政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99413

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99413

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51077741 Online Users : 943

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Science > Department of Psychology > Theses > Item 140.119/99413

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99413

Title:	形成性潛在變項於非線性效果之模型設定 : 限制式方法 Model Specification for Nonlinear Effects of Formative Latent Variables: The Constrained Approach
Authors:	陳淑萍 Chen, Shu Ping
Contributors:	鄭中平 Cheng, Chung Ping 陳淑萍 Chen, Shu Ping
Keywords:	形成性潛在變項潛在非線性效果限制式方法 formatively-measured latent variables latent nonlinear effects the constrained approach
Date:	2016
Issue Date:	2016-07-21 09:54:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	社會行為科學領域中，潛在非線性關係常為研究者所關切，發展潛在變項間非線性效果方法有其重要性。近年來，已有許多統計方法致力於非線性結構方程模型之估計。就作者所知，大多數方法主要侷限在以反映性測量模式 (reflective measurement model) 為基礎之潛在非線性效果估計，而忽略以形成性測量模式 (formative measurement model) 為基礎之潛在非線性效果估計。本研究衍生Chen與Cheng (2014) 於反映性測量模式基礎下所建立的非線性效果方法，拓展至以形成性測量模式為基礎之非線性效果方法。本研究建立的六個廣義性非線性架構，可獨立或同時嵌入三種類型非線性效果，包含反映性潛在變項間交互作用與二次項效果、形成性潛在變項間交互作用與二次項效果和反映性與形成性潛在變項間交互作用效果。值得注意地，每個非線性架構皆保有Chen與Cheng矩陣分割技術，可簡化模型設定的過程，並類推至更多情境的非線性模型。整體來說，本研究促進限制式方法與交乘項指標方法的發展，希冀提升方法發展與研究者在實務研究的應用。 Modeling latent nonlinear effects is a significant issue in the social and behavioral sciences. A variety of approaches have recently been developed for the estimation of nonlinear structural equation modeling. To the best of our knowledge most of these approaches have been developed primarily to estimate interaction and/or quadratic effects of reflectively-measured latent variables, while leaving nonlinear effects of formatively-measured latent variables unaccounted for. The current study implements formatively-measured latent variables into Jöreskog and Yang’s (1996) constrained approach by extending Chen and Cheng’s (2014) research to create a unified set of six generalized nonlinear frameworks, each capable of differentially or collectively modeling the three types of latent nonlinear effects that have arisen in empirical applications (i.e., interaction and/or quadratic effects between reflective latent variables, between formative latent variables, and between reflective and formative latent variables). By preserving the inherent advantage of Chen and Cheng, i.e., the matrix partitioning technique, while at the same time further generalizing its applicability, it is expected that the current framework enhances the potential usefulness of the constrained approach as well as the entire class of product indicator approaches.
Reference:	Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Algina, J., & Moulder, B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 40-52. doi: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0801_3 Arminger, G., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63, 271-300. doi: 10.1007/BF02294856 Bagozzi, R. P. (2011). Measurement and meaning in information systems and organizational research: Methodological and philosophical foundations. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 261-292. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Bagozzi, R. P., Moore, D. J., & Leone, L. (2004). Self-control and the self-regulation of dieting decisions: The role of prefactual attitudes, subjective norms, and resistance to temptation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 199-213. doi: 10.1080/01973533.2004.9646405 Bauer, D. J. (2005). A semiparametric approach to modeling nonlinear relations among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12, 513-535. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1204_1 Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Bollen, K. A. (2011). Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 359-372. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Bollen, K. A., & Bauldry, S. (2011). Three Cs in measurement models: Causal indicators, composite indicators, and covariates. Psychological Methods, 16, 265-284. doi: 10.1037/a0024448 Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009a). Causal indicator models: Identification, estimation, and testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 498-522. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008253 Bollen, K. A., & Davis, W. R. (2009b). Two rules of identification for structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 523-536. doi: 10.1080/10705510903008261 Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305-314. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 Bollen, K. A., & Noble, M. D. (2011). Structural equation models and the quantification of behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 15639-15646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010661108 Bollen, K. A., & Ting, K.-f. (2000). A tetrad test for causal indicators. Psychological Methods, 5, 3-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.1.3 Brandt, H., Kelava, A., & Klein, A. (2014). A simulation study comparing recent approaches for the estimation of nonlinear effects in SEM under the condition of nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 181-195. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.882660 Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Camminatiello, I., Paletta, A., & Speziale, M. T. (2012). The effects of school-based management and standards-based accountability on student achievement: Evidence from PISA 2006. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 5, 381-386. doi: 10.1285/i20705948v5n3p381 Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 33(4), 689-707. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Chang, C. (2010). Message framing and interpersonal orientation at cultural and individual levels: Involvement as a moderator. International Journal of Advertising, 29(5), 765-794. Retrieved from http://www.internationaljournalofadvertising.com/ Chen, S.-P., & Cheng, C.-P. (2014). Model specification for latent interactive and quadratic effects in matrix form. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 94-101. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.859509 Chen, S.-P., & Cheng, C.-P. (2016). Model specification of three-way latent nonlinear effects: The constrained approach (in Chinese). Organization and Management, 9, 127-158. doi:10.3966/199687602016020901004 Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14, 189-217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018 Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Saris, W. E. (2008). Simple, efficient and distribution-free approach to interaction effects in complex structural equation models. Quality & Quantity, 42, 369-396. doi: 10.1007/s11135-006-9050-6 Cole, M. S., Bedeian, A. G., & Bruch, H. (2011). Linking leader behavior and leadership consensus to team performance: Integrating direct consensus and dispersion models of group composition. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 383-398. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.012 Cole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 945-958. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945 Conner, M., McEachan, R., Jackson, C., McMillan, B., Woolridge, M., & Lawton, R. (2013). Moderating effect of socioeconomic status on the relationship between health cognitions and behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46, 19-30. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9481-y Cudeck, R., Harring, J. R., & du Toit, S. H. C. (2009). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of a latent variable model with interaction. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34, 131-144. doi: 10.3102/1076998607313593 Diamantopoulos, A. (2006). The error term in formative measurement models: Interpretation and modeling implications. Journal of Modelling in Management,1, 7-17. doi: 10.1108/17465660610667775 Diamantopoulos, A. (2011). Incorporating formative measures into covariance-based structural equation models. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 335-358. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management, 17, 263-282. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x Diamantopoulos, A., Riefler, P., & Roth, K. P. (2008). Advancing formative measurement models. Journal of Business Research, 61, 1203-1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.009 Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 269-277. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845 Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2009). Mediator and moderator effects of demands on self-control in the relationship between work load and indicators of job strain. Work & Stress, 23, 60-79. doi: 10.1080/02678370902846686 Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2010). Interactive effects of emotional dissonance and self-control demands on burnout, anxiety, and absenteeism. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 412-424. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.05.006 Dijkstra, T. (1983). Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methods. Journal of Econometrics, 22, 67-90. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90094-5 Edwards, J. R., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). On the nature and direction of relationships between constructs and measures. Psychological Methods, 5, 155-174. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.5.2.155 Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12, 1-22. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 Finkbeiner, C. (1979). Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing. Psychometrika, 44, 409-420. doi: 10.1007/BF02296204 Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). A Comparative analysis of two structural equation models : LISREL and PLS applied to market data. In C. Fornell (Ed.), A second generation of multivariate analysis (Vol. 1, pp. 289-324). New York, NY: Praeger. Ganzach, Y. (1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychological Methods, 2, 235-247. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.235 Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-78. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/ Ghazal, G. A., & Neudecker, H. (2000). On second-order and fourth-order moments of jointly distributed random matrices: A survey. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 321, 61-93. doi: 10.1016/S0024-3795(00)00181-6 Harring, J. R., Weiss, B. A., & Hsu, J.-C. (2012). A comparison of methods for estimating quadratic effects in nonlinear structural equation models. Psychological Methods, 17, 193-214. doi:10.1037/a0027539 Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Henseler, J., & Fassott, G. (2010). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: An illustration of available procedures. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 713-735). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Henseler, J., Fassott, G., Dijkstra, T. K., & Wilson, B. (2012). Analysing quadratic effects of formative constructs by means of variance-based structural equation modelling. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 99-112. doi: 10.1057/ejis.2011.36 Hoyle, R. H. (2011). Structural equation modeling for social and personality psychology. London, England: Sage Publications. Hukkelberg, S. S., Hagtvet, K. A., & Kovac, V. B. (2014). Latent interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour applied to quitting smoking. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 83-100. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12034 Isserlis, L. (1918). On a formula for the product-moment coefficient of any order of a normal frequency distribution in any number of variables. Biometrika, 12, 134-139. doi: 10.1093/biomet/12.1-2.134 Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348-357. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.348 Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218. doi: 10.1086/376806 Jeffers, P. I., Muhanna, W. A., & Nault, B. R. (2008). Information technology and process performance: An empirical investigation of the interaction between IT and Non-IT Resources. Decision Sciences, 39, 703-735. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00209.x Jokela, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2011). The association between low socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms depends on temperament and personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.004 Jöreskog, K. G., & Goldberger, A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 631-639. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1975.10482485 Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user`s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International. Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Jun, L., Qiuzhen, W., & Qingguo, M. (2011). The effects of project uncertainty and risk management on IS development project performance: A vendor perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 29, 923-933. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.11.002 Kankanhalli, A., Pee, L. G., Tan, G. W., & Chhatwal, S. (2012). Interaction of individual and social antecedents of learning effectiveness: A study in the IT research context. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 59, 115-128. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2011.2144988 Kelava, A., & Brandt, H. (2009). Estimation of nonlinear latent structural equation models using the extended unconstrained approach. Review of Psychology, 16(2), 123-131. Retrieved from http://psihologija.ffzg.unizg.hr/review Kelava, A., Moosbrugger, H., Dimitruk, P., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2008). Multicollinearity and missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 4, 51-66. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.4.2.51 Kelava, A., Werner, C. S., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., . . . West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and QML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 465-491. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2011.582408 Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.201 Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474. doi: 10.1007/BF02296338 Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647-673. doi: 10.1080/00273170701710205 Koring, M., Richert, J., Lippke, S., Parschau, L., Reuter, T., & Schwarzer, R. (2012). Synergistic effects of planning and self-efficacy on physical activity. Health Education & Behavior, 39, 152-158. doi: 10.1177/1090198111417621 Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y., & Lee, J. C. K. (2003). Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models with ignorable missing data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 111-134. doi: 10.3102/10769986028002111 Lee, S.-Y., Song, X.-Y., & Tang, N.-S. (2007). Bayesian methods for analyzing structural equation models with covariates, interaction, and quadratic latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 404-434. doi:10.1080/10705510701301511 Lee, S.-Y., & Zhu, H.-T. (2000). Statistical analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with continuous and polytomous data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 209-232. doi: 10.1348/000711000159303 Lee, S.-Y., & Zhu, H.-T. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 67, 189-210. doi: 10.1007/BF02294842 Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13, 497-519. doi: 10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1 Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. Luszczynska, A., Cao, D. S., Mallach, N., Pietron, K., Mazurkiewicz, M., & Schwarzer, R. (2010). Intentions, planning, and self-efficacy predict physical activity in Chinese and Polish adolescents: Two moderated mediation analyses. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 10(2), 265-278. Retrieved from http://www.aepc.es/ijchp/ Lyhagen, J. (2007). Estimating nonlinear structural models: EMM and the Kenny-Judd model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 391-403. doi: 10.1080/10705510701301487 MacCallum, R. C., & Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 533-541. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.533 MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Jarvis, C. B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.710 MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293-334. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1979). The commutation matrix: Some properties and applications. The Annals of Statistics, 7, 237-466. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344621 Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1980). The elimination matrix: Some lemmas and applications. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 1, 422-449. doi: 10.1137/0601049 Magnus, J. R., & Neudecker, H. (1988). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Morin, A. J. S. (2013). Moderation. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 361-386). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275-300. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275 Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Hau, K.-T., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Structural equation models of latent interaction and quadratic effects. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course, 2nd Edition (pp. 267-308). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Nagengast, B., & Hau, K.-T. (2012). Structural equation models of latent interaction. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 436-458). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Martínez-Ruiz, A., & Aluja-Banet, T. (2013). Two-step PLS path modeling mode B: Nonlinear and interaction effects between formative constructs. In H. Abdi, W. W. Chin, V. E. Vinzi, G. Russolillo, & L. Trinchera (Eds.), New perspectives in partial least squares and related methods (pp. 187-199). New York, NY: Springer. Mooijaart, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). An alternative approach for nonlinear latent variable models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 17, 357-373. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2010.488997 Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Klein, A. G. (2009). Testing multiple nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling: A comparison of alternative estimation approaches. In T. Teo & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Structural equation modelling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 103-136). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers. Morgan-Lopez, A. A., Castro, F. G., Chassin, L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2003). A mediated moderation model of cigarette use among Mexican American youth. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 583-589. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00262-3 Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49, 115-132. doi: 10.1007/BF02294210 Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus User`s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: CA: Muthén & Muthén. Parade, S. H., Leerkes, E. M., & Blankson, A. N. (2010). Attachment to parents, social anxiety, and close relationships of female students over the transition to college. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 127-137. doi: 10.1007/s10964-009-9396-x Pek, J., Sterba, S. K., Kok, B. E., & Bauer, D. J. (2009). Estimating and visualizing nonlinear relations among latent variables: A semiparametric approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 407-436. doi: 10.1080/00273170903103290 Petter, S., Straub, D., & Rai, A. (2007). Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 623-656. Retrieved from http://www.misq.org/ Ping, R. (2007). Second-order latent variables: Interactions, specification, estimation, and an example. Proceedings of the AMA Winter Educators` Conference, 18, 286-293. Retrieved from https://www.ama.org/Documents/arc_ama_winter2007.pdf Podsakoff, N. P., Shen, W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2006). The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research. In D. J., Ketchen, & D. D. Bergh (Eds.), Research methodology in strategy and management (Vol. 3, pp. 197-252). Oxford, England: Elsevier. Pollack, J. M., Vanepps, E. M., & Hayes, A. F. (2012). The moderating role of social ties on entrepreneurs` depressed affect and withdrawal intentions in response to economic stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 789-810. doi: 10.1002/job.1794 Popan, J. R., Kenworthy, J. B., Frame, M. C., Lyons, P. A., & Snuggs, S. J. (2010). Political groups in contact: The role of attributions for outgroup attitudes in reducing antipathy. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 86-104. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.612 Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316 Reinartz, W., Krafft, M., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). The customer relationship management process: Its measurement and impact on performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 293-305. doi: 10.2307/30162340 Seber, G. A. F. (2007). A Matrix Handbook for Statisticians. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Simonson, H. (1992). Interaction effects of television and socioeconomic status on teenage aggression. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 3, 333-343. doi:10.1080/02673843.1992.9747713 Slater, M. D., Hayes, A. F., & Ford, V. L. (2007). Examining the moderating and mediating roles of news exposure and attention on adolescent judgments of alcohol-related risks. Communication Research, 34, 355-381. doi: 10.1177/0093650207302783 Spearman, C. (1904). "General intelligence," objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-292. doi: 10.2307/1412107 Takeuchi, R., Yun, S., & Wong, K. F. E. (2011). Social influence of a coworker: A test of the effect of employee and coworker exchange ideologies on employees` exchange qualities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,115, 226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.02.004 Treiblmaier, H., Bentler, P. M., & Mair, P. (2011). Formative constructs implemented via common factors. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 1-17. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2011.532693 Tucker-Drob, E. M., & Briley, D. A. (2012). Socioeconomic status modifies interest-knowledge associations among adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.004 Van Rompay, T. J. L., De Vries, P. W., & Van Venrooij, X. G. (2010). More than words: On the importance of picture-text congruence in the online environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.10.003 Wall, M. M. (2009). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation for nonlinear structural equation models. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 540-567). London, England: Sage Publications. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 1-29. doi: 10.3102/10769986026001001 Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2003). A method of moments technique for fitting interaction effects in structural equation models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56, 47-63. doi: 10.1348/000711003321645331 Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2007). Nonlinear structural equation modeling as a statistical method. In S.-Y. Lee (Ed.), Handbook of computing and statistics with applications (Vol. 1, pp. 321-343). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier. Wiedemann, A. U., Schüz, B., Sniehotta, F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2009). Disentangling the relation between intentions, planning, and behaviour: A moderated mediation analysis. Psychology and Health, 24, 67-79. doi: 10.1080/08870440801958214 Williams, L. J., Edwards, J. R., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29, 903-936. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00084-9 Yang-Wallentin, F., & Jöreskog, K. G. (2001). Robust standard errors and chi-squares for interaction models. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 159-171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Ye, C., & Potter, R. (2011). The role of habit in post-adoption switching of personal information technologies: An empirical investigation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(35), 585-610. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/ Yu, S., Mishra, A. N., Gopal, A., Slaughter, S., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2015). E-procurement infusion and operational process impacts in MRO procurement: Complementary or substitutive effects? Production and Operations Management, 24, 1054-1070. doi:10.1111/poms.12362
Description:	博士國立政治大學心理學系 97752501
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097752501
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Psychology] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
250101.pdf	1993Kb	Adobe PDF2	388	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback