政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99308
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51693214      線上人數 : 375
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/99308


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99308


    題名: 探討美國強制實施 XBRL 標準對於價值攸關性之影響 - 以退休金會計為例
    EXPLORING THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE MANDATORY ADOPTION OF XBRL AND VALUE RELEVANCE - A PENSION ACCOUNTING EXAMPLE IN USA
    作者: 白峰瑞
    Pai, Feng Jui
    貢獻者: 諶家蘭
    Seng, Jia Lang
    白峰瑞
    Pai, Feng Jui
    關鍵詞: XBRL
    確定福利計畫
    價值攸關性
    退休金
    XBRL
    Defined Benefit
    Value Relevance
    Pension
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2016-07-20 16:41:23 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 先前研究指出，財報資訊使用者難以使用確定福利計畫制退休金的資訊，其原因可以歸因於退休金會計的複雜性。在後SFAS 158 時期，由於先前僅揭露的退休金負債已認列於資產負債表上，使得退休金資訊的價值攸關性有所提升。然而有研究指出，額外攸關的資訊依然僅在附註揭露中表達，使得XBRL在能否進一步提升該價值攸關上有可以著墨的空間。本研究探討美國SEC XBRL 強制適用是否能提升確定福利計畫制退休金資訊的價值攸關，以及 XBRL財報的特性是否會影響該價值攸關。實證結果發現，美國SEC XBRL 強制適用提升了提撥狀況的價值攸關。另外，實證結果也發現，GAAP 分類標準概念的數量和提撥狀況的價值攸關有負向的關係；延伸分類標準概念的數量和提撥狀況的價值攸關有正向的關係。本研究亦指出，SEC XBRL 強制適用對於提撥狀況價值攸關的提升，及XBRL財報特性對提撥狀況價值攸關的影響，會因為不同階段之 XBRL 採用者而有不同的效果。
    Studies show that the information of defined benefit due its complexity, users may not have the competence to process it. In the post-SFAS-158 period, the previously disclosed liabilities of defined benefit now recognize in the balance sheet. Prior studies have already shown an improvement in value relevance. However, studies suggest the relevant information still presents in footnotes. It leaves a place for XBRL for further improving. In this study, I investigate whether SEC XBRL mandatory adoption improves the value relevance of defined benefit information, also whether the characteristics of XBRL file affect the value relevance of defined benefit. The empirical results show SEC XBRL mandatory adoption improves the value relevance of funded status. Also, the number of GAAP Taxonomy concepts is negatively associated with the value relevance of funded status. Moreover, the number of extension concepts is positively associated with the value relevance of funded status. The additional results show the improvements by XBRL adoption and the influence of the number of GAAP Taxonomy concepts and extension concepts are sensitive to different phases of the adopters.
    參考文獻: (FASB), F. A. S. B. 2010. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 8. FASB Norwalk, CT.
    Ahmadpour, A., and A. Bodaghi. 2012. The effects of XBRL on financial transparency. International Journal of Information Science and Management (IJISM): 65–76.
    Alles, M., and M. Piechocki. 2012. Will XBRL improve corporate governance? A framework for enhancing governance decision making using interactive data. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (2): 91–108.
    De Andrés, J., P. Lorca, and A. B. Martínez. 2010. Factors influencing web accessibility of big listed firms: an international study. Online Information Review 34 (1): 75–97.
    Apostolou, A. K., and K. a Nanopoulos. 2009. Interactive financial reporting using XBRL: An overview of the global markets and Europe. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 6 (February): 262–272.
    Arnold, V., J. C. Bedard, J. R. Phillips, and S. G. Sutton. 2012a. The impact of tagging qualitative financial information on investor decision making: Implications for XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (1): 2–20.
    ———. 2012b. The impact of tagging qualitative financial information on investor decision making: Implications for XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (1): 2–20.
    Baldwin, A. A., C. E. Brown, and B. S. Trinkle. 2006. XBRL: An impacts framework and research challenge. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 3 (1): 97–116.
    Baldwin, A. A., and B. S. Trinkle. 2011. The Impact of XBRL: a Delphi Investigation. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research. Servicio de Publicaciones.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of accounting research: 159–178.
    Barth, M. E. 1991. Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. Accounting Review: 433–463.
    Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1992. The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15 (1): 27–62.
    ———. 2001. The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of accounting and economics 31 (1): 77–104.
    Barth, M. E., and G. Clinch. 2009. Scale Effects in Capital Markets‐Based Accounting Research. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 36 (3‐4): 253–288.
    Beaudoin, C., N. Chandar, and E. M. Werner. 2011. Good disclosure doesn’t cure bad accounting—Or does it? Advances in Accounting 27 (1): 99–110.
    Beaver, W. H. 1968. The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of accounting research: 67–92.
    Bonsón, E., V. Cortijo, and T. Escobar. 2008. The role of XBRL in enhanced business reporting (EBR). Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 5 (1): 161–173.
    Brown, S., K. Lo, and T. Lys. 1999. Use of R 2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades. Journal of Accounting and Economics 28 (2): 83–115.
    Burgstahler, D. C., and I. D. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, Adaptation and Equity Value. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 187–215.
    Chang, C.-C. A., J. C. Duke, and S.-J. Hsieh. 2014. Improving the Disclosure Basis of Pension Accounting. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance 25 (4): 63–70.
    Cohen, E. E. 2009. XBRL’s global ledger framework: Exploring the standardised missing link to ERP integration. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 6 (3): 188–206.
    Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Changes in the value-relevance of earnings and book values over the past forty years. Journal of accounting and economics 24 (1): 39–67.
    Dearman, D. T., and M. D. Shields. 2005. Avoiding Accounting Fixation: Determinants of Cognitive Adaptation to Differences in Accounting Method*. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (2): 351–384.
    Debreceny, R., and S. Farewell. 2010. Adios! Airways: An assignment on mapping financial statements to the US GAAP XBRL taxonomy. Issues in Accounting Education 25 (3): 465–488.
    Debreceny, R., S. Farewell, M. Piechocki, C. Felden, and A. Gräning. 2010. Does it add up? Early evidence on the data quality of XBRL filings to the SEC. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 29 (3): 296–306.
    Debreceny, R., C. Felden, M. Piechocki, C. Felden, and M. Piechocki. 2007. New dimensions of business reporting and XBRL. Springer.
    Debreceny, R., and G. L. Gray. 2001. The production and use of semantically rich accounting reports on the Internet: XML and XBRL. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 2 (1): 47–74.
    Debreceny, R. S., S. M. Farewell, M. Piechocki, C. Felden, A. Gräning, and A. D’Eri. 2011. Flex or break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Accounting Horizons 25 (4): 631–657.
    Ditter, D., K. Henselmann, and E. Scherr. 2011. Using XBRL technology to extract competitive information from financial statements. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business 1 (1).
    Doolin, B., and I. Troshani. 2004. XBRL: a research note. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 1 (2): 93–104.
    Easton, P. D. 1985. Accounting earnings and security valuation: empirical evidence of the fundamental links. Journal of Accounting Research: 54–77.
    Efendi, J., J. D. Park, and C. Subramaniam. 2010. Do XBRL reports have incremental information content?–An empirical analysis. An Empirical Analysis (August 26, 2010).
    Ghani, E. K., F. Laswad, and S. Tooley. 2011. Functional fixation: Experimental evidence on the presentation of financial information through different digital formats. The British Accounting Review 43 (3): 186–199.
    Grosu, V., E. Hlaciuc, E. Iancu, R. Petris, and M. Socoliuc. 2010. The role of the XBRL standard in optimizing the financial reporting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1002.3997.
    Gunn, J. 2007. XBRL: Opportunities and challenges in enhancing financial reporting and assurance processes. Current issues in auditing 1 (1): A36–A43.
    Hann, R. N., F. Heflin, and K. R. Subramanayam. 2007. Fair-value pension accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 44 (3): 328–358.
    Hann, R. N., Y. Y. Lu, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2007. Uniformity versus flexibility: evidence from pricing of the pension obligation. The Accounting Review 82 (1): 107–137.
    Hannon, N. J. 2005. XBRL GL: the general ledger gets its groove. Strategic finance 87 (3): 57.
    van der Heiden, J. 2006. XBRL in plain English. Available online on URL: http://www. bataviaxbrl. com/downloads/XBRLinPlainEnglishv1 1.
    Hirshleifer, D., and S. H. Teoh. 2003. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of accounting and economics 36 (1): 337–386.
    Hodge, F. D., J. J. Kennedy, and L. A. Maines. 2004. Does search-facilitating technology improve the transparency of financial reporting? The Accounting Review 79 (3): 687–703.
    Hoitash, R., and U. Hoitash. 2015. Measuring accounting complexity with XBRL. Available at SSRN 2433677.
    Janvrin, D. J., R. E. Pinsker, and M. F. Mascha. 2013. XBRL-Enabled, Spreadsheet, or PDF? Factors Influencing Exclusive User Choice of Reporting Technology. Journal of Information Systems 27 (2): 35–49.
    Khadaroo, M. I. 2005. Corporate reporting on the internet: some implications for the auditing profession. Managerial Auditing Journal 20 (6): 578–591.
    Kim, J. W., J.-H. Lim, and W. G. No. 2012. The effect of first wave mandatory XBRL reporting across the financial information environment. Journal of Information Systems 26 (1): 127–153.
    Kothari, S. P., and J. L. Zimmerman. 1995. Price and return models. Journal of Accounting and economics 20 (2): 155–192.
    Landsman, W. 1986. An empirical investigation of pension fund property rights. Accounting Review: 662–691.
    Li, S., and E. T. Nwaeze. 2015. The Association between Extensions in XBRL Disclosures and Financial Information Environment. Journal of Information Systems 29 (3): 73–99.
    Li, Y., J. N. Roge, L. Rydl, and M. Crews. 2006. Information technology addresses transparency: the potential effects of XBRL on financial disclosure. Issues in Information Systems 7 (2): 241–245.
    Li, Y., and T. W. Scott. 2015. Human capital, pension information and firm valuation. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation 11 (1): 48–83.
    Liu, C., T. Wang, and L. J. Yao. 2014. XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 33 (1): 69–82.
    Madden, P. 2011. Greater accountability, less red tape: The Australian standard business reporting experience. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR) 7 (2): 1–10.
    Malhotra, R., and F. Garritt. Extensible Business Reporting Language: The Future of E-Commerce-driven Accounting.
    Mejzlik, L., and J. Istvanfyova. 2008. XBRL? the tool for automated semantic readability of electronic financial statements. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation 7 (1): 59–67.
    Mitra, S., and M. Hossain. 2009. Value-relevance of pension transition adjustments and other comprehensive income components in the adoption year of SFAS No. 158. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 33 (3): 279–301.
    O’Riain, S., E. Curry, and A. Harth. 2012. XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 13 (2): 141–162.
    Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation*. Contemporary accounting research 11 (2): 661–687.
    Olsen, D. H., and R. L. Jenson. 2011. XBRL and its potential impact on events reporting. Review of Business Information Systems (RBIS) 7 (2): 33–38.
    PENG, E. Y. A. N., J. SHON, and C. TAN. 2011. XBRL and accruals: Empirical evidence from China. Accounting Perspectives 10 (2): 109–138.
    Pinsker, R., S. Gara, and K. Karim. 2005. XBRL usage: A socio-economic perspective. Clute Institute for Academic Research 9 (4).
    Pinsker, R., and S. Li. 2008. Costs and benefits of XBRL adoption: Early evidence. Communications of the ACM 51 (3): 47–50.
    Qin, L. 2011. XBRL, semantic web and web services. International Journal of Business and Systems Research 5 (5): 443–460.
    Rao, Y., K. Guo, and J. Hou. 2013. Who extends the extensible? The effects of corporate governance on XBRL taxonomy extensions in China. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management 21 (2): 133–147.
    Rezaee, Z., R. Elam, and A. Sharbatoghlie. 2001. Continuous auditing: the audit of the future. Managerial Auditing Journal 16 (3): 150–158.
    Richards, J., and G. Tower. 2004. Progress on XBRL from an Australian perspective. Australian Accounting Review 14 (32): 81–88.
    Roohani, S., Y. Furusho, and M. Koizumi. 2009. XBRL: Improving transparency and monitoring functions of corporate governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 6 (4): 355–369.
    Shin, Y.-C., and K. Yu. 2014. Do investors misprice components of net periodic pension cost? Ed. N. Fargher. Accounting & Finance: n/a–n/a.
    Sutton, S. G., V. Arnold, J. C. Bedard, and J. R. Phillips. 2012. ENHANCING AND STRUCTURING THE MD&A TO AID INVESTORS WHEN USING INTERACTIVE DATA. Journal of Information Systems.
    Turner, E. H. 2013. The Market Value Implications of Pension Asset Allocation.
    Vasarhelyi, M. A., D. Y. Chan, and J. P. Krahel. 2012. Consequences of XBRL standardization on financial statement data. Journal of Information Systems 26 (1): 155–167.
    Wagenhofer, A. 2007. Economic consequences of internet financial reporting. In New Dimensions of Business Reporting and XBRL, 99–123. Springer.
    Weverka, P., and W. S. So. 2008. XBRL for Dummies. Wiley.
    Yoon, H., H. Zo, and A. P. Ciganek. 2011. Does XBRL adoption reduce information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research 64 (2): 157–163.
    Yu, K. 2013. Does Recognition versus Disclosure Affect Value Relevance? Evidence from Pension Accounting. The Accounting Review 88 (3): 1095–1127.
    Yuan, X., and Y. Wang. 2009. Study on the Function of XBRL and the Enhancement of the Accounting Information Quality under the Background of Informationization. International Journal of Business and Management 4 (11): p137.
    Zhao, N., D. C. Yen, and I.-C. Chang. 2004. Auditing in the e-commerce era. Information Management & Computer Security 12 (5): 389–400.
    Zhu, H., and H. Wu. 2012. Interoperability of XBRL Financial Statements in the U.S. International Journal of E-Business Research.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353033
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1033530331
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋