English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51717674      Online Users : 592
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100134


    Title: 從「隱喻」到「權力意志」:尼采前後期思想中的語言、認識與真理
    Other Titles: From “Metaphor” to “Will to Power”:Language, Knowledge and Truth in Nietzsche’s Early and Late Thoughts
    Authors: 劉滄龍
    LIU, Tsang-Long
    Keywords: 隱喻;權力意志;語言;認識;真理
    Metaphor;Will to Power;Language;Knowledge;Truth
    Date: 2013-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 16:08:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 尼采於 1873 年寫就的未出版論文〈論非關道德意義下的真理與謊言〉在其哲學思想的成形歷程中佔有特殊的地位,它展示了尼采早期思想中語言與詮釋、認識與真理、藝術與哲學的內在關聯性。該文主張:「隱喻」(Metapher) 標誌著人類根本的詮釋活動,理性的認識能力也不外乎身體此一詮釋性的存在所引發的「構造隱喻的驅力」(Trieb zur Metapherbildung)。「隱喻」不僅是掌握尼采早期思想的關鍵概念,我們還可以它為線索來聯繫散佈在尼采早期未出版著作中的相關見解,並把這些觀點與尼采思想成熟期所提出的「權力意志」(Wille zur Macht) 的理論勾連起來,以說明貫穿前後期思想發展的內在理路。因此,本文主張「隱喻」是「權力意志」的理論前身。在早期思想中「隱喻」被當成語言與思考的運作機制,到了「權力意志」則擴展為更全面的生命詮釋原理,主體的內在多元性得到了完整的表達。
    Written in 1873, Nietzsche’s unpublished essay “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” plays a unique role in the formation of Nietzsche’s thought. It shows the interrelations of language and interpretation, knowledge and truth, art and philosophy in Nietzsche’s early thought. In this essay, Nietzsche claims that “metaphor” indicates the fundamental human activities of interpretation. The knowing faculty of reason is also originated in the “drives to build the metaphors”, which are resulted from the body—interpretative being. “Metaphor” does not only serve as the key concept for us to probe into Nietzsche’s early thought, with it, Nietzsche’s seemingly sporadic ideas scattering in his early unpublished writings can be better connected. By comparing the concepts of “metaphor” and “will to power”, the implicit clues running through the Nietzsche’s early and late thoughts will be demonstrated. Moreover, “will to power”, as a revised notion of “metaphor”, reveals Nietzsche’s stance of his mature works. This paper suggests that “metaphor” is the primitive model of “will to power”. “Metaphor” in Nietzsche’s early thought is defined as a mechanism of speech and thinking. This idea is transformed into a more comprehensive interpretative principle of life, and this is what is termed “will to power”. The internal plurality of subject is best illustrated in Nietzschean “will to power”.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 29, 1-32
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    29-1-32.pdf913KbAdobe PDF2254View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback