English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51707089      Online Users : 505
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/100087


    Title: 康德於《單在理性範圍內之宗教》中的自由理論
    Other Titles: The Theory of Freedom in Kant’s Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft
    Authors: 陳士誠
    Chen, Shih-Chen
    Keywords: 自由;歸責;物自身;意識;義務
    freedom;thing in itself;consciousness
    Date: 2006-01
    Issue Date: 2016-08-11 15:24:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 這篇論文的目的是探討康德在《單在理性範圍內的宗教》(以下簡稱《宗教》)一書中的自由理論,而非對其整體的自由理論的全面探討,但我還是對《宗教》一書之前的自由理論作相對簡單的闡述與批評,以作為論證的歷史發展的準備性工作。康德的倫理學是基於作為物自身的自由與作為現象的感性之對立,但如是並不能說明道德如何可能,而只能界限出事實與倫理。在《宗教》一書中,他理解到自由不一定要從物自身上探討,釐清了感性在倫理學的角色,嘗試從先驗意識層面上的對立來理解自由,作為抉擇符合或違反義務的最高條件,是使歸責可能的能力,他\\r統一了在意念中相衝突的存心。因而現象與物自物之區分的形上學困難便得到解決。
    In this paper I would not discuss the whole theory of Kant’s freedom, but only the theory in Religion. It is necessary to show the historical development of the concept of freedom in the early works in order to explore why Kant changes the understanding of the concept in this religious work. His ethics depends on the conflict between freedom as thing in itself and sense as appearance. Such understanding doesn’t make the moral as such possible, but only defines the difference between fact and moral. In Religion he shows that it is not necessary to understand the concept of freedom from the viewpoint of thing in itself. He makes clear the role of sense in his ethic and tries to show the concept of freedom through the conflict in the transcendental consciousness as the highest condition of determination for duty or against duty. It is the true ability, which makes the imputation possible because of those free Gesinnungen der Willkür. The freedom unites such Gesinnungen in the conflicts der Willkür. Therefore the metaphysical difficulties with difference between thing in itself and appearance is solved.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 15, 49-80
    The national Chengchi university philosophical
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    15-49-80.pdf210KbAdobe PDF2216View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback