政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99628
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51652664      線上人數 : 661
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99628


    題名: 自然景觀與農地管制如何影響農地價格 ─花蓮縣的個案
    How Natural Landscape and Regulation of Farmland Affect Farmland Price─The Case of Hualien County
    作者: 李至千
    貢獻者: 林子欽
    丁秀吟
    李至千
    關鍵詞: 農地市場
    花蓮縣農地
    農舍
    自然景觀
    農地價格
    Farmland market
    Farmland of Hualien County
    Farmhouse
    Natural landscape
    Farmland price
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2016-08-03 10:21:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　影響農地價格之因素，隨著市場條件之差異，如土地使用管制或農地政策而有所不同。歸納我國過去有關農地價格研究之文獻，對於東部農地市場之研究較少，且鮮少探討自然景觀因素對於農地價格之影響。對於東部農地價格之研究，可能遺漏重要的影響因素。因此本研究探討影響花蓮縣農地價格之因素，且加入自然景觀作為研究變數，以觀察自然景觀對於花蓮縣農地價格之影響。又農業發展條例於民國89年修正後，准許農民在其自有農地興建農舍。故本研究將農地樣本分為得興建農舍及不得興建農舍之農地，進一步比較自然景觀對農地價格之影響於兩者之間有無差異。由於本研究選取之農地，為其興建之農舍皆得作為民宿使用之樣本，因此，本研究加入衡量市場對於民宿需求之變數，探討市場對於民宿之需求，是否加深自然景觀對於農地價格之影響。

    　　本研究以民國101年8月至103年12月花蓮縣非都市農地實價登錄資料作為研究樣本，透過線性迴歸模型，探討包括自然景觀因素在內之各項因素對於花蓮縣農地價格之影響。實證結果觀察到：對於花蓮縣農地市場，農地是否得興建農舍為自然景觀是否會影響農地價格之主因，且自然景觀對於農地價格之影響，受到市場對於民宿之需求而有所差異。基於上述，本研究研究結論如下：一、自然景觀因素影響花蓮「得興建農舍」之農地價格，但不影響「不得興建農舍」之農地價格。二、農舍作為民宿使用機率變高時，將加深自然景觀之價格效果。
    Factors that affect the price of the farmland vary in different market conditions, such as land use regulation or farmland policy. Previous studies on farmland prices is found to have paid little attention to farmland market in eastern Taiwan, and rarely discuss the amenity of natural landscape that might also affect the price of farmland. Lack of studies may lead to ignore the important factors of farmland price in eastern Taiwan. This study discusses the factors that affect the price of farmland in Hualien County, and adds the natural landscape as the independent variables so as to observe how natural landscape affect the farmland price in Hualien County. After Agricultural Development Act amended in 2000, farmers are allowed to construct individual farmhouses on their own farmland. Therefore, we split the data into farmland in which construction of farmhouse is allowed and farmland otherwise. Furthermore, we compare the difference between two types of farmland. Because the farmland where the farmhouses are allowed to construct are also permitted to operate the Bed and Breakfast, we also add the independent variables of the market demand for the Bed and Breakfast. In so doing, we are able to investigate whether the market demand for the Bed and Breakfast increases the natural landscape that affect the price of farmland.

    We choose the non-urban farmland price registration data from August 2012 to December 2014 in Hualien County. The linear regression model is used to analyze how various factors including natural landscape affect the farmland price in Hualien County. Based on the empirical results, three conclusions are arrived at below: First, factors of natural landscape only affect the price of farmland which allow for construction of farmhouses, but not affect the price of farmland where construction of farmhouses are forbidden. Second, farmhouses that are permitted to operate the Bed and Breakfast will increase the price effect of natural landscape.
    參考文獻: 中文參考文獻
    1.吳功顯，2007，「農地價格之組成及其影響因素之探討」，『華岡農科學報』，20:1-30。
    2.李選卿、蕭承德與謝振環，2013，『計量經濟學』初版，臺北市：東華書局。
    3.林子欽，2007，「農地移轉價格對農地所有權流通與農地利用影響之研究」，行政院農業委員會科技計畫研究報告。
    4.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994，「臺灣農地價格時間序列資料之編製與分析」，『臺灣土地金融季刊』，31（1）：75-97。
    5.梁仁旭、陳奉瑤，2014，『不動產估價』第三版，臺北市：財團法人中國地政研究所。
    6.梁維真，2015，「臺灣農地法拍價格之決定因素」，國立政治大學碩士論文：台北
    7.黃美娟，2007，「土地面積與價格關係之研究」，國立政治大學地政系碩士論文。
    8.黃炳文，2005，農地興建農舍的課題與調整方向，『農業世界』，278：93-97。
    9.楊佩欣，2007，「住商混合使用對房價之影響─台北市經驗」，國立政治大學碩士論文。
    10.劉健哲、黃炳文，2004，「農地管理政策與興建舍問題之研究」，『社經法制論叢』，34：305-336。
    11.劉健哲、黃炳文，2005，農地管理政策與農地興建農舍問題之研究，『經社法治叢論』，34：305-336
    12.趙蕙萍，1992，「臺灣農地價格之研究」，臺灣大學農業經濟系碩士論文。

    英文參考文獻
    1.Alston,J.M., 1986,“An Analysis of Growth of U.S. Farmland Prices”,1963–82,American Journal of Agricultural Economics,68（1）:1-9.
    2.Brown,G.M., and Pollakowski, H.O., 1977,”Economic Valuation of Shoreline”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(3)：272–278.
    3.Benson,E.D.,Hansen,J.L.,Schwertz,A.L., and Smersh,G.T.,1998,” Pricing Residential Amenities：The Value of a View”, Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,16(1)：55-73.
    4.Bond,M.T., Seiler,V.L., and Seiler,M.J.,2002,” Residential Real Estate Prices：a Room With a View”, Journal of Real Estate Research,23(1-2)：129-138.
    5.Boris, P.,Yakov,O., and Larissa,F.,2005,” Factors Affecting Housing Modifications and Housing Pricing: A Case Study of Four Residential Neighborhoods in Haifa, Israel”, Journal of Real Estate Research,27(4)：371-407.
    6.Boxall,P.C., Chan,W.H., and McMillan,M.L.,2005,”The Impact of Oil and Natural Gas Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values: a Spatial Hedonic Analysis”, Resource and Energy Economics,27(3)：248–269.
    7.Beron,K.,Murdoch,J., and Thayer,M.,2001,”The Benefit Visibility Improvement: New Evidence From The Los Angeles Metropolitan Area”, J. Real Estate Finance Econ,22(2)：319–337.
    8.Chicoine,D.L., 1981,” Farmland Values at The Urban Fringe：An Analysis of Sale Prices”, Land Economics,57(3)：353-362.
    9.Correll,M.R., Lillydahl, J.H. and Singell,L.D.,1978,”The Effects of Greenbelts on Residential Property Values：Some Findings on the Political Economy of Open Space”, Land Economics,54(2),207-217.
    10.Cheshire, P.C. and Sheppard,S.,2002,”Welfare Economics of Land Use Regulation”, Journal of Urban Economics,52：242–269.
    11.Cassel, E.,Mendelsohn,R.,1985,”The choice of functional forms for hedonic price equations: comment”, J. Urban Econ.,18(2)：135–142.
    12.Drescher,K.,Henderson,J., and McNamara,K.,2001,” Farmland Prices Determinants”, American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting,Chicago,Illinois,Auguest5-8,2001.
    13.David Maddison,2000,” A Hedonic Analysis of Agricultural Land Prices in England and Wales”, European Review of Agricultural Economics,27(4)：519-532.
    14.Darling,A.H., 1973,”Measuring Benefits Generated by Urban Water Parks”, Land Economics,49(1)：22-34.
    15.Fennema,A.T.,Veeneklaas,F.R.,Vreke,J.,1996,”Meerwaarde Woningen Door Nabijheid Nan Groen (Surplus Value of Dwellings in The Vicinity of Green Areas)”,Stedebouw en Ruimtelijke Ordening,77(3)：33-35.
    16.Gibbons, S., Mourato, S., and Resende,G.,2011,” The Amenity Value of English Nature：A Hedonic Price Approach”, Environmental and Resource Economics,57(2)：175-196.
    17.Garrod,G.D., and Willis, K.G.,1992,”The Environmental Economic Impact of Woodland: A Two State Hedonic Price Model of The Amenity Value of Forestry in Britain”, Applied Economics,24(7)：715-728.
    18.Gatto, M., De Leo,G.A.,2000,”Pricing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: The Neverending Story”, Bioscience 50：347–355.
    19. Gujarati, D. N, 2003, Basic Econometrics.4th Edition, McGraw-Hill International Edition.
    20.Huang,H.,Miller,G.Y.,Sherrick,B.J., and Gomez,M.I.,2006, “Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88（2）458-470.
    21. Jacqueline M. Hamilton, 2007,”Coastal Landscape and The Hedonic Price of Accommodation”, Ecological Economics,62(5)：594-602.
    22.Jim,C.Y. and Wendy, Y.C., 2009,” Value of Scenic Views：Hedonic Assessment of Private Housing in Hong Kong”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91(4)：226-234.
    23.Jim,C.Y. and Wendy, Y.C., 2007,”Consumption Preferences and Environmental Externalities: a Hedonic Analysis of The Housing Market in Guangzhou”, Geoforum,38(2)：414-431.
    24.Kask, S.B.,Maani,A.,1992,”Uncertainty,Information and Hedonic Pricing”, Land Economics,68(2)：170–184.
    25.Kulshreshtha, S.N., and Gillies,J.A.,1993,”Economic Evaluation of Aesthetic Amenities: A Case Study of River View”, Water Resources Bulletin,29(2): 257–266.
    26.Livanis,G.,Moss,C.B.,Breneman,V.E.,and Nehring,R.F.,2006,” Urban Sprawl And Farmland Prices”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics,88(4),915-929.
    27.Lutzenhiser,Margot, and Netusil, N.R., 2001,”The Effect of Open Spaces on a Home`s Sale Price”, Contemporary Economic Policy,19(3)：291–298.
    28.Luttik,J.,2000,” The Value of Trees, Water and Open Space as Reflected by House Prices in The Netherlands”, Landscape and Urban Planning,48(3-4)：161-167.
    29.Lake,I.R.,Andrew A. Lovett, Ian J. Bateman, and Brett H.Day.,2000, “Using GIS and Large-Scale Digital Data to Implement Hedonic Pricing Studies”, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14(6)：521–541.
    30.Leggett, C.G.,Bockstael,N.E.,2000,”Evidence of The Effects of Water Quality on Residential Land Prices”, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 39(2)：121–144.
    31.Malpezzi, S,2002 , ”Hedonic Pricing Models: A Selective and Applied Review” , The Center for Urban Land Economics Research, 20-21.
    32.Moss,C.B., 1997,“Returns, Interest Rates, and Inflation：How They Explain Changes in Agricultural land Values”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5)：1311-1318.
    33.McLeod,P.B., 1984,”The Demand for Local Amenity: An Hedonic Price Analysis”, Environment and Planning A, 16 (3)：389–400.
    34.Plattner,R.H., and Campbell, T.J.,1978,”A Study of the Effect of Water View on Site Value”, Appraisal Journal, 46 (1)：20-25.
    35.Paterson, R.W., and Boyle,K.J.,2002,”Out of Sight, Out of Mind? Using GIS to Incorporate Visibility in Hedonic Property Value Models”, Land Economics,78(3)：417-425.
    36.Rodriguez, M., and Sirmans, C.F.,1994,”Quantifying the Value of a View in Single-Family Housing Markets”, Appraisal Journal,62(4)：600-603.
    37.Rosen, S.,1974,”Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition”, J. Polit. Economy,82(1)：34–55.
    38.Stewart,P.A. and Libby, L.W., 1998,“Determinants of Farm Land Value：The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois”, Review of Agricultural Economics,20(1): 80-95.
    39.Tyrvainen, L.,1997,”The Amenity Value of the Urban Forest: An Application of the Hedonic Pricing Method”, Landscape and Urban Planning,37(3-4)：211–222.
    40.Tyrvainen, L., and Antti,M.,2000,”Property Prices and Urban Forest Amenities”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39(2)：205–23.
    41.Thorsnes, P.,2002,”The Value of a Suburban Forest Preserve: Estimates from Sales of Vacant Residential Building Lots”, Land Economics,78(3)：426–441.

    網頁參考文獻
    1.遠見雜誌，104年10月25，「六大亂象難遏止，台灣快沒耕地可用！」，2015年8月號：http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_29205.html。
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    103257024
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103257024
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[地政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    702401.pdf1112KbAdobe PDF2232檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋