English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50998044      Online Users : 829
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99506


    Title: 混合研究法與中國研究:結合多類案例與量化內容分析
    Authors: 周嘉辰
    Keywords: 混合研究法;中國研究;勞動政策制定;年鑑
    Mixed Methods;China Studies;Labor Policy-making;earbooks
    Date: 2015-06
    Issue Date: 2016-07-25 14:52:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在社會科學研究裡,愈來愈多的學者嘗試將量化與質性研究結合起來。對於中國大陸研究社群而言,儘管案例研究仍然是最常見的選擇,許多學者已經開始嘗試使用混合研究法。目前,最常見的混合研究是結合社會調查與田野訪問。一方面,社會調查有助於將田野調查的結果普遍化;另一方面,深入的質性研究則可以幫助社會調查找到被忽視的變項。然而,如果我們的研究目標在於瞭解較高階層的官員的行為,很顯然地,社會調查並不容易實現。本文以中國大陸勞動政策的制定過程為例,探討如何利用政府規範性文件與官方年鑑等資料,以對其進行量化內容分析。與此同時,在個案研究方面,本文以多類案例研究的標準進行質性研究,以避免少數案例研究中經常出現的選擇偏差問題。根據此二種研究方法,本文提出一個針對高階政治進行混合研究的可能性。
    Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods has been increasingly popular in political science. In studying Chinese politics, while small-N study is still the most common choice in the field, many scholars have started to utilize “mixed methods” in their projects. Perhaps the most prevalent attempt to combine the two kinds of methodology is to integrate survey and fieldwork methods. Surveys are thought to contribute to fieldworks with respect to generalizability of results, and qualitative methods can aid survey works through identification of omitted variables. What if our research is targeted at higher-level officials? Apparently survey methods are not very suitable for this type of study. To illustrate the possibility of employing mixed methods in analyzing Chinese “high politics,” I use a study on labor policy-making as an example to illustrate ways in which multiple methods are combined in a project. Particular attention is paid to adopting a diverse case study design for qualitative purposes, and a content analysis is approached to quantify official yearbooks and government regulations.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 58(2), 61-90
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    58-2(61-90).pdf1264KbAdobe PDF2495View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback