English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50917932      Online Users : 831
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99170


    Title: 中共對臺政策之理性與組織過程分析：以2002-2010年的政策變化為例
    Other Titles: Analysis of Rational Actors and the Organizational Process of PRC’s Taiwan Policy between 2002 and 2010
    Authors: 游智偉;陳政一
    Yu, Chih-Wei;Chen, Cheng-I
    Keywords: 國家利益;有限理性;中共對臺政策;兩岸關係
    national interests;bounded rationality;PRC’s Taiwan policy;cross-Strait relations
    Date: 2011-12
    Issue Date: 2016-07-19 16:51:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文認為上述變化可歸結於中共在有限理性下重新考量國家統一和經濟發展的重要性所致，藉和平發展的提出重構國家發展路徑，將發展經濟視為國家最高利益，而和平發展則為國家統一的先期工作，並藉反分裂國家法將對臺政策重心從促統轉向反獨，目標從改變現狀轉為維持現狀，但這些變化卻影響中共各部門執行層級原奉行的標準作業程序，使其臺辦系統承受其他系統的壓力，而在2008年下半年後不斷拋出政治議題，但這樣的情景在2010年底後消失，在領導人有限理性的意志下，「穩中求進」成為當前大陸對臺政策主要的綱領依據。
    Recently, it seemed that PRC’s Taiwan policy had been changed, characterized by Taiwan’s successful participation in the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2009. The changes can be described by “bounded rationality,” as PRC reconsidered the priority of national interests amongst state unification and economic development through peaceful means. With the formulation of the “Anti-Secession Law (ASL),” the focus and purpose of PRC’s Taiwan Policy had been transformed from “promoting unification” and “changing Status Quo” to “opposing independence” and “maintaining Status Quo.” Therefore, the most significant meaning in the ASL was that the “One China Principle” had been loosened. The standard operation process held by each governmental branch had also been influenced by these changes, causing the Taiwan Affairs Office System (TAOS) to experience added pressure , especially in foreign affairs and commerce in the WHA and ECFA cases. TAOS, as a result of such, had proposed and pressed Taiwan to engage in political issues in the second half of 2008. However, the circumstance disappeared at the end of 2010 when China’s leaders had re-confirmed the “proactive” principle (wen-jung-chiou-jin) as the basic outline of PCR’s Taiwan policy.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 54(4), 57-88
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    54(4)p57-88.pdf1455KbAdobe PDF2714View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback