English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51615563      Online Users : 620
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100194


    Title: 憲政規則與理性選擇：台灣少數政府的存續（2000～2008）
    Other Titles: Constitutional Rules and Rational Choice: Explanations for the Survival of Taiwan`s Minority Government (2000~2008)
    Authors: 李俊達
    Lee, Chun-Ta
    Keywords: 倒閣;不信任案;少數政府;政府存續;理性選擇
    Legislative Vote of Non-Confidence;Minority Government;Government Survival;Rational Choice
    Date: 2011-10
    Issue Date: 2016-08-16 13:34:18 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 2000年政黨輪替後，開啟台灣長達八年的民進黨少數政府時期。一般而言，政府的「成立」與「存續」是兩個不同的課題，因為除典型總統制之外，其他憲政體制下的行政部門在成立後隨時都有可能面臨議會的不信任，遭受倒閣去職。顯然地，由於未能「保證」獲得議會多數支持，少數政府在成立之後的存續基礎最為薄弱，隨時可能基於議會多數的不信任案而終結。就台灣的情況而言，少數政府的成立主要為憲法增修條文第三條第一項「總統行使行政院院長任命權」所致，但少數政府的存續則是受到其他與倒閣相關的憲法規定影響。本文將立基Bergman所提出「政府成立」的憲政規則概念，延伸為「政府解散」的憲政規則，並結合Strom提出的在野政黨理性選擇觀點，試圖解釋台灣的少數政府存續現象，認為民進黨少數政府的存續乃是在野政黨針對憲法「倒閣」規定所做的理性選擇。
    After the government change over in at 2000, the power over the executive department was gained by President Chen Shui-bian and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), whose presence in the Legislative Yuan never became a majority until 2008. Generally speaking, there are distinctions between "formation" and "survival" of a government. Excluding presidential systems, all executive departments can be potentially dismissed by submitting act from a legislative non-confidence vote in any constitutional regime. A minority government, therefore is pretty fragile due to the lack of "trust" from parliament as a supporting foundation. In Taiwan`s case, the DPP minority government is primarily based on the Additional Article § 3.1. This article combines Bergman`s standpoint of negative constitutional rules and Strom`s perspective on opposition rational choice and tries to clarify the survival of DPP minority government from the opposite majority`s rational considerations.
    Relation: 社會科學論叢, 5(2), 2-33
    Journal of Social Sciences
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[社會科學論叢] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5(2)-2-33.pdf3209KbAdobe PDF2421View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback