政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99828
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112879/143845 (78%)
Visitors : 49975774      Online Users : 535
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99828


    Title: 日本電力產業的管制體制改革
    The Regulatory Reform of Electricity Sector in Japan
    Authors: 王鴻儒
    Wang, Hung Ru
    Contributors: 蔡中民
    Tsai, Chung Min
    王鴻儒
    Wang, Hung Ru
    Keywords: 日本
    電力產業
    管制改革
    Japan
    Electricity Sector
    Regulatory Reform
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-08-09 11:56:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文主要目的在於以日本的電力產業為案例，探討東亞國家的經濟管制改革經驗，有鑒於日本在電力產業管制的失靈導致了電力零售市場自由化效果有限及人為安全管制疏失造成福島核災，本研究要回答的問題是：如何解釋日本電力產業的管制失靈？在福島核災的影響下，為何核電安全與電力市場管制體系出現不同程度的制度變遷？透過檔案與文獻資料的分析，作者發現制度設計的瑕疵是管制失靈的主因，而在鐵三角網絡的運作下造成的管制俘虜也可以解釋為什麼會產生這些制度。在福島核災後，由於主要行為者的偏好並未改變，因此核電安全管制的改革效果有限，在電力市場自由化改革方面，由於行為者的合作模式受到挑戰，METI與用電大戶的企業一起促成電力市場制度改革。
    The main purpose of this thesis is to study the experience of regulatory reform in East Asia. By examining Japan’s electricity industry, this thesis answers the question that how to explain the regulatory failure in the power sector in Japan, including the government failed to establish a competitive electricity market and to prevent the 311 disaster in Fukushima. This thesis also illustrates the various impacts of Fukushima tragedy on the nuclear safety regulations and the structure of electricity market in Japan. Based on the research findings, the author argues that the failure in regulations results from the flawed institutions which were formulated through “regulatory capture” done by the interaction among “iron triangle” in the electricity sector. After the nuclear disaster, the vested interests did not shift their preference in the nuclear industry, which led to the limited reform in nuclear safety regulations. The structure of electricity market has changed better than nuclear safety regulations because of the competition-oriented policies implemented by METI.
    Reference: 王京明、杜家雯與郭婷瑋，2008，《電業自由化改革之國際間比較與評鑑》，台北：中華經濟研究院。
    左重慶，2015，〈日本電業自由化之發展趨勢、影響與啟示（上）〉，《台電月刊》，631，http://tpcjournal.taipower.com.tw/article/index/id/188。
    戒能一成，2007，〈電力自由化はいかなる効果をもったか〉，載於《規制改革の経済分析 : 電力自由化のケース.スタディ》，八田達夫,田中誠主編，東京都 : 日本経済新聞出版社。
    経済産業省，2013，〈電力システム改革専門委員会報告書〉，経済産業省，電力システム改革専門委員会，http://www.meti.go.jp/committee/sougouenergy/sougou/denryoku_system_kaikaku/pdf/report_002_01.pdf。
    陳敦源，2001，〈新制度論的範圍與方法：一個理性選擇觀點的方法論檢視〉，《行政暨政策學報》3: 129-184。
    朝日新聞特別報導部，2014，《原発利権を追う 電力をめぐるカネと権力の構造》，東京都：朝日新聞出版社。
    歐宏麟、林伯相與高志宏，2010，〈電價調整機制及電力市場自由化制度研習報告〉，《行政院及所屬各機關出國報告書》，公務出國報告資訊網：http://open.nat.gov.tw/reportwork。
    蔡中民，2014，〈論政府管制：一個政治經濟學的觀點〉，《政治學報》，57: 31-51。
    Amable, Bruno and Stefano Palombarini. 2009. “A Neorealist Approach to Institutional Change and The Diversity of Capitalism.” Socio-Economic Review 7: 123–143.
    Aoki, Masahiko, Kevin Murdock, and Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara. 1998. “Beyond The East Asian Miracle: Introducing the Market-Enhancing View”. In The Role of Government in East Asian Economic Development: Comparative Institutional Analysis, eds. Masahiko Aoki, Hyung-Ki Kim, and Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara. Clarendon Press: Oxford.
    Aoki, Masahiko. 2001. Toward a Comparative Institutional Analysis. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
    Asano, Hiroshi. 2006. “Regulatory reform of the electricity industry in Japan: What is the next step of deregulation?” Energy Policy 34(16): 2491–2497.
    Capoccia, Giovanni and R. Daniel Kelemen. 2007. “The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism.” World Politics 59(3): 341-369.
    Carlile, Lonny E. and Mark C. Tilton. 1998a. “Regulatory Reform and the Developmental State”.In Is Japan Really Changing Its Ways? Regulatory Reform and the Japanese Economy, eds. Lonny E. Carlile and Mark C. Tilton. Brookings Institution Press: Washington, D.C.
    Carlile, Lonny E. and Mark C. Tilton. 1998b. “Is Japan Really Changing?”. In Is Japan Really Changing Its Ways? Regulatory Reform and the Japanese Economy, eds. Lonny E. Carlile and Mark C. Tilton. Brookings Institution Press: Washington, D.C.
    Colignon, Richard A. and Chikako Usui. 2003. Amakudari: The Hidden Fabric of Japan`s Economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
    Dal Bó, Ernesto. 2006. “Regulatory Capture: A Review.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(2): 203-225.
    Electricity System Reform Expert Subcommittee. 2013. Report of the Electricity System Reform Expert Subcommittee. Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI), Japan.
    Evans, Peter B. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    FEPC (The Federation of Electric Power Company of Japan). 2011. Electricity Review Japan.
    FEPC (The Federation of Electric Power Company of Japan). 2015. Electricity Review Japan.
    Ferguson, Charles D. and Mark Jansson. 2013. Regulating Japanese Nuclear Power in the Wake of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident. United States of America: Federation of American Scientists.
    Goto, Mika and Masayuki Yajima. 2006. “A New Stage of Electricity Liberalization in Japan: Issues and Expectations”. In Electricity Market Reform: An International Perspective, eds. Fereidoon P. Sioshansi and Wolfgang Pfaffenberger. Elsevier: Amsterdam, Boston.
    Greif, Avner and David D. Laitin. 2004. “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change.” American Political Science Review 98(4):633-652.
    Hall, Peter A. and David Soskice. 2001. “Introduction”. In Varieties of Capitalism, eds. Peter Hall and David Soskice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    Hall, Peter A. and Kathleen Thelen. 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism” Socio-Economic Review 7: 7–34.
    Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C. R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms” Political Studies 44(5): 936-957.
    Hayashi, Masatsugu and Larry Hughes. 2012. “The Policy Responses to The Fukushima Nuclear Accident and Their Effect on Japanese Energy Security.” Energy Policy 59: 86-101.
    Johnson, Chalmers A. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Johnson, Chalmers A. 1995. Japan: Who Governs? : The Rise of the Developmental State. New York: W. W. Norton.
    Jones, R. S. and M. Kim. 2013. “Restructuring the Electricity Sector and Promoting Green Growth in Japan”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1069, OECD Publishing.
    Jordana, Jacint and David Levi-Faur. 2004. The Politics of Regulation in the Age of Governance. In The Politics of Regulation: Institutions and Regulatory Reforms for the Age of Governance, eds. Jacint jordana and David Levi-Faur. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK.
    Kagan, Robert A. 2000. “Introduction: Comparing National Style of Regulation in Japan and the United States. Law & Policy 22(3&4): 225-244.
    Kingston, Jeff. 2012. “Japan’s Nuclear Village.” The Asia-Pacific Journal 10(33): No.1.
    Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Jean Tirole. 1991. “The Politics of Government Decision-Making: A Theory of Regulatory Capture.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1089-1127.
    Majone, Giandomenico. 1997. “From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance,” Journal of Public Policy 17(2): 139-167.
    METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, Japan). 2010. The Strategic Energy Plan of Japan.
    METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, Japan). 2015. Japan’s Electricity Market Reform and Beyond.
    METI. 2016. “Statement by Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry Hayashi Full Liberalization of Entry into the Electricity Retail Market.”
    Mizutani, Fumitoshi. 2012. Regulatory Reform of Public Utilities: The Japanese Experience. Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
    Moran, Michael. 2002. “Review Article: Understanding the Regulatory State” British Journal of Political Science 32: 391-413.
    Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics” American Political Science Review 94(2):251-267.
    Polanyi, Karl. [1944] 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
    Samuels, Richard J. 2013. 3.11: Disaster and Change in Japan. Ithaca, New York; London: Cornell University Press.
    Satoko, Onuki. 2011. “Former Fukushima Governor Sato Eisaku Blasts METI-TEPCO Alliance: “Government must accept responsibility for defrauding the people”.” The Asia-Pacific Journal 9(15): No.4.
    Scalise, Paul J. 2012. Hard Choices: Japan’s Post Fukushima Energy Policy in the Twenty-First Century. In Natural Disaster and Nuclear crisis in Japan: Response and Recovery after Japan’s 3/11, ed. Jeff Kingston. New York: Routledge.
    Stigler, George J. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 2-21.
    The National Diet of Japan. The Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission. 2012. The Official Report of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission.
    Thelen, Kathleen. 1999. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369-404.
    Vivoda, Vlado. 2014. Energy security in Japan: challenges after Fukushima. Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
    Vogel, Steven K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
    Vogel, Steven K. 2006. Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry are Reforming Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
    Watanabe, Hiroaki Richard. 2015. “Institutional Change Under Neoliberal Pressure: Japanese Regulatory Reforms in Labor and Financial Markets.” Asian Politics & Policy 7(3): 413-432.
    Weingast, Barry R. 1996. “Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives.” In A New Handbook of Political Science, eds. Robert Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Weiss, Linda. 1998. The Myth of the Powerless State. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    102252021
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102252021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Political Science] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    202101.pdf2127KbAdobe PDF2571View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback