 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113822/144841 (79%)
Visitors : 51824716
Online Users : 535
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100437
|
| Title: | 投之以羊血，報之以水果： 台灣文學獵人之禮做為 個人、群體和生態的認同象徵 |
| Other Titles: | The Gift of the Taiwan Indigenous Literary Hunter and the Construction of Individual, Tribal and Ecological Identity |
| Authors: | 石岱崙
Sterk, Darryl |
| Keywords: | 台灣原住民文學;禮物理論;認同
Taiwan indigenous literature;gift theory;identity |
| Date: | 2012-03 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-08-18 17:43:14 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 在台灣原住民族文學作品中，「禮物」多半是由獵人贈與，而大部分的獵人也是贈禮者，筆者把這文學獵人之禮詮釋為個人、群體和生態的認同象徵。這樣的詮釋以人類學禮物理論為基礎。人類學家認為獵人的禮物是其自尊與部落地位的基礎，進而區分禮物與商品，前者建立人際關係以及人群與大自然的關係，也就是「生態」關係，而後者建立「物際」關係，即商品與商品之間的價值關係。以禮物為主的社會因此有群體化的趨勢;以商品交易為主的群體會分裂，變得個人化。本文將這個詮釋架構應用在當代台灣原住民族文學研究上。文學中的禮物是虛構的，當然不能視為簡單的社會鏡像;本文把虛構禮物視為作家用來探討當代原住民族認同的象徵，而為了要質疑獨立個體的概念，筆者把認同分為個人、群體和生態認同三個面相。討論的作品是霍斯陸曼‧伐伐的〈獵人〉、奧維尼‧卡露斯的〈永恆的歸宿〉、巴代的〈薑路〉及田雅各的〈最後的獵人〉;從〈獵人〉到〈最後的獵人〉，原住民部落被納入現代國際經濟體系，因而變得個人化，原住民作家面對這樣的情況自然會思考、建構或重構變化中的原住民認同。最後，筆者會做出方法論的自我批判，以利日後更進一步的跨界文化研究。
In Taiwanese aboriginal literature, most gifts are given by hunters and most hunters are gift givers. I see these fictional gifts as symbols of personal, tribal and ecological identity. I advance this interpretation based on my reading of anthropological gift theory. Anthropologists have described hunter’s gifts as the foundation of social standing, and have gone on to discriminate between gifts and commodities; the former conducive to the formation of interpersonal and ecological relations—relations between people and nature—and the latter conducive to the formation of relations of value between commodities. Societies in which gift giving is the main form of exchange will tend to be communal, while those in which commodity exchange predominate will splinter. This article applies this interpretive framework to the study of contemporary Taiwanese indigenous literature. The gifts I discuss are literary, so we cannot see them as simple reflections of social practice. Rather, I would view them as symbols contemporary aboriginal writers use to contemplate identity. In order to question the notion of the independent individual, I divide identity into three aspects, personal, social and ecological. I discuss Husluma Vava’s “The Hunter,” Auvini Kadresengan’s “Home to Return To,” Ba Dai’s “Ginger Road,” and Topas Tamapima’s “The Last Hunter.” From “The Hunter” to “The Last Hunter,” aboriginal villages have been drawn into the international economic order, fragmenting in this process. Facing fragmentation, aboriginal writers not only contemplate but also try to construct or reconstruct indigenous identity. I end with a methodological self-critique, as an aid to further comparative research. |
| Relation: | 文化越界,1(7),121-146
Cross-cultural Studies |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [文化越界 ] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 1(7)p121-146.pdf | | 546Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 490 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
