English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51718860      Online Users : 639
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100129


    Title: 論《述朱質疑》 對「朱陸異同」的評析效力
    Other Titles: Sort Some Questions of Zhu Xi (Shu Zhu Zhi Yi): The validity of its observations of “the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu”
    Authors: 蔡龍九
    tsia, Lung-Chiu
    Keywords: 《述朱質疑》;朱陸異同;朱子早年
    Sort Some Questions of Zhu Xi (Shu Zhu Zhi Yi);the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Liu;the young Zhu Xi
    Date: 2012-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 16:07:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文欲談論夏炘之《述朱質疑》一書中所談及的兩個重要內容：一是對於「朱陸異同」的看法，另一是夏炘在此議題上的延伸出對「朱子早年思想」的釐清。在《述朱質疑》一書中，夏炘基本上認同前人對陸王之學的批評，因此也反對「朱陸同」，然而針對陳建《學蔀通辨》一書中的「朱子早年同於陸子之禪」不甚滿意，而延伸至他對「朱子早年學說」的一些釐清與捍衛。其中包含了他對前人論述「朱陸異同」的一些修正，以及對王懋竑《朱子年譜》的反對。因此，在《述朱質疑》一書中夏炘花了許多篇幅強調朱子「早年思想非僅有佛老」，且回歸聖學的時間點早於王懋竑《朱子年譜》的記載。筆者針對上述層面一一論述之，並於文末中評析夏炘的論述效力，以及《述朱質疑》此書的貢獻處。
    This paper aims to investigate two cruxes of Jia Xin’s Sort Some Questions of Zhu Xi (Shu Zhu Zhi Yi). One is the argument proposed by Jia Xin concerning “the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu,” and the other is how, deduced from the previous argument, Jia Xin accurately clarifies the issue of “the young Zhu Xi.” In Sort Some Questions of Zhu Xi (Shu Zhu Zhi Yi), he tacitly sides with those who critique Liu Xiang Shan and Wang Yang Ming and overtly disapproves “the similarities and dissimilarities between Zhu and Lu.” However, Jia Xin defies the assertion concerning “the coincident influences of Buddhism on the young Zhu Xi and Liu Xiang Shan” advocated in Chen Jian’s The Clarification of the Veiled Theories (Xiao Bu Tong Bian), and takes the position to defend and expound the “the young Zhu Xi.” In his work, he amends the previous critiques on “the similarities and dissimilarities between Chu and Lu,” and criticizes Wang Mao Hong’s Chronological Biography of Zhu Xi (Zhu Zi Nian Pu). Accordingly, he makes an effort to emphasize that the thinking of the young Zhu Xi is not confined to Daoism and Buddhism, and Zhu Xi’s assimilation to Confucianism is earlier than the recordation of Wang Mao Hong’s Chronological Biography of Zhu Xi (Zhu Zi Nian Pu). In this paper, I will elucidate those issues mentioned above one by one, followed by my evaluation on the validation of Jia Xin’s arguments, as well as the merits of Sort Some Questions of Zhu Xi (Shu Zhu Zhi Yi).
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 27, 75-116
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    27-75-116.pdf572KbAdobe PDF2145View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback