政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99147
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50924614      Online Users : 917
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99147


    Title: 「西方」如何影響日本的「中國研究」？—以日本福特基金會論爭為例
    Other Titles: How “West” Affects China Studies in Japan? A Case Study on the Ford Foundation Debate
    Authors: 邵軒磊
    Shao, Hsuan-lei
    Keywords: 美國區域研究;現代中國研究;福特基金會事件;戰後日本;學術社群
    Asia/Ford Foundation;American area studies;postwar Japan;modern China studies;academic community
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2016-07-19 16:27:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「福特亞細亞基金會事件」是現代日本中國學界最重要的論爭之一，內容為美國在1962年時以巨額資金補助特定研究，造成一波學界關於學術倫理問題之討論。由此引發了日本學界對「研究主體性」之認識與反省，也使學界群體逐漸走向對立，造成各界對文革觀感完全不同。論爭中主要的批判在於「學術研究對於社會的責任、亞非拉美觀點與發展路徑的關係、對美國區域研究方法的批判與認識」三個層次。本文從知識系譜角度出發，試圖解釋此期間日本中國學界如何接受西方思潮（特別是美國），包括知識論上的「科學主義」、方法論上的「區域研究」與發展觀上的「西方近代化路徑」三個面向。
    “The Asia-Ford Foundation Event” was one of the most important debate on China studies in Japan. Triggered by US Ford Foundation’s large amount of research grant, the event created heated discussion over academic ethics and “subjectivity of research” in Japan’s academic community, and made academic community divided over China’s Cultural Revolution. The main issues included researcher’s social responsibility, Asian/African/Latin American development approach, and critiques on area studies in the US. This paper attempts to explain how Japanese academic community accepts “western（especially American）research methods” and three aspects will be addressed, which include “scientific principle” in Epistemology, “area study” in methodology, and “Western model” in modernizing process.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 52(3), 71-90
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Mainland China Studies] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52(3)p71-90.pdf1840KbAdobe PDF2385View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback