English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50916228      Online Users : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99922


    Title: 應用模糊網絡分析法建構教育學門系所評鑑指標體系
    Other Titles: Using Fuzzy Analytic Network Process to Build a System of Evaluation Indicators for Education Departments and Graduate Schools
    Authors: 林筠諺
    Keywords: 教育學門;評鑑指標;模糊網絡分析法;網絡分析法
    education domain;evaluation indicator;fuzzy analytic network process;analytic network process
    Date: 2014-06
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 16:31:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 建構教育學門系所評鑑指標體系有助於確認教育學門系所評鑑的重要向度，提供系所經營和提升教育品質參考。本研究釐清教育學門系所評鑑指標意涵，從教育法規規範、教育評鑑論述、品牌評估觀點討論評鑑項目，自評鑑向度、評鑑指標和評鑑理念層面思考指標發展議題，構建出三個層級的評鑑指標體系架構。結合模糊網絡分析法與整合專家看法，提出由行政管理、環境設備、課程規劃、教師教學、學生學習、專業表現、經營成效等向度構成的教育學門系所評鑑指標體系，包括17個次向度與65項評鑑指標。分析結果顯示七個評鑑向度具高關聯性，學生學習情形和師生專業表現兩向度最為重要。
    To construct a system of evaluation indicators is an important issue, which not only provides an objective viewpoint to improve the quality of departments and graduate schools, but also shows what is considered as crucial in management and teaching. However, it should be criticized that is whether similar standards of evaluation could also be used in different fields of departments and graduate schools. Thus, based on the specification of educational code, the theory of educational evaluation and band management, this study applied Fuzzy Analytic Network Process to construct key performance appraisal indicators for educational departments and graduate schools. The research showed that the conceptual framework of the evaluation indicator system containing 7 dimensions, which including administrative management, environment and equipment’s, curriculum planning, faculty’s teaching, student’s learning, professional performance, and operative outcomes, while 17 sub-dimensions and 65 indicators are also presented. Meanwhile, the results of the study also found that student’s learning and professional performance are more emphasized than others.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 37(2),67-93
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966/102498852014063702003
    DOI: 10.3966/102498852014063702003
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    37-2-3.pdf13709KbAdobe PDF2704View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback