English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799164      Online Users : 450
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99446


    Title: 人力錄取管道與組織承諾及工作滿意度相關性之分析:以臺北市區公所為例
    Analysis of Correlation between Recruiting Channels, Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction: A Case Study of Taipei District Offices
    Authors: 黃錦盛
    Contributors: 蘇偉業
    黃錦盛
    Keywords: 進用管道
    組織承諾
    工作滿意度
    限制轉調
    綁約
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-21 10:41:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年,員工離職率在臺北市政府各類機關當中,區公所名列第三名。為補足人力,區公所乃以三種不同進用管道(高普初考、地方特考、外補商調)來解決用人上的窘境。為防止考試錄取人員分發後頻繁的轉調,造成機關用人困難,考選部乃設計限制轉調機制(即俗稱綁約)。目前高普初考試綁約3年,地方特考綁約6年,對機關組織來說,不同來源的人力錄取管道,其在組織上所呈現之行為影響,究竟會帶來什麼樣的效果,即為為本研究主要探究的面向。
      本研究試圖探討上述三種不同進用管道與組織承諾及工作滿意度之間的關係,透過目前相關文獻的分析,及採用問卷調查法,針對臺北市12個區公所的非主管人員進行調查,歸納出研究結果並提出相關建議,供未來政策修訂及後續研究之參考。
      本研究發現,外補商調人員在組織承諾及工作滿意度皆顯著高於考試分發人員,而考試分發人員不論綁約期滿與否,組織承諾與工作滿意度皆沒有顯著差異,這表示綁約並不能強化錄取者的組織承諾及工作滿意。此外,縱然地方特考錄取者之轉調限制較長,但這些錄取者多傾向持續報考綁約較短之高普初考試,以脫離綁約較長的束縛,故地方特考留才意義不大。
      故本研究建議將高普初考及地方特考之限制轉調年限及限制內容調整成一致,以減少考生錄取後再報考綁約較少的高普考試,及頻繁的跳槽更換機關。亦建議改進考試的分發制度,以遴選代替分發,使考生及用人機關能各取其需要。而對於年齡稍長者善用激勵方式,賦予重任開創雙贏局面。

    關鍵字:進用管道、組織承諾、工作滿意度、限制轉調、綁約
    Recently, the turnover rate of the district offices were ranked as third among all kinds of agencies under Taipei City Government. To solve the recruitment problems, there are three recruiting channels available for the district offices (i.e., general civil service examinations, special examination for local governments, and interagency transfer). To prevent the recruits from transferring to other agencies right after the assumption of their new positions, the Ministry of Examination imposes transfer restrictions on all new recruits (so-called employment contract). The restriction for those recruits from the general examinations is three years; the restriction for those recruits from the special examination for local governments is for six years.
    This study aims to examine the correlation between the three recruiting channels, and organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Through reviewing the literature concerned and a questionnaire survey of the rank-and-file staff of 12 district offices in Taipei City, this study attempts to find the answers and offers suggestions to serve as the reference for policymaking and future studies.
    According to the findings, the staff recruited from other agencies (i.e., interagency transfer) has higher level of organizational commitment and job satisfaction than the new recruits from examinations. And no matter whether the transfer restriction expires or not, the recruits from all examinations show no significant difference in terms of organizational commitment and job satisfaction. This could be interpreted that organizational commitment and job satisfaction cannot be enhanced by the restriction. Moreover, most of the recruits from special examination for local governments who are subject to a six-year transfer restriction tend to take general civil service examinations in order to get rid of a longer restriction. Therefore, the special examination for local governments may not be an effective way to retain the workforce.
    Based on the findings, the study suggests that the same transfer restriction should be applied to the recruits from the general examinations and special examination for local governments, by which the new recruit would less likely to take the general examinations and thus the frequency of staff transfer can be reduced. In addition, the study further suggests modifying the job assignment system. By replacing assignment with selection, the needs of both examinees and agencies may be mutually satisfied. Furthermore, to make a win-win situation, government agencies may motivate senior staff by assigning them important tasks.
    Key words: recruiting channel, organizational commitment, job satisfaction, transfer restrictions, employment contract
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王豫萱、胡昌亞(2013)。再探組織認同之本質:2002-2012之研究回顧與前瞻。人力資源管理學報,13(4),107-137。
    王宜安(2008)。中天新聞部員工認知之領導型態、工作滿意度與組織公民行為之關聯性研究。銘傳大學傳播管理研究所在職專班碩士學位論文,未出版,臺北。
    周威廷(2016)。策略性人力資源管理,地方e中心,2016年3月25日,取自:https://elearning.rad.gov.tw/moodle/file.php/4369/erdata/scol1c1d15m1ch2t3s6i0mp0p0q0qp0.htm。
    吳明隆(2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。台北:易習圖書。
    林美戀(2013)。員工工作滿足與組織承諾之研究-以新北市區公所組織變革為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北。
    林俊傑(2007)。組織承諾的理論與相關研究之探討,學校行政雙月刊,51,31-53。
    林慧秋(2006)。組織承諾與工作滿意對員工知覺服務品質影響之研究-以休閒健身俱樂部為例,南亞學報,21,305-320。
    林淑芬(2007)。地方人事甄補制度績效之研究-以屏東縣地方特考人員考績為例。東海大學政治系碩士論文,未出版,臺中。
    邱皓政(2012)。因素分析。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(編),社會及行為科學研究法 (三):資料分析(1-40頁)。臺北市:東華。
    施能傑(2003)。公務人員考選制度的評估。台灣政治學刊,7(1),157-207。
    施能傑、曹瑞泰、蔡秀涓(2009)。美國、英國和日本中央政府初任文官的甄補制度介紹。國家菁英季刊,5(1),13-34。
    徐正光(1978)。工廠青年工人的工作滿足。社會變遷中的青少年問題研討會論文專集專刊,24,199-213。
    黃家齊、李雅婷、趙慕芬(譯)(2014),組織行為學(15版)(Stephen P. Robbins  Timothy A. Judge原著)。臺北市:華泰。
    黃國敏、張筵儀、郭子醇(2014)。特種考試地方政府公務人員考試制度改革之研究。未出版,考試院。
    董保城(2013)。考試院102年8月15日第11屆第249次會議,2016年5月25日,取自:http://wwwc.moex.gov.tw/main/news/wfrmNews.aspx?kind=3&menu_id=42&news_id=1559
    葉穎蓉(2004)。由心理契約檢視員工工作身份對工作態度與行為的影響-公部門的約聘人員為例。人力資源管理學報,4(4),105-129。
    詹中原(2011)。中華民國發展史撰寫計畫 考詮制度,2015年10月10日,取自: http://hc.nccu.edu.tw/public/view.php?main=2&sub=18&ssub=62&id=269。
    蔡坤宏(2000)。組織承諾、工作滿意與離職意圖的關係:Meta分析。中華管理評論,3(4),33-44。
    鄭伯壎、姜定字、鄭弘岳(2003)。組織行為研究在台灣三十年回顧與展望。臺北:桂冠。
    劉世南(2003)。組織行為再定義與新典範:西方的回顧與展望。應用心理研究,20,139-180。
    劉性仁(2005)。中國歷代選制度與考試權之發展。臺北市:時英。
    劉祥得、翁興利(2007)。當前我國公務人員工作滿意度、工作屬性、工作系絡之因果分析。公共行政學報,(22),71-110。
    關中(2010)。文官向上提升,國家邁向卓越。T&D 飛訊。108,1-7。
    蘇偉業、黎世輝(2011)。為什麼初任公務人員職位配置採用「分發」制度?一個歷史回顧分析。行政暨政策學報。53,25-64。
    蘇偉業(2012)。政府契約人力之政策定位與現實:政府內部人力市場之啟示。文官制度季刊。4(1),35-59。
    蘇偉業、葉上葆(2012)。政務、常務及契約用人三元體系下政府彈用人之研究。臺北:考試院。
    羅清俊(2011)。社會科學研究法-打開天窗說量化(二版)。新北市:威仕曼。

    二、外文部份
    Angle, H. L. and Perry, J. L. (1981). An empiric assessment of organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26,1-14.
    Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Dormann, C. and Zepf, D. (2001). Job satisfaction: a meta-analysis of stabilities. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5),483-504.
    Glisson, C. and Durickm, M. (1988). Predictors of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Human Resource Organizations. Administrative Quarterly, 33,61-81.
    Judge, T. A. et al. (2001). The job Satisfaction-Job Performance Relationship: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Psychological Bulletin.376-407.
    Meyer. J. P. and Allen. N. J. (1991). A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Human Resource Management Review,1(1),61-89.
    Meyer, J. P. et al. (1989). Organizational Commitment and Job Performance:It’s the Nature of the Commitment That Counts. Journal of Applied Psychology,74(1),152-156.
    Michael, P. and Donna, M. (1999). Perceived Organisational Support, Satisfaction with Rewards, and Employee Job Involvement and Organisational Commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review,48(2),197-209.
    Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept Redundancy in Organizational Research: The Case of Work Commitment. The Academy of Management Review, 8(3),486-500.
    Steers, R. M. (1977). Antecedents and Outcomes of Organization Commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22,46-56.
    Tett, R. P. and Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job Satisfaciont, Organizational Commitment, Turnover Intention, and Turnover: Path Analyses Based on Meta-analytic Findings. Personnel Psychology. 46(2),259-290.
    Virtanen, T. (2000). Flexibility, Commitment and Performance. In Farnham, David and Horton, Sylvia (Ed.), Human resources flexibilities in the public services : international perspectives (pp. 39-58), Basingstoke, Hampshire [U.K.] : Macmillan
    Weiss, D. J. et al. (1967). Manual for Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Washington, D.C. :Work Adjustment Project Industrial Relations Center University of Minnesota.
    Wiener, Y. (1982). Commitment in Organization: A Normative View. Academy of Management Review, 7,418-428.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    行政管理碩士學程
    102921018
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1029210181
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    018101.pdf2353KbAdobe PDF2120View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback