English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51596138      Online Users : 858
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99169


    Title: 物質基礎、理念慣性：中國「王道」戰略文化的實證檢驗1838～1842
    Other Titles: Material Basis, Ideational Inertia: An Empirical Assessment of Chinese “Benevolent” Strategic Culture 1838~1842
    Authors: 楊仕樂
    Yang, Shih-yueh
    Keywords: 現實主義;建構主義;戰略文化;物質;理念;武力使用
    realism;constructivism;strategic culture;material;ideation;use of force
    Date: 2011-12
    Issue Date: 2016-07-19 16:51:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國戰略文化（Strategic Culture）的研究，是當今現實主義（Realism）與建構主義（Constructivism）間理論爭議，與如何面對崛起中國政策辯論的交會點。依循現實主義的傳統，崛起後的中國將走向侵略擴張、破壞體系穩定；但從建構主義的觀點出發，現實主義純物質的見解則被認為是忽略了文化對行為的作用，是只基於西方經驗的片面斷言。中國與西方有著不同的戰略文化，是中國「王道」與西方「霸道」的差別，如果不考慮中國此一戰略文化的獨特性，將不能瞭解中國的戰略行為。只不過，這種「王道」與「霸道」之別的見解，往往缺乏嚴謹的實證檢驗。目前雖有研究嘗試以有系統的方式呈現宋、明兩代的歷史紀錄，視這兩個朝代為中國戰略文化解釋最可能成立的案例，來駁斥這「王道」不同於「霸道」的論點，但這樣的實證研究仍然只佔相對的少數，且亦存有概念與方法上的缺陷。「王道」戰略文化對中國的戰略行為究竟有沒有影響？本文將採取物質基礎、理念慣性的觀點，針對「王道」戰略文化解釋真正最可能成立的晚清時代，以鴉片戰爭為案例，嘗試對這有關中國戰略文化的焦點問題提供解答。
    The Chinese strategic culture is the convergence of theoretical debates between realist and constructivist, which drives the policy debates on the means to deal with the rising China. Following the tradition of realism, a rising China will favor aggression and expansion, undermining international stability. In contrast, according to the constructivist perspective, the realist materialist perspective ignores the role of culture on state’s behaviors thus an incomplete assertion based on the Western experience only. In fact, China and the West have different strategic culture. Chinese “benevolence” is different from Western “hegemony.” Only when this unique Chinese strategic culture is considered can one understand China’s strategic behavior. Nonetheless, this “benevolent/hegemony” argument often lacks rigorous empirical testing. Some attempts were made by presenting historical records of China’s Song and Ming Dynasties, the two most likely resemblences for strategic culture explanation. However, such empirical researches are relatively rare and contain conceptual and methodological flaws. Did Chinese “benevolent” strategic culture ever make an impact on China’s strategic behavior? This article introduces a material basis/ideational inertia perspective on the strategic culture and takes the Opium War in the late Qing Dynasty as the true resemblance to test the validity of cultural explanation.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 54(4), 1-28
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    54(4)p1-28.pdf2046KbAdobe PDF2476View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback