政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99511
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51265001      線上人數 : 845
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99511


    題名: 遊戲設計背後之電腦輔助語言教學教師思維:一位高中英文老師的個案研究
    CALL Teacher Cognition Behind Game-based Language Instruction: A Case Study on a High School English Teacher
    作者: 林世恩
    Lin, Shih En
    貢獻者: 招靜琪
    Chao, Chin Chi
    林世恩
    Lin, Shih En
    關鍵詞: 教師認知
    電腦輔助語言教學
    遊戲
    教師自主
    Teacher cognition
    Computer-Assisted Language Learning
    Game
    Teacher autonomy
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2016-08-02 15:42:48 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 教師思維一向被認為與教師的實際教學有重要的關聯。本個案研究探討一位現職語言教師設計的行動學習活動背後之教師思維，以期更深入了解此行動學習活動之設計，並為電腦輔助語言教學師資培育之設計提供新的思維與洞察。
    本個案研究為質性研究。研究工具包括受訪教師對於此活動的公開分享、半結構式訪談、文件收集及與學生的非正式談話。在訪談中，個案詳述了她的課室教學及其他經驗，包括過往的學習、專業教師訓練及其在不同場域的經歷。這些資料則進一步透過Borg (2006)和Mishra & Koehler (2006) 提供的架構(分別為教師思維框架及TPACK架構圖)進行討論。此研究首先詳細說明此行動學習活動中的九個關卡及其中教師表現出的各項知識。接著從過往學習經驗、專業教師訓練及不同場域等角度去追溯教師思維的形成。此研究並藉此進一步討論將上述兩個架構融合、調整的可能性以及電腦融入語言教學師資培育課程設計的新思維。
    研究結果顯示，以上兩個架構皆未含括與教師本身或教師自主有關之元素，而這些元素在此個案研究中皆扮演教師思維和相應教學活動成形之關鍵角色。此外，研究結果也顯示，Mishra & Koehler (2006)的TPACK中涵蓋的各種元素可能有不同的權重，進而彰顯此框架在應用上有更複雜的潛力。此個案研究期能提供更多思維及啟發給對於科技融入教學，或電腦融入語言教學師資培育課程設計有興趣者。
    Teacher cognition has been regarded to have strong connections with teachers` teaching practices. The case study intends to investigate a practicing language teacher`s cognition behind her mobile-learning activity, an outdoor scavenger hunt activity with multiple missions. The main purpose of this study is to explore how the activity was designed and to further provide insights into CALL teacher education.
    This is a qualitative study and data were collected through the participant`s presentation about the activity, two semi-structured interviews, documentation and informal talks with students. In the semi-structured interviews, the participant detailed her classroom practices and other related experiences, including past learning experiences, professional development and her experiences in other contexts. The participant`s experiences were then reconstructed and analyzed with Borg (2006) and Mishra & Koehler (2006) as the frameworks. The study first detailed the nine missions included in the participant’s scavenger hunt activity and analyzed the teacher`s knowledge shown in the activity. Then, the formation of the teacher`s cognitions was traced mainly in three aspects: past schooling, professional coursework and classroom practices under various contexts. Finally, the revised, integrated framework and some insights into CALL teacher education were discussed.
    The result showed that the frameworks are lacking elements related to teachers themselves and teacher autonomy, both of which serve as a premise in the complex interaction of the elements in teacher cognitions and the resulting classroom practices. Other than that, it was found that the elements in the framework provided by Mishra & Koehler (2006) might carry different weights, which indicated more complexity in the framework. It is expected that those who are interested in technology integration into language teaching or CALL teacher education will find this study insightful and inspiring.
    參考文獻: Bailey, K. M., B. Bergthold, B. Braunstein, N. Jagodzinski Fleischman, M. P. Holbrook, J. Tuman, X. Waissbluth & L. J. Zambo(1996). The language learners’ autobiography: examining the “apprenticeship of observation”. In D. Freeman & J. C. Richards
    (Eds.), Teacher Learning in Language Teaching (pp. 11−29). New York: Cambridge
    University Press
    Borg, S. (1998c). Teachers’ pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative
    study. TESOL Quarterly, 32 (1), 9−38.
    Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.
    Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. New
    York: Continuum
    Chiu, Y. H., Kao, C. W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2012). The relative effectiveness of digital
    game‐based learning types in English as a foreign language setting: A meta‐analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 104-107.
    Chiu, Y. H. (2013). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(2).
    Cochran, K. F. (1991). Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Tentative Model for Teacher Preparation.
    Delcloque, P. (2000). The history of CALL web exhibition. Retrieved from http://www.eurocall-languages.org/resources/history_of_call.pdf
    Duarte, I. B. (1998). Research in Second Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 617-622.
    Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 108-126.
    Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration?. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 25-39.
    Garrett, N. (2009). Technology in the Service of Language Learning: Trends and Issues. Modern Language Journal, 93697-718. doi:
    10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00968.x
    Galloway, J. P. (1997). How teachers use and learn to use computers. In Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 1997, 857-859
    Gerring, J. (2004). What is a case study and what is it good for?. American political
    science review, 98(02), 341-354.
    Gerrish, M. (2011). Scavenger Hunts Encourage Learning. Teaching Young Children, 4(4), 21-23.
    Garber‐Miller, K. (2006). Playful textbook previews: Letting go of familiar mustache
    monologues. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(4), 284-288.
    Genc, Z. S. (2010). Teacher autonomy through reflective journals among teachers of English as a foreign language in Turkey. Teacher Development,14(3), 397-409.
    Hwang, G. J., & Wu, P. H. (2012). Advancements and trends in digital game‐based
    learning research: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to
    2010. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 6-10. doi:
    10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01242.x.
    Johnston, B., & Goettsch, K. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language
    teaching: Explanations by experienced teachers. Canadian Modern Language
    Review, 56(3), 437-468.
    Kessler, G. (2006). Assessing CALL teacher training: What are we doing and what could we do better. Teacher education in CALL, 23-42.
    Kinzie, M. B., & Joseph, D. R. (2008). Gender differences in game activity preferences of middle school children: implications for educational game design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5-6), 643-663.
    Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model.
    The Internet and higher education, 8(1), 13-24.
    Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Contemporary Issues In Technology & Teacher Education, 9(1), 60-70.
    Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? Journal Of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
    Liang, J. C., Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Yang, C. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Surveying in-service preschool teachers` technological pedagogical content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4).
    Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Record,108(6), 1017-1054.
    McGrath, I. (2000) Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp.100-110). London: Longman.
    McCain, C. (2007). Scavenger hunt assignments in academic libraries: viewpoints versus reality. College & Undergraduate Libraries, 14(1), 19-31.
    Northrup, P. T., & Little, W. (1996). Establishing instructional technology benchmarks for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education,47(3), 213-22.
    Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A. (2012). Constraints on Language Teacher Autonomy: A Grounded Theory. TESL Reporter, 45(1), 37-55.
    Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism. Educational research quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
    Robb, T. (2006). Helping teachers to help themselves. Teacher education in CALL, 335-347.
    Ramashova, G. N., Toleuova, T. S., & Saugabay, A. Z. (2011). Teacher autonomy as the factor of professional development in foreign language teaching. Education and Science Without Borders,2(3), 81.
    Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development
    and validation of an assessment instrument for pre-service teachers. Journal of
    Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123-149.
    Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum inquiry, 13(3), 239-265.
    Smith, R. C. (2001). Teacher education for teacher-learner autonomy. Language in language teacher education.
    Thompson, A. D., & Mishra, P. (2007). Breaking news: TPCK becomes TPACK!. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(2), 38.
    Yip, F. W., & Kwan, A. C. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational media international,43(3), 233-249.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    英國語文學系
    101551017
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101551017
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    101701.pdf8242KbAdobe PDF2172檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋