English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48263001      Online Users : 321
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99882


    Title: 以團體互動歷程的觀點探討凝聚力對科學創造力之影響
    Other Titles: Investigating the Influences of Cohesion on Scientific Creativity: A Group Interaction Processes Perspective
    Authors: 陳毓凱;劉錦駿;洪振方
    Keywords: 科學創造力;凝聚力
    scientific creativity;cohesion
    Date: 2012-03
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 14:53:49 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究透過認知與人際等團體互動歷程的觀察，進而探討不同凝聚力小組其科學創造力的差異。研究工具包括科學創造力測驗、凝聚力測驗、同儕關係問卷，以及對話分析指標。研究對象為新北市某國小的36位五年級學生，計有高、中、低凝聚力小組各四組。研究發現如下：一、高凝聚力組的認知互動陳述數量較多，顯示其在討論過程中提出較多的想法；二、中凝聚力組在「表達不贊同」之人際互動陳述數量較多，顯示討論過程中出現較多反對意見；三，高凝聚力組較低凝聚力組有更佳的科學創造力表現；四、高凝聚力組出現較多認知互動陳述的對話機制為在討論過程中延伸他人的意見；五、各凝聚力小組皆較少藉由反對意見的出現來延伸討論並修改想法。
    The purpose of this research was to investigate the scientific creativity from different cohesion groups by observing the group interaction processes. The research tool included scientific creativity test, group cohesion questionnaire, peer relationship questionnaire, and discourse analysis indexes. The objects were thirty-six fifth graders form Taipei County and divided into high, medium, low cohesion groups respectively. The main results were as following: first, the high cohesion groups had more cognitive interaction utterances. It revealed the students brought up more ideas during the discussion. Second, the medium cohesion groups have more negative interpersonal interaction utterances. It revealed the students proposed more opposites during the discussion. Third, the high cohesion groups performed better on scientific creativity than low cohesion groups. Fourth, the discourse mechanism for more cognitive interaction utterances on high cohesion groups was following others’ opinions during the discussion. Fifth, all cohesion groups seldom extended discussing and revised ideas after expressing disapprovals.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 35(1),29-56
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    35(1)-29-56.pdf11377KbAdobe PDF2194View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback