English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50918099      Online Users : 852
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99720


    Title: 多條成長軌跡與非完整資料之研究：SEM與MLM的比較
    Other Titles: The Study of Multiple Growth Trajectories and Unbalanced Data: A Comparison of SEM and MLM
    Authors: 溫福星
    Keywords: 潛在成長模型;線性成長模型;不完整資料;結構方程模式;多層次模式
    atent growth model;linear growth model;unbalanced data;SEM;MLM
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2016-08-08 11:10:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在多層次研究如雨後春筍般的蓬勃發展之後，許多學者紛紛研究兩個研究典範：結構方程模式與多層次模式在多層次橫斷面資料分析上的異同，但較少研究探討追蹤資料成長模型在這兩種方法估計結果上的比較。本研究延伸MacCallum等人的研究，將多條成長軌跡延伸到重複觀測時點誤差項變異數不等的情況下，比較結構方程模式與多層次模式在這樣異質性假設以及不完整資料的估計結果。根據437家公司4年度兩組重複觀測資料在這兩種方法上的分析發現，在成長軌跡上得到相同的參數估計值，且在不完整資料的條件下也獲得相似的結果。此結果顯示追蹤資料的多成長軌跡在異質性假設與遺漏資料條件下，這兩種方法可以說是等價。
    There are many papers to discuss the similarities and differences between SEM and MLM on the cross-sectional research when the multilevel studies are growing. But there is few paper to investigate their differences in the longitudinal studies. In this paper， we extend the research of MacCallum et al to the heterogeneous hypothesis and compare the results of SEM and MLM under the heterogeneity and unbalance data settings. The findings analyzed from the repeated measures of 437 companies show that the estimates from the latent growth model of SEM and the linear growth model of MLM are the same under heterogeneity and their outcomes of the unbalanced data are similar. In other words， SEM and MLM are equivalent under heterogeneity assumption and missing data in the longitudinal study.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 33(4),1-21
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback