English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51725779      Online Users : 618
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100283


    Title: 科技接受行為模式之整合分析－三個主要模式之比較
    Other Titles: An Integrated Analysis of Technology Acceptance Behaviour Models: Comparison of Three Major Models
    Authors: 任維廉;呂堂榮;劉柏廷
    Jen, William;Lu, Tim;Liu, Po-Ting
    Keywords: 科技接受行為;科技接受模式;結合計畫行為理論與科技接受模式;科技接受與使用統一理論
    Technology Acceptance Behaviours;Technology Acceptance Model;Combined Theory of Planned Behaviour and Technology Acceptance Model;Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2016-08-16 15:44:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著科技的發展，公司開始引進各種新的科技設備，因此員工對科技的接受行為已經成為相當熱門的議題。研究者建構許多科技接受行為模式，其中以理性行動理論所延伸的一系列模式最為完整，此外也有研究者以創新擴散理論、社會認知理論與動機理論等，建構不同的科技接受行為模式。然而眾多的理論模式卻令研究者面臨研究模式選擇與建構上的困難。因此，本研究由眾多模式中選擇最具有代表性的三個模式，分別為科技接受模式、結合計畫行為理論與科技接受模式、科技接受與使用統一理論，並根據模式的豐富性與精簡度分析各模式的優缺點。研究結果顯示，並非複雜的模式就具有較佳的解釋能力，反而是模式結構較為簡單的科技接受模式兼具有豐富性與精簡度的優點。
    With the development of technology, the company begins to introduce various kinds of technological equipment. Hence, technology acceptance behaviours have become a famous issue. Researchers also construct many technology acceptance behaviour models. Among them a series models in which extended from Theory of Reasoned Action are the most complete. There are also other models construct from different theories, such as Innovation Diffusion Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, and Motivation Theory. However, various models make researchers more difficult to choose and construct a research model. Therefore, this study selects 3 most representative models which include Technology Acceptance Model, Combined Theory of Planned Behaviour and Technology Acceptance Model, and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Comparing 3 models` richness and parsimony can help to identify their characteristics. According to the research results, the complex models do not necessarily have better explanation ability. On the contrary, the Technology Acceptance Model concurrently has advantage of richness and parsimony.
    Relation: 資管評論, 15(1), 101-138
    MIS review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[MIS review(資管評論)] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15(1)-101-138.pdf1483KbAdobe PDF2422View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback