English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113656/144643 (79%)
Visitors : 51703425      Online Users : 329
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/99304
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99304


    Title: 審計委員會與財務主管相對影響力對會計師產業專精委任之關聯性
    The Relative Power of Audit Committee to CFO and auditor’s industry specialization
    Authors: 李佳芷
    Contributors: 金成隆
    李佳芷
    Keywords: 會計師產業專精度
    審計委員會
    審計品質
    Industry specialization
    Audit committee
    Audit quality
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-20 16:41:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以2005年至2014年間中華人民共和國上海及深圳上市公司為研究對象,參照Beck and Mauldin (2014)衡量審計委員會與財務長之間相對影響力之模式,從公司治理觀點分析選任個人層級及事務所層級之產業專家會計師,是否與審計委員會相較於財務主管較具有影響力有關聯性,並參考過去發展的文獻,以多種衡量產業專家之方法執行敏感性分析。本研究結果顯示,當企業之審計委員會相較於財務主管之相對影響力較大時,與個人層級之產業專家及同時為個人層級及事務所層級之產業專家會計師具有顯著正相關、與會計師事務所層級之產業專家呈現不顯著相關,故可推論,審計委員會相對較有影響力時會傾向選擇會計師個人產業專家。
    The primary objective of this thesis is to examine whether and how the relative power of the CFOs to audit committee affects the choice of auditor’s industry specialization, measured as firm level and partner level. We focus my analyses on a sample of listed firms in China during 2005-2014. We follow the measure of the relative power of CFO and audit committee by Beck and Mauldin (2014) to test my predictions. My main findings can be summarized as follows. First, the thesis finds evidence that firms are more likely to choice firm-level audit experts when its CFO is less powerful than audit committee. Second, it also finds that firms are more likely to hire partner-level audit experts when audit committee is relatively powerful than the CFO. The results are robust to other proxies for audit experts.
    Reference: 王雄元、陳文娜與顧俊,2008,審計委員會特徵與會計師事務所變更的經驗研究,審計研究,第12期:87-96。
    林欣誼,2014,審計委員會與聘請產業專家會計師查核之關聯性研究,中原大學碩士論文
    林蓬榮,2000,產業對會計師事務所滿意度調查,實用稅務,第 308 期(8 月): 29-37。
    陳政芳與李啟華,2005,產業知識與盈餘品質-以五大會計師事務所內部組別為觀察標的,討論稿,國立東華大學。
    陳逸仲,2009,審計委員會與資訊透明度、財務報導品質與股價反應之探討,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    曾乾豪,2014,審計委員會特性與會計師特性之關聯性研究,臺北大學博士論文。
    楊雅茹,2013,審計委員會成員特性與產業專家會計師選任關聯性之研究,國立成功大學碩士論文。
    Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, and G. F. Peters. 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(1):69-87.
    Abbott, L. J., S. Parker, G. F. Peters, and K. Raghunandan. 2003. The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 22(2):17-32.
    Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of practice & Theory 22(September):71-97.
    Becker, C., M. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15(1): 1–24.
    Beck, M. J., and E. G. Mauldin. 2014. Who’s really in charge? Audit committee versus CFO power and audit fees. The Accounting Review 89:2057-2085.
    Bedard, J., and K. M. Johnstone. 2004. Earnings manipulation risk, corporate governance risk, and auditors’ planning and pricing decisions. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 277-304.
    Bedard, J. C., S. F. Biggs, and D. M. Frederick. 1991. The effect of domain-specific experience on evaluation of management representation in analytical procedures. Auditing: Journal of Practice & theory 10(supplement): 77-95.
    Bernard, V., and T. Stober. 1989. The nature and amount of information reflected in cash flows and accruals. The Accounting Review 64 (October): 624-652.
    Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC). 1999. Report and recommendation of the blue ribbon committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. New York, NY: New York Stock Exchange and National Association of Securities Dealers.
    Bradbury, M. E., Y. T. Mak, and S. M. Tan. 2006. Board characteristics, Audit Committee Characteristics and Abnormal Accruals. Pacific Accounting Review 18(2):47-68.
    Brown, H., and A. Wright. 2008. Negotiation research in auditing. Accounting Horizons 22(1): 91-109.
    Caramanis, C., and C. Lennox. 2008. Audit effort and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 45: 116-138.
    Carcello, J. V., and A. L. Nagy. 2002. Auditor industry specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Accounting Journal 19(5): 651-668.
    Carcello, J. V., and T. L. Neal. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following new going-concern reports. The Accounting Review 78(1):95-117.
    Chan, D. K., A. Ferguson, and D.A. Simunic, and D. Stokes. 2001. A capital analysis and test of oligopolistic competition in the market for assurance services. Working paper, University of British Columbia.
    Cheffers, M., and D. Whalen. 2011. Audit fees and non-audit fees: An eight year trend. Audit Analytics (May).
    Chen, K. Y., and K. S. Wu. 2002. The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper, National Cheng Kung University.
    Chin, C. L., and H. Y. Chi. 2009. Reducing Restatements with Increased Industry Expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(3): 729–765.
    Christensen, B., T. Omer, N. Sharp, and M. Shelley. 2013. Pork bellies and public company audits: Have audits once again become just another commodity? Working paper, Texas A&M University.
    Cohen, J. R., C. Hayes, G. Krishnamoorhy, and A. Wright. 2010. Corporate governance in the Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Era: Auditors’ experiences. Contemporary Accounting Research 27(3): 51-86.
    Craswell A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 297-322.
    Dao, M., K. Raghunandan, and D. Rama. 2012. Shareholder voting on auditor selection, audit fees, and audit quality. The Accounting Review 87(1):149-171.
    Das, S., P. K. Shroff, and H. Zhang. 2009. Quarterly earnings patterns and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 26(3): 797-831.
    DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 1-36.
    DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1991. Incidences and circumstances of accounting errors. The Accounting Review 66:643-655.
    DeFond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17(2): 193-225.
    DeFond, M. L., J. R. Francis, and T. J. Wong. 2000. Auditor industry specialization and market segmentation: Evidence from Hong Kong. Auditing: A Journal of practice & Theory 19 (Spring): 49-66.
    DeZoort, F. T., D. Hermanson, and R. Houston. 2008. Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: Pre-SOX versus post-SOX judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 27(1):85-104.
    DeZoort, F. T., and S. Salterio. 2001 The effects of corporate governance experience and financial reporting and audit knowledge on audit committee members judgments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20(2): 31-47.
    Ettredge, M., E. E. Fuerherm, and C. Li. 2014. Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (4):247-263.
    Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    Farber, D. B., 2005. Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review 80, 539-561.
    Francis, J., E. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of practice & Theory 18(2):17-34.
    Felo, A. J., S. Krishnamurthy, and S. A. Solleri. 2003. Audit committee characteristics and the perceived quality of financial reporting: An empirical analysis. Unpublished Paper, Binghamton University.
    Ge, W., D. Matsumoto, and J. L. Zhang. 2011. Do CFOs have style? An empirical investigation of the effect of individual CFOs on accounting practices. Contemporary Accounting Research 28:1141-1179.
    Geiger, M. A., and D. S. North. 2006. Does hiring a new CFO change things? An investigation of changes in discretionary accruals. The Accounting Review 81 (4):781-809.
    Gibbins, M., S. McCraken, and S. Salterio. 2007. The chief financial officer’s perspective on negotiations with auditor on financial reporting issues. Contemporary Accounting Research 24(Summer):387-422.
    Graham, J. R., C. R. Harvey, and S. Rajgopal. 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40:3-73.
    Godfrey, J. M., and J. Hamilton. 2005. The impact of R&D intensity on demand for specialist auditor service. Contemporary Accounting Research 22(1): 55-93.
    Hogan, C. E., and D. C. Jeter. 1999. Industry specialization by auditor. Auditing: A Journal of practice & Theory 18(spring):1-17.
    Kane, G. D., F. M. Richardson, and P. Graybeal. 1996. Recession-induced stress and the prediction of corporate failure. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(2): 631-650.
    Khurana, I., and K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 79(2): 473-495.
    Krishnan, J. 2005. Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review 80(2):649-675.
    Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does big 6 auditor industry expertise earnings management? Accounting Horizon 17: 1-16.
    Krishnan, V. R. 2005. Transformational leadership and outcomes: role of relationship duration. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 26 (6):442 – 457.
    Laux, C., and C. Leuz. 2009. The crisis of fair value accounting: Making sense of the recent debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34:826-834.
    McDaniel, I., R. D. Martin, and L. A. Maines. 2002. Evaluating financial reporting quality: The effects of financial expertise V.S. financial literacy. The Accounting Review 77:139-167.
    Palmrose, Z. V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Spring): 97-110.
    Reason, T. 2010. Fees still falling, though not as dramatically. CFO (September). Available at:http://ww2cfo.com/accounting-tax/2010/09/fees-still-falling-but-not-as-dramatically.
    Reed, B., M. Trombley, and D. Dhaliwal. 2000. Demand for audit quality: the case of Laventhol and Horwath’s Auditors. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance15(2):183-198.
    Reynolds, J. K., and J. R. Francis. 2000. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30(3):375–400.
    Shockley, R. and R. Holt. 1983. A behavioral investigation of supplier differentiation in the market for audit services. Journal of Accounting Research 21 (Autumn):545-564.
    Solomon, I., M. D. Shields, and O. R. Whittington. 1999. What do industry-specialist auditors know? Journal of Accounting Research 37 (1): 191-208.
    Watkins, A. L., W. Hillison, and S. E. Morecroft. 2004. Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature 23 (1): 153-193.
    Wu, M. 2002. Earnings restatements: A capital market perspective. Working paper, Hong Kong University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353040
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103353040
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback