Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99676
|
| Title: | 台灣天主教中等學校校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能之關係研究
A Study on the Relationship Among the Principals’ Moral Leadership,School Organization Health, and School Effectiveness in Taiwan Catholic Secondary Schools |
| Authors: | 陳海鵬
Chen, Haiporn |
| Contributors: | 秦夢群
洪煌堯
陳海鵬
Chen, Haiporn |
| Keywords: | 天主教中等學校
道德領導
學校組織健康
學校效能
Catholic secondary school
moral leadership
school organization health
school effectiveness |
| Date: | 2016 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-08-03 11:40:03 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究係對台灣天主教中等學校校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能三個變項進行受訪教職員知覺調查與描述、比較不同背景變項的教職員差異是否顯著、探討校長道德領導、學校組織健康對學校效能相關性及預測性，依據研究所得結論,分別對台灣天主教中等學校董事會、學校當局、教育人員及後續研究者提出建議，以做為推展校長道德領導、精進學校組織健康及提高學校效能之參考。
本研究使用問卷調查法，以t檢訂、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、多元迴歸等統計方法，探討台灣天主教中等學校校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能之關係。
經由文獻的蒐集與探討，提出本研究的研究架構模式圖。研究對象為台灣天主教中等學校435位教職員，研究工具係組合陳浩、秦夢群、蔡玲玲三位各自編寫之「校長道德領導」、「學校組織健康」與「學校效能」問卷。
透過統計分析與討論,本研究獲得以下結論:
一、台灣天主教中等學校教職員知覺校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能之現況屬中高程度。
二、台灣天主教中等學校教職員在人員背景變項對校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能的知覺，大部分未達顯著差異。
三、台灣天主教中等學校校長道德領導、學校組織健康與學校效能三者間具有正向關聯性。
四、台灣天主教中等學校校長道德領導與學校組織健康對學校效能均具有正向預測力。
This study aims to examine the relationship among the principals’ moral leadership, school organization health, and school effectiveness in Taiwan Catholic secondary schools. Through the organization status description, comparison between different teacher background variables, the correlation with the principals’ moral leadership, school organizational health to forecast school effectiveness was discussed. Finally, it proposes suggestions for Taiwan`s Catholic secondary school boards, school authorities, educators and subsequent researchers for further improvement of school effectiveness.
This study uses questionnaires survey, t test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, multiple regression and other statistical methods to explore Taiwan`s Catholic secondary school moral leadership, the organizational health and schools` effectiveness.
Through the collection and discussion of the literature, this study proposes the study frmaework. The questionnaire interviewing 435 Taiwan Catholic secondary school faculties, is developed by the results of moral leadership, school organization and school effectiveness relationship of health from the research of Chen, Qin, and Tsai.
Through statistical analysis and discussion, this study obtains the following conclusions:
1. Taiwan Catholic secondary school staff has medium-to-high perception of moral leadership, organizational status of school health and school performance.
2. Taiwan Catholic secondary school faculty staff’s background variancees show insignificant differences in surveying the principals’ moral leadership of principals, school organization and school effectiveness of health.
3. Taiwan Catholic secondary school moral leadership, school health and school performance of the organizations have a positive correlation.
4. Taiwan Catholic secondary school moral leadership and school organization health have a positive predictive power for the effectiveness of school. |
| Reference: | 一、中文部分
丁文祺 (2008)。國民中學校長教學領導、教師社群互動、教師專業實踐與學校效關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
丁雍哲 (2014)。高雄市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織公民行為與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
王素貞 (2014)。國民小學校長道德領導、教師工作投入與學校效能之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
古芝潔 (2010)。台中縣市國民小學教師感受校長道德領導與教師工作滿意相關之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立臺中教育大學，台中市。
江志正 (2000)。國民小學團體動力、組織學習、學校發展策略與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
江滿堂 (2008)。國民小學校長多元領導型態、團體動力、學校組織文化特質與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
江澈 (2007)。私立高級中學校長競值領導、教師專業承諾、組織創新與組織效能關係之研究－私立高中有效經營模式之建構。(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
何福田 (2004)。校長的孕育。臺北市：國家教育研究院籌備處。
吳明雄 (2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長轉型領導、教師知識管理與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺中教育大學，臺中市。
吳玲瑤 (2011)。國民小學校長道德領導與學校組織健康關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，逢甲大學，台中市。
吳清山 (1991)。學校行政。臺北市：心理。
吳清山 (2002)。學校效能研究。臺北市：五南。
吳清山，林天祐 (2001)。學校效能。教育研究月刊，83，138-139。
吳清山，林天祐 (2005)。教育新辭書。臺北市：高等教育。
李菁菁 (2014)。高級中學校長正向領導、教師職場希望感與學校效能之相關研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立臺南大學，台南市。
周美慧 (2014)。校長多元文化領導策略、教育正義實踐與學校效能之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
周淑婷 (2014)。高雄市國中教師知覺校長道德領導行為與學校組織氣氛及學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
林明地 (1997)。兼重技術性與藝術性角色均衡的領導。人力發展，44，12-22。
林明地 (2002)。校長學:工作分析與角色研究取向。臺北市：五南。
林竺諼 (2009)。國民中學校長道德領導與品德教育推展策略之研究–以台北市為例。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立政治大學，台北市。
林春貴 (2014)。高雄市國中校長教育資源運用、經營策略與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立屏東大學，屏東縣。
林衍伸 (2008)。屏東縣國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
林義良 (2013)。高雄市國民小學校長道德領導與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
姜得勝 (2014)。品格、道德、品德、倫理意涵之釐清。師友月刊，563，50-53。
施翔云 (2010)。國民小學教師知覺校長道德領導、學校組織文化與學校效能之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。
柯嚴賀 (2007)。國民小學團體動力、組織價值、組織創新與學校效能關係之研究－以高雄市為例。(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
洪經綸 (2010)。校長溝通行為與學校效能關係之研究－以台北縣小型國民小學為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
范慶鐘 (2011)。國民小學校長多元架構領導、學校組織健康、教師專業承諾與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
范熾文 (2002)。國小校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織績效之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
徐易男 (2009)。國民小學公共關係、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。
秦夢群 (2000)。學校行政-理論部分。臺北市：五南。
秦夢群 (2005)。教育領導新理論與研究取向之分析。教育研究月刊，136，106-118。
秦夢群 (2009)。國民中學教師彰權益能、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，32(1), 1-28。
秦夢群 (2011)。教育行政理論與模式。臺北市：五南。
秦夢群 (2013)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
秦夢群，吳勁甫 (2006)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與教師組織承諾關係之研究。教育研究集刊，52(3)，141-172。
秦夢群，吳勁甫，鄧鈞文 (2007)。國民中學學校組織健康層面之建構與衡量。教育政策論壇，10(3)，75-102。
秦夢群，吳勁甫，簡瑋成 (2014)。群體層次教師組織公民行為、教師彰權益能與學校效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，37(1)，1-35。
國立編譯館 (2000)。教育大辭書。臺北市：文景。
張明輝 (1999)。企業組織的革新對學校組織再造的啟示。教師天地，98，10-16。
張慶勳 (1996)。國小校長轉化、互易領導影響學校組織文化特性與組織效能之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
梁淑娟 (2007)。國民小學校長道德領導與教師工作投入關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
莊清寶 (2011)。學校本位財務管理、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究：以國中小特色學校為例。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，臺北市。
許德便 (2011)。國民中學校長服務領導、教師教學創新、社群互動與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
郭美辰 (2012)。高職行政主管對校長衝突管理、認同程度及學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立臺北科技大學，臺北市。
陳威良 (2008)。國民小學校長道德領導、學校組織文化與學生學習表現之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
陳昭蓉 (2012)。知識創新、資訊素養、終身學習與學校效能關係之研究--以高屏地區高中職校為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
陳昱騰 (2008)。高雄市國民小學校長道德領導行為與教師組織承諾及工作投入關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
陳浩 (2013)。新北市國民小學校長道德領導、教師組織承諾與 教師組織公民行為關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立政治大學，台北市。
陳維寧 (2011)。國民小學校長轉型領導、教師專業發展與學校效能關係之研究~以原高雄市為例。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學，屏東市。
陳麗卿 (2014)。高雄市國民小學校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
傅如瑛 (2009)。桃園縣國民小學組織氣氛與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學，臺北市。
黃哲彬 (2010)。國民中學校長賦權增能領導行為、組織創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，臺北市。
黃敏榮 (2012)。高級中等學校分布式領導、學校創新經營與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，臺北市。
黃淑貞 (2012)。影響高雄市國小學校效能因素之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)。樹德科技大學，高雄市。
楊世圳 (2014)。高職校長催化領導、團隊凝聚力、團隊決策力及學校效能之相關研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
楊正成 (2013)。高雄市國民小學校長願景領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
楊念湘 (2011)。國民小學校長混合教練、師傅教導與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。
楊明華 (2009)。有關文化的100個素養。臺北市：驛站文化。
楊政家 (2012)。屏東縣國中校長道德領導、學校組織文化與教師工作投入之調查研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立臺東大學，台東縣。
葉宸汝 (2015)。教師知覺校長道德領導與學校效能之研究 －以彰化縣國民小學為例。(未出版之碩士論文)，康寧大學，台南市
劉春榮 (1993)。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，臺北市。
歐用生 (2005)。課程領導的議題與展望。臺北市：高等教育。
潘慧玲 (2006)。教育效能與教育革新。載於謝文全(主編)，教育行政學－理論與案例(頁471-495)。臺北市：五南。
潘慧玲 (1999)。學校效能研究領域之發展。教育研究集刊，43，77-102。
蔡青珍 (2012)。彰化縣國民小學校長道德領導與學校效能相關之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
蔡炳坤 (2007)。高中校長領導行為、教師組織承諾與學校組織效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，台北市。
蔡玲玲 (2104)。私立高中職學校校長分布式領導、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，台北市。
蔡茂森 (2014)。屏東縣國民中學校長道德領導與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立屏東教育大學，屏東縣。
蔡進雄 (2000)。國民中學校長轉型領導、互易領導、學校文化與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
蔡群億 (2012)。雲林縣國民小學校長道德領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立中正大學，嘉義縣。
蔡嘉閔 (2015)。國民中學校長道德領導、學校組織信任與教師組織公民行為關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立新竹教育大學，新竹市。
鄭鈞元 (2013)。幼兒園園長道德領導量表建構之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立臺南大學，台南市。
鄭燕祥 (2001)。學校效能及校本管理發展的機制。臺北：心理。
盧維禎 (2011)。國民中學教師工作壓力、學校組織健康與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立政治大學，台北市。
蕭天輝、周瓊婉、溫源鳳 (2008)。知識管理策略、學校本位管理與學校效能關聯性之探討─以台南市國民小學爲例。明道通識論叢，5，160-186。
賴冠儒 (2013)。國民小學校長道德領導對教師集體效能影響之研究。(未出版之碩士論文)，國立暨南國際大學，南投縣
謝文全 (1998)。道德領導—學校行政領導的另一扇窗。載於林玉體主編跨世紀的教育演變。臺北市：文景。
謝金青 (1997)。國民小學學校效能評鑑指標與權重體系之建構。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，臺北市。
顏士程 (2007)。國民小學組織變革、校長權力基礎運用與學校效能關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
顏童文 (2007)。國民小學組織動態能耐、組織健康氣候與學校創新經營關係之研究。(未出版之博士論文)，國立政治大學，台北市。
鐘秀雪 (2008)。校長道德領導與教師專業倫理之相關研究-以台中縣國小為例。(未出版之碩士論文)，東海大學，台中市。
二、外文部分
Akbaba, S. (1999). Organizational health of the secondary schools in Turkey and changes needs. Paper presented at the annul meeting of American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Barberio, M. (1990). Organizational effectiveness, student alienation, and the high school teacher’s perceived sense of academic freedom. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press
Bateman, C.L. (1999). Relationships among empowerment, organizational health, and principal effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Missouri, Columbia.
Brown, L.I. (2002). Issue in school leadership and school effectiveness: A focus on Trinidad and Tobago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED479291)
Brown, M.E. & Trevino, L.K. (2006).Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.
Brown, M.E., Trevino, L.K., Harrison, D.A. (2005).Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing .Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97,117-134.
Cemaloglu, N. (2007). The relationship between organizational health and bullying that teachers experience in primary schools in Turkey. Educational Research Quarterly, 31(2), P.3-28.
Chapman, J. (1993).Leadership, management, and the effectiveness of schooling: A respose to Mr. Gradgrind.Journal of Educational Administration, 31(4), 4-18.
Cheng, Y.C. (1996).School effectiveness and school based management: A mechanism for development, Washington, DC: The Falmer Press.
Childers, J.H. (1983). Organizational health: How to measure a school’s level of health and take remedial action. Journal of Educational Public Relations, 8(2), 4-7.
Coppola, D.L. (1998). Moral leadership：A proposed theory illustrated by select Catholic secondary school principals. Retrieved November 04, 2004, from： http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9839504
Darling, J.R. (1992).Total Quality Management: The Key Role of Leadership Strategies.Journal of Leadership and Organisation Development, 13 (4), 3-7.
Davis, K. (1986).Human Behaviour at Work, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Easley, J. (2007). Moral school building leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46 (1), 25-38.
Enderle, G.(1987). Some Perspectives of Managerial Ethical Leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 6, 657-663.
Farahbakhsh, S. (2006). Leadership in Educational Administration: Concepts, Theories and Perspectives. Academic Leadership Journal, 4(1), 17-28.
Glickman, C.D. (1995). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach. (3rd ed.), Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Grift, W.J.C., & Houtveen, A.A.M. (2006). Underperformance in primary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(3), 255-273.
Halpin, A.W., Croft, D.B., (1966).Theory and research in administration, New York:The Macmillam Company.
Hederson, C.L., Buehler, A.E., Stein, W.L., Dalton, J.E., Robinson, T.R. & Anfara, V.A. (2005). Organizational health and student achievement in Tennessee middle schools.NASSP Bulletin, 89, 54-75.
Hemphill, J.K. (1949). Situational Factors in Leadership. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University Press.
Herera, R. (2010). Principal leadership and school effectiveness: Perspectives from principals and teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Western Michigan, Michigan.
Herey, P., and Blanchard, K. (1977). Management of Organizational Behaviour: Utilizing Human Resources (3rd ed.) .Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
Herey, P., Blanchard, K. (1988). Management of Organizational Behaviour, Utilizing Human Resources. Fifth edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Hollander, E.P. (1995). Organizational leadership and followership: The role of interpersonal relations. In P. Collett, & A. Furnham (Eds.), Social psychology at work: Essays in honour of Michael Argyle (pp. 69-87). London: Routledge.
Hoy, W.K., & Feldman, J. (1987).Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20,30-38.
Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (1987). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: Random House.
Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J., & Bliss, J.R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260-279.
Hoy W.K., Tarter, C.J., & Kottkamp, R.B. (1991).Open Schools/Healthy Schools: Measuring Organizational Climate, Sage: Corwin Press.
Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C. J., & Wiskowskie, L. (1992). Faculty trust in colleagues: Linking the principal with school effectiveness. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 26(1),38-58.
Hoy W.K., & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers` sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355-372.
Hoy, W.K., & Hannum, J.W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement.Educational Administration Quarterly, 33, 290-311.
Hoy W.K., & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hoy W.K., Smith, P.A., & Sweetland, S.R. (2002). The Development of the Organizational Climate Index for High Schools: Its Measure and Relationship to Faculty Trust. High School Journal, 86(2), 38-50.
Hoy W.K., Smith, P.A., & Sweetland, S.R. (2003). Collective efficacy and achievement in rural schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Hoy W.K., & Miskel, C.G. (2005).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Huon, J. (1997). Ethical leadership: The soul of policy making. In Journal of school Leadership. 7(5),506-520.
Kalhoven, K., Hartog, D.N. and De Hoogh, A.H.B. (2011).Ethical leadership at work (ELW): development and validation of a multidimensional measure. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51-69.
Keys, B., and Case, T. (1990). How to Become an Influential Manager. Academy of Management Executive, November, 38-51.
Koontz, H., and Weihrich, H. (1998). Essential of Management. 5th edition, New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company limited.
Langlois, L., Lapointe, C., Valois, P & de Leeuw, A., (2014). Development and validity of the Ethical Leadership Questionnaire.Journal of Educational Administration, 52(3), 310-331.
Leveine, D.U., & Lezotte, L.W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madsion, WI: National Center for Effective School Research and Development.ERIC (U.S. Dept. of Education) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 330032)
Licata, J.W., & Harper, G.W. (2001). Organizational Health and Robust School Vision. Educational Administration Quarterly. 37(1), 5-26.
Lice, J.W. & Harper, G. W. (1999).Healthy schools, robust schools and academic emphasis as an organizational theme.Journal of Educational Administration, 37(5),n463-475.
Lipham, H. (1974). The Principalship: Foundations and Functions, New York:Harper and Row.
Lovl, C.W. (2009). Principal efficacy: An investigation of school principal`s sense of efficacy and indicators of school effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, Mississippi.
Madaus, G.F., Airasian, P.W., & Kellaghan, T. (1980).School effectiveness a reassessment of the evidence, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Madison, L.A. (2002). The effect of supervisor level of authority and leadership style on elementary school climate and teacher job satisfaction.Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Martin V.M. (2009). The role of Early College High School in P-16 success: A case study of students` perceptions of mission Early College High School effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
McCann, J., & Holt, R. (2009). Ethical leadership and organizations: An analysis of leadership in the manufacturing industry based on the perceived leadership integrity scale. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 211-220.
McGregor, J. (1978). Leadership, New York: Harper & Row.
Mill, M. B. (1969). Planned change and organizational health: Figure and ground. In F. D. Carver & T.J. Sergiovanni (Eds.), Organization and human behavior: Focus on school. (pp. 375-391). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mormore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Levis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988).School matters: The junior years. Somerset, England: Open Books Publishing.
Mory, L., & Rassool, N. (1999).School effectiveness: Fracturing the discourse, London: Falmer.
Nir, A., (2002). School health and its relation to teacher commitment. Planning and Changing, 33(1), 106-126.
Omolade, R.A. (2007). A systems test of effectiveness of elementary schools in Nigeria. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of John`s (New York), School of Education and Human Services, N. J.
Parsons, T. (1967). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In A. W. Halpin (Eds.), Administrative theory in education, (pp.40-72). New York: Macmillan.
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological theory and modern society, New York: Free Press.
Peteson, K.D. (2005). School cultures, school effectiveness, and school leadership. Chung Cheng Educational Studies, 4(s), 63-103.
Purey, S., & Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-452.
Quinn, R.E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29, 363–377.
Rei, K., Hopkins, D., & Holly, P. (1987). Towards the effective school：Basil Black-well. Oxford, England.
Roan, B. (1985). The assessment of school effectiveness. In Reginal, M. J.(Ed), Researching for excellence an effective schools source book .(pp.99-116). Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Saad, R.S. Ab., & Nor, M.M. (2007). Do school leaders need moral leadership to create effective schools? Masalah Pendidikan, 30(2), 137-148.
Sama, L.M., & Shoaf, V. (2008). Ethical leadership for the professions: Fostering a moral community. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 39-46.
Sammons, P., Hillman, J., & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effectiveness schools: a review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED
Sandel, M.L. (2010). Justice: What`s the right thing to do, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Scheerens, J. (2013). The use of theory in school effectiveness research revisited. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 1-38.
Scheerens, J. (2013). What is effective schooling? A review of current thought and practice. Retrieved from http://www.ibo.org/globalassets/ publications/ ib-research / whatiseffectiveschoolingfinal-1.pdf
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
Scheerens, J. (2000). Improving school effectiveness, Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Scheerens, J. (2013).The use of theory in school effectiveness research revisited.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(1), 1-38.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1992).Moral leardership: getting to the heart of school improvement, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Smith, P.A. (2002). The organizational health of high schools and student proficiency in mathematics. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2/3), 98-105.
Smith, P.A., Hoy, W.K., & Sweetland, S. R.(2001).Organizational health of high schools and dimensions of faculty trust.Journal of School Leadership, 11,135-151.
Smith, P.M. (1995). Leadership. In A.S.R. Manstead & M. Hewstone (Eds), the Blackwell Encyclopaedia of social Psychology, (pp.358-362). Oxford: Blackwell.
Stogdill, R.M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of psychology, 25 (1), 35-71.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1993). Effecting school change, The Halton approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 3(1), 19-41.
Swetland, S.R., & Hoy, W.K. (2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5),703-729.
Starratt, R.J. (1991). Building an ethical echool: a theory for practice in educational leadership, Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(2), 185-202.
Tannenbaum, R., Weschler, I.R., and Massarik, F. (1961). Leadership and organization, A Behaviour Science Approach, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Terry, G.R. (1988). Principles of Management, Homewood III: Richard D. Irwin.
Tsi, T.K., & Cheng, Y.C. (1999). School organizational health and teacher commitment: A contingency study with muti-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 249-268.
Wilson, B.L., & Corcoran, T.B. (1988). Successful secondary schools-visions of excellence in American public education. The Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis., Philadelphia.
Wilson, E.M. (2008). A qualitative investigation of how ethics influence urban principal’s practice in school improvement. University of Cincinnati, Ohio. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Woendale, S., & Bastiani, J. (2000). The contribution of parents to school effectiveness, London: David Fulton Publishers.
Wu, R.T.Y.(2005). Relationship between teachers’ teaching effectiveness and school effectiveness in comprehensive high schools in Taiwan, Republic of China. A Paper Presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Conference, (March, 21). Barcelona, Spain.
Yuki, G., and Van Fleet, D.D. (1998). Theory and Research on Leadership in Organizations. In Dunnette, Marvin D. and Hough, Leatta (Eds). Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 147- 197. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
學校行政碩士在職專班
102911003 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102911003 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 100301.pdf | | 2233Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 105 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
