English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112840/143814 (78%)
Visitors : 49873816      Online Users : 632
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99928


    Title: 合作學習相關閱讀教學模式成效統合：後設分析結果間一致性探討
    Other Titles: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Cooperative Model f Reading: Does the Taiwan Result Falsify or Verify Previous Findings?
    Authors: 謝進昌
    Keywords: 交互教學;合作學習;後設分析;閱讀理解
    reciprocal instruction;cooperative learning;meta analysis;reading comprehension
    Date: 2014-12
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 17:01:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在使用後設分析以統合國內合作學習相關閱讀教學研究，經對照國內、外相似主題之研究統合文獻，了解彼此存在的一致或不一致性，為研究結果提供更穩定的聚斂或區別效度，而研究者以數個關鍵字就國內資料庫進行檢索，經對照納入與排除準則後，就93篇文獻進行訊息編碼與後設分析。整體而言，分析結果及相關文獻的對照，顯示此教學模式對於閱讀理解的立即及延宕成效大致具有介於小至中等程度的教學成效，其中，以交互教學同時具有較穩定的研究證據支持，而在調節因素探討方面，本研究發現兩組間前測表現差異校正與否是影響彼此統合結果不一致的關鍵。最後，研究者於文末提出幾點建議供未來實務工作者、研究者參考。
    Reading instruction has evolved into more interactional and active forms in recent decades, and past evidences from meta-analyses showed that students comprehend more in reading when they learn together than when they learn alone. But some conflicting results across different meta analyses regarding the same theme were sometimes ignored, and this may also lead to be overconfident on the effect of instruction. The first goal of this study is to meta-analyze the effect of cooperative model of reading from Taiwan articles. The second goal is to compare the results derived from this study to findings from other previous relevant review studies. The procedure through this research was undertaken via systematic review. After few keywords were made in searching Taiwan database, 93 articles were finally coded and meta-analyzed on the basis of five inclusion and exclusion rules. Overall speaking, an average effect size between lower and medium level was explored in my studies. Furthermore, moderator analysis showed quality of studies or adjusted for pretest difference or not may have impact on the inconsistency between past meta analyses and this study. Finally, some suggestion and implication were proposed for future usage.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 37(4),83-111
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102498852014123704004
    DOI: 10.3966/102498852014123704004
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    37-4(83-111).pdf6283KbAdobe PDF2331View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback