主義與社群主義論爭脈絡的考察>。收入黃俊傑主編：《傳統中華文化與現代價值的激盪與調融》台北：喜瑪拉雅基金會，頁207-228。江宜樺（1997）<社群主義的國家認同觀>。收入《政治科學論叢》，第八期，頁85-110。林火旺（1992）<多元價值和「對」的優先性>，收入《臺灣大學哲學論評》，第二十五期，頁35-52。 ── (1995)<自由主義可否建立一個政治社群>。收入陳秀容、江宜樺主編：《政治社群》，台北：中研院社科所，頁249-270。 ── (1998)《羅爾斯正義論》，台北：臺灣書店。 ── (2000) <自由主義可否包容多元文化論？>。收入《社教雙月刊》，第一百期，頁20-27。芮逸夫主編（1971）《雲五社會科學大辭典：第十冊-人類學》，台北：商務。黃俊傑（2015）<東亞儒家「仁」學的起點：修身理論的核心概念>，收入蔡振豐、林永強、張政遠編：《東亞傳統與現代哲學中的自我與個人》，台北：國立臺灣大學出版中心。錢永祥（1995）<社群關係與自我之構成：對沈岱爾社群主義論證的檢討>，收入陳秀容、江宜樺主編：《政治社群》，台北：中研院社科所，頁297-314。曾國祥（2003）<論沈岱爾之行動性理論：一個哲學保守主義的重塑>，收入《政治與社會哲學評論》，第六期，頁65-114。輔仁神學著作編譯會編（1996）《神學辭典》，台北：光啓出版社。應奇（1999）《社群主義》，台北：揚智。 Aristotle著，高思謙譯（2006）《尼各馬科倫理學》，台北：商務。 Charles Taylor著，韓震等譯（2001）《自我的根源：現代認同的形成》，南京：譯林。 Kant著，鄧曉芒譯（2004）《純粹理性批判》，北京：人民出版社。 ── (2004)《實踐理性批判》，台北：聯經。 Kant著，李明輝譯（1989）《道德底形上學之基礎》，台北：聯經。 Richard E. Palmer著，嚴平譯（1992）《詮釋學》，台北：桂冠。
Description:	碩士國立政治大學哲學系 102154002
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102154002
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Philosophy] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
400201.pdf	14132Kb	Adobe PDF2	900	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback